Women are twice as likely as men to lose their jobs to robots

Didn't we already figure this one out when the oculus rift was invented?

>>131607281
Their are already talks about increasing the female quotas at workplace to 50% to mitigate this issue.

so men are still gonna get screwed.

>>131607281
I wouldn't doubt that womens UBI will have a 15% premium to make up for that.

>>131607281
If serious automation is coming, why do we need immigrants?

File: 3DPD worst nightmare.webm (3MB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 800x450px

>>131607281
>Woman
>job
lmao

>>131607537
to impregnate the robots

>>131607281
If you have a sexbot, no nned to hire a hooker.

I love self serve checkouts.

File: 2D1CE7F300000578-3260458-The_report_says_sexbots_could_be_used_in_strip_clubs_and_be_perf-a-89_1444047107697[1].jpg (135KB, 634x359px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 634x359px

>>131607281
whoo hoo sexbots confirmed

>>131607281
I remember roasties on social media were celebrating when there was a report that claimed that working class men would be most affected by automation. Women were so quick to throw working class men under the bus, so I couldnt careless about what happens to wimminz when female dominated professions like m cashiers and receptionists are replaced by bots.

>>131607281
So robots are misogynists?

And this is a surprise? Women like to do what their told to do - just like a robot. Men are inventive, innovative, try to fix things and make them better. Exactly what a robot isn't able to do well. Women will be happier out of work anyway - they can sit at home and pay more attention to the kids.

>>131607281
All this says is that women are less capable than men.

Even if we're to account for it being a symptom of jobs that are predominantly female, again - it says the positions they hold need nominal coordination, adaptation, or creativity.

It's also horseshit, because automation is going to move so fast, the fact that women lose their jobs first is practically meaningless, since basically everyone is going to be jobless in the course of a decade or two.

File: 89t34u8934tu89t34.jpg (11KB, 300x288px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 300x288px

>women's jobs are so simple they dont even require cognitive intelligence
top fuggin lol

File: 1465369502116.jpg (213KB, 1309x515px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 1309x515px

Because any job a woman does a robot does better

>>131607281
That's silly, robots can't be moms.

>>131607281
You mean grocery clerks, administrative assistants, receptionists and restaurant servers are mostly women? Shocking

>>131607281
automation is sexist

Anyone who thinks jobs will all be replaced by robots and driving will be replaced by auto driving is fucking retarded