https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/jul/04/gurgaon-life-city-built-private-companies-india-intel-google
explain this. yes, infrastructures are gonna be built if there's demands or if it's profitable. but what if no one actually wants to deal with sewage because it's not profitable ?
guys please help me with answers. i need arguments.
>>131530568
>if no one actually wants to deal with sewage
Move out of India? There's a lot of money to be made in plumbing.
>Instead of waiting for the Haryana Urban Development Authority to set up the services they needed, the companies improvised, bringing in private builders to pave roads and drill borewells, and buying privately owned backup diesel generators. Private companies, they felt, would do the job faster and better than the government could.
Sounds like the government fucked up by being incredibly slow. Again.
>>131532149
but that's all privatization is about : better service.
>>131532645
Yea but you can't compete with "free". Why invest in something when the government is gonna foot the bill anyway eventually and worse probably ban you from providing these services at all.
http://www.sabhlokcity.com/2016/07/the-myth-that-gurgaon-is-a-private-city/
>>131534253
tl:dr, expropriation and adjudication of land from the government to a company to build a city.
As "private" as a public hospital having private management.
>>131534253
fuck, thanks for this. now i'm gonna win the debate