Local texts say the Sikhs gave rise in opposition of Muslim expansionism eastward towards India. My question is are they better or worse? I don't want to quickly assume the enemy of my enemy is a friend.
>>131595561
Soviets/ Hindu communists opposed Sikhs/ Khalistan
guess who supported them?
>>131595561
They easily integrate into western societies, so bad. Muslims don't integrate which causes conflict and destabilization generating support for radical right wing movements where none would have existed without this culture clash.
So Sikhs are just prolong the neo liberal world order of Starbucks, McDonald's, gay marriage, and democracy (oligarchy), while Islamic invasion provides the impetus for collective European evolution preparing our people for our intergalactic civilizational phase.
>>131595561
man, kubrick really is the master of practical lighting + great composition. Also, bump
>>131595561
Yes they aren't half bad and not a fraction as bad as muslems, these guys are actually kind of cool.