What do we do with people that have 0 value for the system anymore

Return to sender.

>>131532127
We don't give them gibs for being worthless. It's that easy.

Adapt or die.

File: index.jpg (11KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 300x168px

Austerity to increase the cost of capital investment of automation and decrease the demands of the goods it would produce.

Immigration as an unlimited pool of reserve labour to prevent wage increases.

Reregulate the economy to favour the service sector which is much more resistant to productivity increases.

Look at how many new hand car wash places there are in the uk despite having automated ones for decades.

>>131532593
who would initiate such regulation? all regulations are put in place with lobbyists' efforts behind them. Either you break to their demands or they go to someone else who will and now you lose out on the business. Example: enforce minimum wages in US, work gets outsourced to poopland and china

Stop giving them things for being useless.

But allow them to forage, fish etc. and etch out their own existence.

Basically make it possible to exist outside the system, or join the system and be productive. If you want the protection and security of the system, then you must contribute to it. If you want to chance it alone, that is also your right.

Remove all land ownership and allow property ownership only.

Or, if you don't want walled cities and segregation a la 2000ad comic 'megacity', then find a way to make them productive.