LEFTIST IQ

its the other way round ; )

this will be a beautiful thread

Because they are not right.

>>131506357
Yes animal farm was about animal rearing

>>131506357
Because high IQ capitalists are too busy making money, so you don't notice them.

File: DCI6h5QUQAASVar.jpg (79KB, 564x556px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 564x556px

>>131506357
Niggers with IQ below 65 are Leftists

File: Gorwell.jpg (10KB, 327x154px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 327x154px

>>131506593
Did you seriously skip reading Homage to Catalonia?

>>131506357
>high IQ
>low common sense

File: hqdefault.jpg (18KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 480x360px

>>131506357
Niggers with IQ below 65 are Far-Left

>>131506644
Are they? Africans tend to be quite tribal and religious in my experience.

>>131506357

As a challenge to you, name some high IQ right wing people. You can do that with at least a few right? Or did the TV not tell you any when you were growing up?

inteligent people tend not to have prejudices against people who are different and think beyond base level tribalism

Mid-tier bait. You can do better.

>>131506357
>Why do People of higher Intellect tend to be far left?
Maybe its the ability to empathize.
There also have been studies that many of right wingers perceive any change as a threat and generally are hostile towards things/people they don't understand.
Couple that with the low education you have in 'murican rust belt and oooooh boy.....

>>131506357
Very smart people are detached from reality of 99% stupid people, they cant relate or project.

>>131506831
donald trump

>>131506357
There are a lot of intelligent white men.
The right-wing ones are making money

>>131506357
Niggers also vote left, but are incredibly stupid. What gives?

>>131506357
Because they can't or refuse to accept and understand chaos.

>>131506831
I know Ben Sharpiro skipped a few grades, but I read a lot of biography's of Chemists and Philosophers and there aren't many in the traditional sense of right wing.

A lot of these people tend to deal only in theoretical ideas and when taking it from a theoretical point of view marxism does look like an attractive ideology.

Unfortunately, reality is much less than ideal and human nature and general economical concepts like scarcity exist, so the whole idea always breaks down in execution.

Surprisingly most top nazis were high IQ

leftism includes people and right wing ideologies excludes people

people are much more likely to accept something that includes them than excludes them

>>131506952
Are they? I hear conservatives like Thomas Sowell say that, but I don't see much in the way of evidence.

>>131506831
Western nations/globalism is right wing economically

>>131506831
As a right-wing person who has been accepted in to Mensa. Myself.

>>131506980
Are right wingers making all the money? I would think Liberals would be the richest, looking at places like Silicon Valley.

>>131507016
Democrat =/= far economic left.

>>131506357
Einstein couldn't drive a car. Leftists- great in theory but hopeless when it comes to the practical world.

>>131506357
>liberal thinkers
>posts sartre
Wasnt sartre all about not being a retard and taking responsibilty for ones own existential plight? Sounds like the opposite of liberal degeneracy.

>>131506952
This. Leftists who are not detached (like aforementioned Orwell) are quite rare.

>>131506357
>Oscar Wilde, George Orwell
Really, those are you examples of higher intellect? Novelists?

How about Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh, high-achieving antisemites with Nazi sympathies?

>>131506751
Yeah and that makes him an ancap right?

>>131506357
>Why do People of higher Intellect tend to be far left?
Thats actually not the case the far left usually attracts the biggest idiots. The left and center usually have them not the far left lol
Also you have to look at the time at that point because what was then left is today "omg alt right nazi!!!!" the alt right today has more in common with the left in the past than the far left has today.

>>131507342
Is that relevant in context? In a much less industrial time and raised in Europe where cars are a lot less essential.

>>131507269
You should look at what they vote with their feet and not with their ballot.

Are these companies settling in socialist countries?

>>131506357
Very high empathy and the mistake of an intellectual that having knowledge in one domain makes you universally clever

the highest IQ individuals are physcists and mathematicians and computer scientists.

there is a lot of variance between them and very little bias one way or the other, so overall if you took the average they'd be centre.

it's only artsy people who have high verbal IQ but lack the capacity for precise, rigorous , logical deduction that are on average to the far left.

>>131507353
He was a Marxist.

Left wing ideas sound better and more empathetic if you're stupid and / or emotional. If two uneducated people one on the right and one the left have a debate it's going to sound like the guy on the right is an asshole 100% of the time. A leftist can get their retarded appeal to emotion "arguments" from the vast majority of media out there, but to effectively dismantle them the rightist needs to be versed in economics, the rhetorical tricks and traps all leftists use, and the morality of heirarchy. If not the plebs are going to be drawn to the leftist.

File: 1498527417771.jpg (83KB, 618x1024px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 618x1024px

>>131506357
For one it can be said as a general rule, that high IQ right wingers often don't get attention because their upbringing to award them such a stimulated intellect puts responsibilities of work and family above literary or journalistic goals. Combine this with government regulation of academic sites like universities which naturally award pro-government rhetoric over any counter narrative ideas presented by right wingers and you can see how right wing thinkers are put at a huge disadvantage to propergate their works.

Secondly, a high IQ doesn't mean that one can effectively delineate bias, and the people you listed would have written in a supportive echo chamber of like minded "thinkers" who defined themselves not necessarily by the merit of their ideas but simply by their own school of thought, it's very stylish to be a nonconformist in intellectual circles and that doesn't require necessarily telling objective truth or else Marxism would never have left the coffee shops in Berlin and London where it was spawned.

>>131506357
>>131507628
Not that well read on Wilde but Orwell, while a critic of Stalanism, was still a through and through ideologue of socialism, and through his writings can be interpreted as sympathetic to Trotsky. Where do you think he sourced his inspiration from? the socialist English coffee shops? the Republican army in Spain? A single incorrect idea can still spawn very deep and thought provoking ideologies around it, and this is where these people's IQ was invested. The brain can be very skilled at deconstructing patterns, but if it accepts one un-truth, or is fooled by one lie, then the rest of it's thought processes are corrupted.

Then theirs Einstein, a man who plagiarised the general theory of relativity from several other scientists and got his Jewish friends to bend the rules to award him a noble prize even though he didn't qualify. The nepotism ran so deep that he was offered to be the first prime minister of Israel. Einstein is nothing but a messiah figure built up by a nepotist media and academic community.

>>131507178
Libertarians really believe that legalizing drugs and recreational nukes will be ok because they cant really relate to double digits IQ people.

>>131506357
This applies for Whites only:
>Far-left: 115-130 IQ
>Left: 100-115
>Right: 85-115
>Far Right: over 9000

>>131506605

Can confirm.

t. Memberof Thetripleninesociety

>>131506831

>As a challenge to you, name some high IQ right wing people. You can do that with at least a few right? Or did the TV not tell you any when you were growing up?

Come on, someones gotta know at least one!

How could a person declare accurately that the left has more intellectuals when you aren't familiar with a single right wing intellectual!

>>131506751
Yeah I read it and then you would know then that there was nuance to the term he wrote in that sentence 'as I understand it'

>>131507533
Most of them tend to be Auspies that are apolitical or liberal (same thing).

>>131506357
You're listing memes, especially pic related. The true geniuses were red-pilled (Leibniz, Godel, Kafka, Dostoevsky)

>>131506831
Guénon, Evola, Heidegger

Wtf do you want nigger?

>>131507751

Could it be that all the Holiday Inn Express staying liberals have been mis-educated by the marxist mass media, and have not in fact done their homework, have not in fact ever left the safety of their intellectual bubbles?

>>131507614
Maybe Left wing ideas sound better because they are. I haven't seen the Zombie economics work out so far.

>>131506357
>>131507644
Lastly it is important to remember that IQ=/=morality.
Since the death of god it can be thought that our academics have replaced priests as our moral guides. Just because someone has a mind which can process things better, doesn't not inherantly mean they can discern right and wrong better. They may be able to express right and wrong in a more eloquent manner which is beyond you, but that also means they are just as capable as expressing it incorrectly through whatever warped lens of ideology they focus their ideas through.

>>131506357
Id consider tesla red pilled in the sense that he dedicated every wake moment of his life towards creating a world better for the fellow man and ignoring women as " A true inventor puts his passion into his science"

>>131507751
>Nietzsche
>Heidegger
>Evola
That's three easy ones just off the top of my head.

>>131506357
politics is about people. ill take someone who understands people over an intellectual any day

File: alexander-solzhenitsyn-9488509-2-raw.jpg (184KB, 784x1200px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 784x1200px

Solzhenitsyn. You fucking normie faggots.

>>131507886
"Marxist media", you do realist Marxist ideas are in direct conflict with corporate profit? Companies lose a heap of their stock when they air documentaries on the exploitation of the third world.

Because they want to elevate and distinguish themselves from the unwashed masses by being as different from them as possible, so they adhere themselves to radical ideologies to show exactly how different they are. Leftists talk about the right voting against their own interests, but in reality they're implying that the right doesn't know what's best for themselves and that they're the moral and intellectual authority on all things under the sun. They're pretty much the epitome of edgy contrarians. They did it before /pol/ made it cool.

>>131508251
Only if the retarded policies are ever enacted, which they won't. The social agenda of Marxism is completely aligned with the corporate agenda.

>>131506357
>economic
>Marx

but to your point, its narcissism. the belief that you are smarter than others and have a right to control them is something inherent in collectivism.

>>131506357
liberals have higher iq than national socialists, however libertarians have the highest iq

>>131506357
Because pseudo-intellectualism is celebrated in an age of decadence.

>>131508649
Of course radical centrists are at the peak of the IQ mountain

>>131506803
>>131506644
Democrats are on average center-right.

>>131507353
He was accused multiple times of being sympathetic to Stalin.

>>131508563
>"control them"
>left wing

>>131506831

James Woods is Mensa
old smelly bait OP

>>131507522
>>131507342

That's retarded. He was born before the fucking Benz Patent-Motorwagen for fucks sakes.

That's like saying you're retarded cause you can't walk on Mars.

>>131507652
I am fully aware that dumb people will destroy themselves when all drugs are legalized. All the more reason to legalize it

>>131506357
Its not, its just people who are high IQ will be successful in their fields. And people who go into academia and typical left leaning. All the high IQ right leaning people go into business. Its just an informational bias of who gets the most publicity.

File: Christian_scientists.gif (820KB, 3558x3364px) Image search: [Google]

820KB, 3558x3364px

>>131506357
>Why do People of higher Intellect tend to be far left?

Actually libertarians have the highest IQ on average, the (((media))) just likes to misconstrue this as "liberals".

>Oscar Wilde, George Orwell, Albert Einstein

Oswald Teichmüller, Henry Ford, John von Neumann

Hi IQ/functioning right-leaning people go into business and finance, and their left-leaning peers go into academia.

>>131506357

>Orwell
>Leftist

What the hell are you talking about?

>>131507644

You have no idea what you're talking about with Einstein. You most likely just read someone else's diatribe and know nothing about physics. E=mc2 is similar in form to an equation of Lawrence, but the implications of the physics ramifications are far more incredible than Lawrence ever conceived. Einstein also wrote 4 papers, including one on the photon quanta which is what he won for because it was the closest to being accepted by the community at the time.

He never disguised that he had built upon ideas of Max Planck and others, quite the contrary Planck promoted him, and the idea that he could somehow just repackage the ideas of the smartest people in the world and get away with it is only a fantasy to be entertained by the most imbecilic of morons.

>>131506831
high iq people are smart enough not to signal being right wing and get mauled by the autistic screeching leftist hordes

File: DDJG0UkXsAE0cgo.jpg (17KB, 386x415px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 386x415px

>>131506357
The Highest IQ individuals are Libertarians. The Leftists tend to be people of slightly above average intelligence who are aware of their lack of true ability and so seek novelty.

this is the thing--it literally does not matter how intelligent you are, if your idea is factually incorrect, it's a bad idea. Claiming that being paid a wage is actually the same as being stolen of because your made-up version of "Value" which cannot be tested empirically or defended logically says so, you're a snake oil salesman. Marx was objectively wrong.

The NatSoc leadership were all also very high IQ, some absurdly so. So what does that mean? Because the entire Nazi leadership were MENSA-tier does that mean that they're automatically right? No, of course not. I mean they're more right than Communists but their ideology is still categorically evil. All you need to know to verify that Leftism is empirically incorrect is to engage in basic epistemological debate with them. They have no answers that are not pure sophistry.

Unlike 90% of lolberts I don't actually hate NatSocs, I think at heart most of them are former Libertarians who got pushed too far and now want to go one step beyond Pinochet and literally impose their enemies' greatest fears on them by actually becoming Nazis. Rockwell was actually pretty spot-on when it came to markets.

>>131510075
>socialists aren't leftists

>>131506820
Africa is literally dominated by Socialist and Communist parties. They are religious--Leftism is a religion. The Nelson Mandela, the ANC in SA, all factions of the Angolan Civil War, Robert Mugabe, the Somalian government to name a few. Notice a common theme, aside from all being failed states or teetering on the edge.

>>131509880
Source? the only study I've seen of those results was testing for Autism originally.

Because those with higher IQ tend to be (or become) intellectuals, who are often utopians who live in their own upper-class bubbles, separated from the rest of society. Thus, they never encounter the reality or hardships of the common citizen and only see that reality through the lens of their own bubble's ideology - namely liberalism, socialism etc. Furthermore, intellectuals, who very often are upper-middle class or higher, rarely have to suffer the consequences of the failed political ideologies they champion, and thus find it easy dismiss and find an excuse for the plight of the plebs, often from biased sources that only move the blame to something else. Intellectuals might have the highest IQ but they're always blind ideolouges and only get their ideas from utopian litterature, not reality, while the common man is more pragmatic and realistic. High IQ does not equal the best ideas, but rather often the opposite.

>>131507360
This is probably to do with orwell being working class and having experience of life outside the safe space of the "intellectuals" who grew up mostly in gated communities.

>>131506357
yet all economists tend to lean right. i think the point is economics is counterintuitive and propaganda is rife so it's a particularly difficult field to wade through. people who become masters of physics or literature rarely have the bandwidth to go deep into economics.

its an expert field. we dont take physics advice from economists, why would you care what einstein says about resource management?

File: 1498480011201.jpg (114KB, 1024x613px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1024x613px

>>131506831
>>131506357

>>131510955
This. Orwell fucking detested intellectuals. Also his time fighting for the Republicans in Spain redpilled him on the dangers of communism after seeing it with his own eyes and after being nearly executed by them for his critiscism.

>>131506357
>Why do People of higher Intellect tend to be far left?
Anyone with an above average IQ realizes any form of extremism (left or right) is always doomed to fail. Ever wonder why the US has never had a single party in power for more than 2 terms?
You're a retard OP.

>>131506831

Pretty much anybody who wasn't a faggot could be considered right wing now.

>>131506357
Leftism is based in academia and is a student thing. Intellectuals tend to stay in academia, thus are eternal students. It isn't hard to figure out.

>>131506357
They don't, or are you talking about those masturbatory articles that say things like "Study: Left smarter than Right" ?
How many right wingers do you see waiting around for pollsters to ask them questions? Where do you find a concentration of right wingers?
The left is concentrated to the cities. Look at the election map. It's a false equivalency fallacy and those who think shit is this cut and dry are sitting at the wrong end of the bell curve.

>>131507178
High IQ people usually are detached from society because society and them don't understand each other, so they think we can all get along and whatnot.
People with average or somewhat high IQs are around people all the time, and they understand temptation, greed, laziness etc as constants of human nature. Those high IQ people that I mentioned think that we should get along because that's what is sensible to do, but they don't account that people gladly screw others for the benefit of themselves.
In short, you don't need only IQ to understand reality, you neec balls as well

>>131510778
>intellectuals, who are often utopians who live in their own upper-class bubbles,
They can simply afford to believe such ideas completely oblivious to the safety and the system which defined the reality they currently occupy, It's the ego in these people that also makes it impossible for them to ever admit they got lucky with circumstancxe instead always peddling myths of "muh hardwork" even when they simply inherited it all validating the idea that everyone is suffering due to their own failings when it's much more complicated than that. It's why when their ideologies surrounding things like mass migration fail they are so keen to blame everybody else for it going wrong rather than ever let that ego accept they are simply wrong about something.

>>131511562
>High IQ people usually are detached from society because society and them don't understand each other, so they think we can all get along and whatnot.

It's more a case of avoiding stupid people to avoid getting fucked over for someone else's benefit. That's how I feel about it at least.

lmao

Simple answer.

Left-wing ideas revolve around corporation and putting society above the individual. The result of this is advancement as demonstrated in the west.

Right-wing ideas revolve around individualism and giving people the freedom to damage the common good. The result is all the backward African and middle eastern society.

In short liberalism advanced society forward while conservatism regresses it. Makes sense that smart people would be liberal.

File: TNR1.jpg (26KB, 315x269px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 315x269px

>>131510778
that's right , they also feel well wallowing in the narcissism of the left wheather it is virtue-signalling to show off their 'sense of humane justice' or just feeling superior to the 'poor fools' who aren't as 'lofty and inspired' as them

>total BS (also they can't self-aware what they doing, 'intellectuals', right)

>>131511562
>High IQ people usually are detached from society because society and them don't understand each other, so they think we can all get along and whatnot.
>People with average or somewhat high IQs are around people all the time, and they understand temptation, greed, laziness etc as constants of human nature.

No the High IQ people recognize the problems of society but realize that is no excuse to not act. Imperfect solutions tend to be better than no solutions.

It's the low IQ people that say " this isn't perfect so don't do anything."

>>131506357
>Why do People of higher Intellect tend to be far left?

They don't. Most people you meet with IQ > 150 tend to be political centrists. They do tend to be more altruistic in an "above the fray" type of way. If they're "leftist" in any way, it's because they have empathy for societal outliers. Understandably so, because "smart people" aren't generally welcome on either side of the artificial right/left divide.

They don't. You're cherry picking.

>>131506357
>>131506605
This.

Also a lot of extremely high iq people who don't apply that high iq to find economic success get frustrated by the idea of a society where the hardest working get rewarded more and vouch for extreme ideas like communism or socialism. In the case of scientists like Einstein, they rarely take an interest in politics beyond a basic level, and without proper examination the idea of a happy fun socialist utopia becomes achieveable.

>>131511381
>Ever wonder why the US has never had a single party in power for more than 2 terms
Wrong, H.W Bush was elected after Reagan's 2 terms, and Roosevelt was elected 4 times and his successor Truman was elected 1 time, with a total of 5 terms of consecutive Dem rule. I'm sure there are a few more times in the 19th or 18th centuries that I can't remember.

>>131511745
They go on self-imposed isolation, when have you ever seen a 160+ IQ guy with a lot of friends?
More often than not they are complete aliens related to the general masses.

File: IMG_6644.jpg (16KB, 138x99px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 138x99px

>>131506357
Marxist philosophers are the incredibly overrated. Satre supported mao

>>131506751
shitty book, anarcho-terrorists got BTFO like the scum they are

>>131512052
The main problem facing US's budget today is welfare and medicaid, which drain 55% of our budget and feed to to absolute parasites.
Where the fuck is the majority of the high IQ intellectuals advocating otherwise? There is none, cause they don't have the stones to admit that some people don't deserve to breathe air

>>131506357
Because they are smart enough to realize their frail little bodies and wills cannot compete in open markets outside of academia

>>131507751
Joseph Goebbels.

Erwin Rommel.

Karl Doenitz.

Most truly high iq people, i.e 155+, don't really apply their intellects in a pragmatic feild, instead defaulting to quaternary economic activities (physics, math, etc).

And pretty much every US president would be considered right wing economically, so we could throw in some of the top IQ ones as well.

>>131506751
Stop whitewashing catalonia. It descended into vigilantism. Just because ideological murder wasnt on the scale of stalin doesn't mean it didn't happen.

And of course, as a stereotypical example of anarchism, they couldn't defend themselves against an invading force

File: Screenshot_2017-06-27-14-32-19.jpg (50KB, 1110x338px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1110x338px

>>131506357
MIDGET MASTER RACE!

>>131512052
perfectionism and its failures are high IQ traits, not low

>>131506357
Because they don't know how to make money. Smart conservatives are the rich ones

>>131506357
Because intelligence doesn't equal wisdom. People with high IQ spent more time learning/accompanying other smart people (used to be uni, etc before education went to shit).
They never had much contact with the real world, thus they are just unable to imagine e.g. That refugees are not in majority peace loving and productive.
They think others are just like them because they learned that in uni and because they are smart, they think they can't be wrong anyways.
They are too idealistic because they don't know hardship and unfairness.

>>131512597
>The main problem facing US's budget today is welfare and medicaid, which drain 55% of our budget and feed to to absolute parasites.

Okay then cut off the welfare and let the citizens revolt. French Revolution 2.0.

Regardless you will always have a class of people below the mean in a society that will be tempted to revolt if their living conditions are too low. So the govt will always be forced to appeal a certain segment of the population. This was true in the roman era and it is still true today.

>Where the fuck is the majority of the high IQ intellectuals advocating otherwise? There is none, cause they don't have the stones to admit that some people don't deserve to breathe air

Do you deserve to breathe? What if someone smarter than yourself says that you don't deserve to live.

>>131506840
This goes both ways though

>>131511943
Alright, I'll take the bait. The liberalism that advanced the west was a heavily individualist ideology, whereas modern liberalism is nothing but social-liberalism (any oxymoron in itself) and has little to do with the classical liberalism and is more like socialism than anything else. If collectivist ideologies are so good, then how come communism was such a failiure of gigantic proportions but capitalism and (classical) liberalism so successful? And as a final footnote, the chaotic and failed states in the Middle East and Africa has been ruled by socialist parties for decades. Blaming anything else than collectivist policies for their failiures is nothing short of retarded.

Well. Statistically it's true that right wing is less educated, less well off, lives in rural/suburban areas, presumably they have lower IQ but I think there is no research on that as it could be perceived as discriminating. Academics are heavily biased to the left aswell.

IQ has nothing to do with wisdom
Many of the intellectual giants from the ancient world would be considered right wing today, including Aristotle and his followers, Confucius, the Legalists of ancient China, Saint Augustine, and so on.
Left and Right are just whichever side of the zeitgeist you're on. Wisdom and real world experience are far more valuable than esoteric thought experiments. This is in part why Stoicism and Epicurianism were more popular in Rome than Platonism, and indeed why Christianity and Islam took over from the indigenous religions and rituals of the ancient world. Even Mencius and Xunzi, the two greatest Confucian thinkers after Confucius himself, disagreed on the state of human nature and Confucius in general, and this was in part because Xunzi had much more experience in statecraft than Mencius, and indeed even more experience in governmental affairs and nationbuilding than even Confucius himself.

>>131507096
>on top of the dominance hierarchy in their society
>surprisingly high iq
really?

File: IMG_2048.gif (29KB, 482x800px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 482x800px

>>131507628
very noice

>>131506605
this. high IQ leftists are less likely to have things to do and more likely to be attention-seeking faggots.

All the cultural references saw the jew and degeneracy at some point:

Voltaire, Shakespeare, Dickens, Quevedo...

File: Right at the top as always.jpg (33KB, 226x346px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 226x346px

>>131506357
Why is the NY Times bestsellers list always right leaning? We uneducated folk apparently like to read.

>>131513340

>The liberalism that advanced the west was a heavily individualist ideology, whereas modern liberalism is nothing but social-liberalism (any oxymoron in itself) and has little to do with the classical liberalism

The classical regimes of monarchy or theology where for all intents and purposes totalitarian regimes that maximized the welfare of the people in power, with status; kings, knights, clergy, aristocracy, etc. From a conversation point of view this is completely legit because it's people acting in their own best interest and since govt. intervention is bad, nothing can or should be done to change this.

The liberals at the time disagreed with that and wanted to change the system to benefit more power, essentially redistribute political power. They accomplished this with acts such as the Magna Carta. The freedom to speak against the King or the Pope is exactly the same as the freedom to speak for civil rights or gay marriage.

The greatest of the west politically has been from decentralizing power from an upper class with nepotism and distributing it to the lower class through meritocracy.

The reason "communist" and "socialist" nations failed is because they became what they hated, totalitarian regimes

Tl;DR; The West is the most prosperous society and the most liberal too. Not a coincidence.

>>131513250
>Okay then cut off the welfare and let the citizens revolt. French Revolution 2.0.

Regardless you will always have a class of people below the mean in a society that will be tempted to revolt if their living conditions are too low. So the govt will always be forced to appeal a certain segment of the population. This was true in the roman era and it is still true today.

The normal rate of parasites in a healthy society is low, we have way more than we should have.
The welfare problem arises because people don't have much jobs, which corporations always outsource. I don't see high IQ people raving about that, but I see them raving 24/7 about climate change and other things.
Yes there will be people below the means, but in a healthy society they are few and far between with most people insuring a good living standart, and if thet try to revolt they will be put down by their compatriots long before the state is needed. People revolt when they are in the dirt, they don't revolt needlessly.
As far as breathing goes, I do contribute to society, and most important this is a society that allows contribution freely. People that waste air are they that have the potential to contribute but don't cause they are too lazy, dragging everyone down.

High IQ doesn't neccessarily mean they are critical thinkers or not susceptible to influence from other people. I'd even go as far as to say they surround themselves with other intelligent people they respect, who may hold certain believes they simply adopt.

>>131506357
sartre was a fuckwit, kamus was far more intriguing

>>131506978

ahahahahahahahaa

>>131515021
>The welfare problem arises because people don't have much jobs, which corporations always outsource. I don't see high IQ people raving about that, but I see them raving 24/7 about climate change and other things.

Capitalism has a built-in check value. If the price of labor in country A is higher than country B then jobs will flow from A -> B. Capitalism doesn't care about nationalism and providing jobs in your country exclusively.

The reason high IQ people don't complain about jobs is because they have jobs because they used their high IQ to do well in the educational system.

>Yes there will be people below the means, but in a healthy society they are few and far between with most people insuring a good living standart, and if thet try to revolt they will be put down by their compatriots long before the state is needed. People revolt when they are in the dirt, they don't revolt needlessly.

How do you decide the percentage? Is it just your gut feeling? If the number of unhealthy was really too high then wouldn't we already have the cleansing? Maybe the current number isn't high enough.

>As far as breathing goes, I do contribute to society, and most important this is a society that allows contribution freely. People that waste air are they that have the potential to contribute but don't cause they are too lazy, dragging everyone down.

What if my definition of contributing is lower than yours?

>>131515321
He has a 140+ IQ. But he is an old man now, you got to factor being senile as well

>>131506357
They're out of touch with reality and will rationalise themselve to death, creating a utopian theory that cannot work

>>131506831
Adolf Hitler

>>131506357
They believe their own bullshit, because they're always able to come up with good rational answers. They just don't realise that rationalism is a big fat lie that somehow has gripped the world.

>>131506831
Wagner, Heidegger.

>>131506357
Because left is the right way to go. The only way for society to prevail.

Now watch these retards scream and wail about some dumbass purple haired chick in glasses, pretending she represents anyone they disagree with.

File: image.jpg (59KB, 564x656px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 564x656px

>>131506831
aristotle. actually most ancient greeks, who laid the foundations for everything, would freak out anyone accustomed to liberalism.

Hume was a tory. nietzsche. jordan peterson.

liberalism was invented only a few centuries ago. that means the brilliance of human progress for millennia was right wing, or at the very least categorized off the spectrum. but it definitely wasn't "leftist."

>>131506831
Roger Scruton, Nietzsche.

I have an IQ of 136 and am a fascist.

>>131515419
Capitalism exists within a larger structure, which is the state.
I get your logic, but you got to know that you can't outbid free a.k.a slavery. So we just give up good salaries, 8 hour workshifts and worker's right so just we can compete? Do you have any idea of the blood that has been shed to provide generations with those kind of rights? So we should all throw them under the bus because capitalism?
In every crisis there are people that eat well, but the measure of a crisis is how many people eat well, and a system where an overwhelming majority isn't eating well is doomed to fail.
I don't decide contribution, in a fair society you get back what you give, but we all get something off our earnings for the less unfortunate, not the fortunate that doesn't want to work.

Intelligence doesn't protect you from brainwashing

>>131516192
and then aristotle went out back and fucked a 10 year old boy

god bless

>>131516342
Very true but it helps to put things into perspective when you're getting redpilled and you start to add up all the lies they've been telling you all this time.

File: 354deaa3770912621bb816da070346ab.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

>>131506357
>Orwell? The guy who did 1984? Are you sure about him?

>Found the kike

File: Screenshot_2017-06-27-22-17-31-1.png (211KB, 480x269px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 480x269px

>>131509491
I like the way you think.

>>131516272
>bragging about sub genius level iq on the internet
wew that sure strengthens your arugment
>>131516017
It's equally ridiculous to be a post modernist

>>131506357
I think you're mistaking intellectualism for high IQ.
High IQ right wing people don't become faggot intellectuals. Right wing personalities would not enjoy sitting in some ivory tower writing essays and theses about theoretical garbage that has no real world implications.
Right wing people tend to be the ones running the world and doing shit instead of just sitting in a room in some dark corner of the Humanities building in an Ivy League school coming up with elaborate and eloquent critiques of a system they think they understand.

>>131516275
>Capitalism exists within a larger structure, which is the state.

Capitalism is a completely separate concept from the nation-state.

>I get your logic, but you got to know that you can't outbid free a.k.a slavery. So we just give up good salaries, 8 hour workshifts and worker's right so just we can compete?

I realized this too which why I no longer support free market capitalism. It's vital to have certain barriers to protect quality of life. However it's also important to know that capitalism is try to destroy these barriers and it will win in the long run. For this reason, it's important to build a next generation economy while you outsource the current jobs.

The liberals are more on this than the free market conservatives ironically with their policies to stimulate green energy for instance.

>Do you have any idea of the blood that has been shed to provide generations with those kind of rights? So we should all throw them under the bus because capitalism?

Providing people with rights is very liberal. Conservative don't believe they need to provide anyone with rights cuz they already have all the rights they could ever want.

>In every crisis there are people that eat well, but the measure of a crisis is how many people eat well, and a system where an overwhelming majority isn't eating well is doomed to fail.

Well that's exactly what we already have in the west today. If you move to a large city then you will have opportunities. Objectively speaking we have the most opportunity then any point in history. You want to start your own business? Go right ahead. Want to attend college? No problem, we have plenty.

The only people complaining about opportunities are those people who have failed to adapt to the 21st economy, ironically the same rednecks pushing for unfettered free market capitalism while failing to recognize it will destroy their small city community.

>>131507614
>le ebin emotional liberals meme

>>131506820

Leftists are the biggest tribalists in the usa, they take away freedoms like nobodiea business

>>131508334
>Because they want to elevate and distinguish themselves from the unwashed masses by being as different from them as possible

Uh, no. They actually go out of their way to fit into normieville. You're the edgy retard.

File: dick.jpg (234KB, 1200x797px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 1200x797px

>>131517217
daily reminder that George Bush and Dick Cheney took away more rights than anybody else in America using 9/11 as a huge opportunity to make big HaliburtonBux and get us in a neverending "war on terror"

it was pretty brilliant how they got the American people in all their hysteria to get behind the Patriot Act

>>131507886
>Marxism
>common
*tips tinfoil*
>>131510547
Out of the self-proclaimed Marxist-Leninist states, none of them are in Africa. Even if you look at countries with high representation of communist parties, most African countries aren't communist-dominated. That's a right wing meme.
>All of the Angolan Civil War was communist
Are you blind?

>>131506357
Because the left has a monopoly on university education and the media continues to push the illusion of the left being more intellectual later on. Most of the intelligent leftists *are* intelligent, but they're weak when it comes to independent thinking.

>>131506357

It is not harder to indoctrinate a high IQ person than a low one.
In fact it can be easiest depending on your strategy.

>>131517433
>whataboutism

nope, we are talking about leftists.

>>131506357
I never understood why Sartre was a communist.
Capitalism is more attuned to the ideals of existentialism than communism: a need to suffer and struggle, individuality, personal responsibility.
It doesn't make sense.

Oscar Wilde was left because he was a fag, Einstein because he was a kike.
Often lauded intellectuals are kikes because their communities are set up for the promotion and advancement of one another, and for a while they've been running the dialog in the west.
Wilde, like many other writers and creators, was prone to decadence and degeneracy. These people refuse to look at the consequence of their extreme comfort and trend towards a left that won't shame them.

File: Image.jpg (55KB, 900x677px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 900x677px

>>131517853
>These people refuse to look at the consequence of their extreme comfort and trend towards a left that won't shame them.
Correct

>>131507093
This. Every significant leftist intelectual fails.to factor human nature into their work. Its why these ideologies always collaps on themselves. It is betond me why leftist and socialist of any kind continue trying to put the circle in the square.

>>131511164
Came here to post this.

John von Neumann was a right winger, and his IQ was one of the highest

>>131508251
Marxists don't have any core beliefs, ausfag. The basic tenets are constantly changing.

>>131506831
jon von neumann
>most productive and prolific mathematician/physicist of the 20th century who made the most groundbreaking advancements to the greatest number of fields. During a Senate committee hearing he described his political ideology as "violently anti-communist, and much more militaristic than the norm."
Milton friedman
>nobel prize winning economist. Friedman was an advisor to Republican U.S. President Ronald Reagan[14] and Conservative British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.[15] His political philosophy extolled the virtues of a free market economic system with minimal intervention.
henry kissinger
>ran american foreign policy for 8 years between 1969 and 1977. widely regarded as most effective secretary of state of 20th century.
garry kasparov
>world champion of chess from 1986-2005 for all but 3 months. extremely critical of socialist policies such as those adopted by bernie sanders.
Robert Mercer
>computer scientist, early developer of artificial intelligence who ran quantitative, pattern-recognition based hedge fund rennaissance technologies, most successful and consistent hedge fund in history, earned 39% on average per year between 1989 and 2006. Is currently major financial supporter of breitbart , created pro trump super pac.
nassim nicolas taleb
>former managing director at UBS and at multiple other institutions working in derivatives arbitrage, now professor of risk engineering at NYU and co-editor in chief of the journal Risk and Decision Analysis , also author of best selling risk and decision theory books like black swan and anti-fragile. favoured trump over hilary.

These "high iq" libtards aren't going to survive the coming apocalypse they're so ingeniously created. They are just about smart enough to win the Darwin award.

File: image.jpg (155KB, 905x1024px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 905x1024px

>>131516377
>aristotle is obsolete because I once heard he did something immoral.
>If you ever use logic or empiricism ever again you support child molesters.
you are not going to get very far. but then again, just yell really loudly and only make appeals to emotion and people might listen to you. but they'll tend to be inarticulate themselves and suffering from a victim complex.

>>131507877
>>131507981
>>131515978
>Heidegger

after WWII called his involvement with Nazism "a blunder" and lived in the woods the rest of his life as a hermit

>>131511164
you're proving the opposite. ~130 might be high for an average person, but not for rulers, even bill clinton had an iq of 156

>>131506831
Palmer Luckey

File: 1406944473683.jpg (111KB, 468x714px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 468x714px

>>131519177
>After the war
Of course he would

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integralism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volksgemeinschaft

"The spiritual world of a people is not the superstructure of a culture any more than it is an armory filled with useful information and values; it is the power that most deeply preserves the people’s earth- and blood-bound strengths as the power that most deeply arouses and most profoundly shakes the people’s existence."
Heidegger

>>131506357

They're indoctrinated tools of academia and/or the state.

Also when you're genius level IQ it makes sense to pus leftist ideas that essentially ensure a permanent ruling class and a permanently dependant slave class that feeds off the middle class.

Poor and middle class gets tied together and the bridge between middle and upper is severed.

Because most leftist tend to stay in the academic world and never leave it in their entire life while right people actually do something productive with their life, and most leftist also need self validation and crave attention so they take IQ tests and takes it as some sort of accomplishment while people that tend to be right know that it hold no true meaning and don't even bother with it.

>>131506357

This question is like going back 5 centuries and asking "Why are the only literate people in Europe Christians?!" and the answer is because Christianity controlled all the higher centres of learning and kicked anybody out who did not conform. The same is true of progressivism today. All academics and thinkers hostile to leftism are immediately purged, which is why all our best rightist thinkers come from outside the academy.

>>131506452
this, here's the proof (at least in the US)

1) There's a > 0.9 correlation between income and iQ
2) Donald Trump (along with other Republican candidates) constantly win every voting block that earns more than 30k/yr
3) Therefore since IQ and income are correlated higher IQ people vote for republicans.

Q.E.D

>>131506357

theorists tend to be left wing. They weigh abstract thinking over practical problem solving.

Albert Einstein was a theoretical physicist.

Conservative physicists like Edward Teller didn't get along with left wing commie physicists.

The problem with science is the amount of people that get into it with intentions of giving weight to their political agenda.

A young SJW feminist may enter a PhD program wanting to prove the existence of 20,000 genders in nature and will subsequently twist the facts to support her agenda. This is how you get "muh Bonobo sexuality."

>>131506357

Practical science and engineering makes you conservative over time. Minds are geared towards problem solving.

"The quickest way between two points is a straight line."

"I've got no time to fuck around, I'm on a schedule."

Engineers in the private sector, research scientists in Big Pharma, etc... those guys tend to be right wing.

Left wing attracts social scientists, theorists, and people who don't have to make a living creating technology, applicable ideas, etc.

Why isn't Moldbug mandatory reading on /pol/?

Read his "Letter to Open-Minded Progressive", it will solve this question once and for all.

This guy >>131521141 has the right idea.

>>131521909
>1) There's a > 0.9 correlation between income and iQ

No there isn't, the correlation's like 0.5-0.6

Still pretty high, but a difference of like 50% of the explained variance

>>131519353
This

t. natsoc

>>131512782
He had regular threesomes and fucked 18 year old pussy, won the Nobel Prize but rejected it, and will forever have his place in human history.

What have you done lately?

IQ is about change and adaptability and how well you solve new puzzles in new ways. IQ was always a test about how good of a lefty you are.

Conservatism is about moral/ethical/physical strength and adherence to traditional virtues and established laws.

IQ does not test that stuff. Your common exam is an example of a conservative test.

>>131506357
Only leftists would shoehorn their IQ into conversations like that. Intelligent rightwingers are going to be less annoying about it.

The media doesn't like right wing scientists and engineers.

The first dudes on the moon... top of the line White Boi's. Buzz Aldrin went to MIT and is conservative.

Edward Teller, dude behind the H bomb, conservative.

The accomplishment, inventions, and intellect of conservative scientists and engineers are never celebrated in the MSM. The social scientists hate them for being smarter than them,

Why are they going to the moon and making nukes instead of promoting "change and shiet?"

>>131506357
Never mind the fact that they tend to be utterly delusional and batshit insane.

I'm reading this great book right now. It's called Character Disturbance. But you probably wouldn't see yourselves in it for the afore-mentioned reasons. Pity.

>>131524479

that's incorrect. Leftists are the least adaptable. They promote change without understanding the implications.

A lefty is faced with a famine. Lefty decides to tell everyone to learn to eat less.

A right is faced with a famine... he starts looking for water, he starts digging a canal, he looks for better grain.

Look at how liberals handle an energy crisis. Liberals are sitting on a mountain of coal and can't make enough electricity. They tell everyone to use less electricity.

A conservative would build a coal plant and start burning the mountain of coal.

Liberals have a problem with linear and practical thinking. It's always wrong for them.

This is why they hate the molecular reality of the human body and the fact DNA only codes for 2 sexes.

>>131509045
anarcho-communism is an oxymoron, if you don't believe me read anything by Friedrich von Hayek

>>131506831
Buckley rip, he was one of the best

Smart people don't go around talking about how smart they are. All I see are leftists bragging about their so called intelligence. Leftist are arrogant retards with serious cases of dunning kruger

People with high iqs are more likely to go to college. Colleges are leftist indoctrination centers. That, and you have to be an idiot to support what's considered right wing the US.

>>131525679
>Hayek
>sensible
Sure. Any day now Sweden and Norway will turn into North Korea because of the Road to Serfdom amirite?

>>131506357
A big part is because they grow disconnected with the average population so they have very poor references to decide how to run things.

That's why most "intelectuals" are pro-immigration, because they don't have to deal with the minimum common denominator of the immigrants, but rather just the sofisticated ones. Then, the working class, has to go back home and see their blocks and neighbourhoods trashed and have to cope with the bulk of the crime committed by these people.

>>131506357
because we arent fucking stupid like the rest of you.

IQ is pseudoscience and if you believe that putting shapes in order is an objective measure of intelligence and base your self worth on your ability to do so, then you got jewed fucking hard.

>>131512213
>Also a lot of extremely high iq people who don't apply that high iq to find economic success get frustrated by the idea of a society where the hardest working get rewarded more
No you are incorrect,

>the most selfish scam artists get rewarded more
I fixed it for you.

This is how it works, you get a high IQ, you think 'the worlds pretty shit look at this', you are either a selfish asshole and take advantage of it, or you try to suggest alternatives.

The problem is those alternatives then get coopted by other selfish assholes. This is why democracy is bad, the general population are too stupid to really know one way or another, they will vote based on feelings 'muh traditionalism, muh taxes' or 'muh progressivism, muh equality', both of which are just following buzzwords and being lead around by said selfish assholes.

Every now and then though the people who want to fix things start killing the selfish assholes.

>>131506357
Because you're only thinking of people from the 20th century when Marxism was in vogue

>>131506452
Uhm, no, sweetie :)

>>131523458
he's just a spergtard jew that hates himself because he knows he will ally with his people and should be gassed.

>>131506831
Kevin B. MacDonald and E. Michael Jones

>>131526208
>this measure isn't valid
>correlates perfectly with life success

uh huh

>>131526331
does your mom know you are posting with that flag? shameful.

>>131506831
nietzsche
hoppe
mises
hayek
rand
mill
heidegger
solschenizyn
peterson
molyneux

>>131506357
You're cherrypicking a few examples. I could cherrypick high IQ far-right wingers such as Evola or hell, Plato.

We know that in USA right now right wingers have a higher average income, but that leftists have higher education. Its likely that leftists have degree mill diplomas or humanities degrees, while right wingers have either high paying jobs or practical well-paying jobs.

File: 1476378523349.png (580KB, 862x890px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 862x890px

>Get paid a six figure salary for doing anything your tenured ass likes
>Vote to continue government funding in extremis in everything
It's not difficult to work out. Even Thomas Sowell ended up fulfilling the cliche. They get addicted to government money.

>>131526639
If you want non-philosopher examples, then off my head, Ford and Fischer

>>131526569
Not really, but I'm sure she'll be okay with it.

>>131506357
All those you mentioned aren't exceptionally special people. Wilde and Einstein were plagiarizing bastards who acted like they did to gain notice in the public eye and make a living. Orwell was just a whiny bluepilled cuck.

>>131526513
In that case, all of the people on here who claim to be 130+ should be millionaires and not broke as fuck NEETs like 97% of /pol/ is.

>>131506357
socially forced into it.
snowball effect

>Orwell
>one of the biggest critics of Communism and Stalinism
>far left

wot. He was a centre-left democratic socialist.

Also
>Nietzsche
>Stirner
>JS Mill
>Adam Smith
>David Hume
>John Locke

Plenty of non-left intellectuals.

>>131506357
Because everyone would have it a lot easier under a united world government.

File: communist rain dance.jpg (88KB, 659x756px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 659x756px

>>131506357
>Why do People of higher Intellect tend to be far left?

Because they tend to live in institutions like university campuses and rarely have to live with the consequences of leftist policy like the working class.

The university in essence a right-wing institution with a left-wing creche inside of it.
They are very rich companies who compete vigorously for student tuition bucks, and in return offer a saccharine view of multiculturalism to appease both their employees(professors) and the students.

In the university, there is almost no competition for work or resources or food or shelter, so you see less tribalism. You may think that BLM might qualify but on campus they have much less effect than in working class areas where they are materially destructive.

Which is why far-left thinkers can still think BLM is a "good" thing - because they don't have to live with the consequences of the very ideas and groups they promote.

They are far-left because they live in Utopia, and are largely ignorant of how the rest of the world works.

People like Orwell, who served in the army in the colonies saw the nasty effects of capitalism so bought into the what the sheltered far-left was promoting. He turned rat in the end when he realized how insidious and Utopian their ideas were and made a list of commies he turned over to MI-5.

>>131506831

Pound, Eliot, Primo de Rivera, Heidegger, WF Buckley, Goldwater

>>131506357
>be smart
>realize retards are all left leaning and will give me funding, accolades, do what their told, believe everything I say and give in to all my needs if I align with them and tell them what they want to hear

Man, it's hard being "left".

I have to disagree. The leftists in our country are plain stupid.
Center>right wing>left wing>radical right wing>radical left wing

Basically goes like that when it comes to being smart here.

>>131506357
because if u are smart and liberals offer you money, youd have to be a retard to not join them in exchange for removing yourself from the slave caste through joining them

everygoy has a price

>>131506357

George Orwell wasn't far left, all his best work was criticizing the far left.

>>131527171
Tribalism usually indicates extreme stupidity. Someone who's not a blithering idiot prefers modern hierarchical structures (chain of command, corporate hierarchy, academics, you name it). Tribalism really only works for those who don't know any better.

>>131506357
They don't understand how much less intelligent the average person is than they are. Leftism would be fine if everyone in the world had a 150+ IQ.

>>131519177
He would say that wouldn't he!

>>131527769
Leftism wouldn't exist if everyone in yhe world had 150+ IQ.

Intelligent people tend to learn from past mistakes

>>131519166
>missing the point this hard
how retarded can you be

File: 1469885075186.jpg (53KB, 355x336px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 355x336px

>>131527211
You keep saying that, but every /pol/ user who's not a conservative/nationalist/free market believer usually gets derided by a semi-organized circlejerk, every single one of their points drowned in repetitive shit. This holier than thou attitude is the icing on the shitcake. I think you're scared of being opposed.

>>131527482
>Tribalism is the state of being organized in or an advocate for a tribe
Where does that imply they can't have modern hierarchical structures?

>>131506357
It's not true that higher intellect people tend to be liberal. Rather, it's the opposite. It's that the liberal intellectuals get the most attention from the media.

>>131506357
I think you'll find they turn out to be deluded
>centre right - would take a public iq test against you any day faggot, 147 here

>>131528158
At the point where they decide to behave like a tribe.

George Orwell left??? Hmmm!

>>131527918

More like if we were all that intelligent we could have a true minarchist, even anarchist society.

Once you remove the necessity for government then the context for left/right disappears.

>>131506357
all these people pushed boundaries which put them in the cross hairs of local conservative government, so it was personal, which made them politically involved

But Conservatives are also incapable of seeing the big picture and making connections between different subjects, which is what being intelligent is at its heart

>>131528257
They would still have chiefs,producers,gathers ect.

>>131528300

Orwell was very much left, but nowhere near far left.

>>131527918
There have been plenty of geniuses who were lefties. They don't understand the differences between their nature and the human nature of the general population. 100 IQs can't beat their game theory programming, so they fuck shit up if given the opportunity.

File: freemasons.jpg (34KB, 318x320px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 318x320px

>>131506593

Human animals a.k.a. Goyim. Britain has the ruling class, their minions, then everyone else. Even today. Masonry is part of the feudal system. If your country has them, you are under it also.

>>131506978
Confeve.

>>131527918
Then why did Hitler invade Russia?

>>131506357
George Orwell fluctuated between poles but ended up hating the left
1984 is about a leftist state

Oscar Wilde was a pervert.

Einstein was in the science group think. At the time all top scientists believed that 'the communist system is the scientific system'. Really unless you study how utterly disgusting scientists are historically you can't even guess how badly dangerous and dishonest they are.

>>131506803
Whereas white people with an IQ of 75 are far right

>>131528490
Rich and successful leftists have a similar problem. They assume that the rest of society has the same drive to succeed as they do themselves. They can't wrap their brain around the fact that 90% of the population turn into sub human parasites when the nanny state steps in.

>>131527769
This was my problem for a long time, for a long time I assumed everyone else was as smart as me and it was holding me back professionally. But once I realized how dumb everyone else around me actually is it became very easy to deal with people and get ahead... especially when I realized most of these people actually believe themselves to be intelligent. It was just incomprehensible to me at the time.

>>131528959
that's wrong and ridiculous

File: MMP.jpg (17KB, 520x345px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 520x345px

>>131506357
Just finished Phenomenology of Perception, made me want to read Sartre. Probably should have done Sartre first actually.

>>131506357
Getting indoctrinated to be left doesn't mean you are of high intellect.
The days of university degrees meaning anything were over as soon as meme degrees with absurdly low requirements became the staple of the college diet.

File: 1463853201915.jpg (157KB, 460x558px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 460x558px

>>131528391
Bullshit. Tribal behavior is incompatible with modern life. I see this shit all the time at work. A pack of plebs can't deal with how insignificant and replaceable their life choices made them, so to boost their self-worth they gather around a would-be alpha male because he can smack his lips the hardest or whatever, they start annoying everyone, then the boss shows up and uses his four inch dick to slap the alpha male back into his place at the bottom of society. Plebs don't understand how the world works - but the sad fate of their disparaged pack leader gives them fuel for daft theories on how the world has been manipulated to treat them unfairly. Enter the right wing voter base and origins of nationalism. Fuck them all. If protecting the nation means allying with these fucktards, I vow to destroy every nation.

>>131529076
Th only head we can see inside of is our own. When a person is constantly paranoid about being robbed, they are most likely a thief. We map aspects of our own personalities to everyone else.

I'm extreme high trust. It took me forever to realize most people were untrustworthy.

>>131529132
Good argument. I concede.

>>131528854
Were you planning on making a point in that rambling nigger babble?

Smart people misunderstand and get things wrong all the time, but since they are smart they always believe they are correct.

I am smart and I believe this, therefore it is true.

proof of my statement.
http://www.dms.umontreal.ca/~andrew/PDF/VS.pdf

>>131529260

t. pencil neck who has trouble maintaining erections

File: Obersturmbannführer Fieri.png (915KB, 703x717px) Image search: [Google]

915KB, 703x717px

>>131506831

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZQJFbrqjUY&t=170s

>>131529615
Intelligence and Wisdom are different things. One can be smart but simultaneously know that, in the grand scheme of life they ultimately know nothing; There is always more to learn. You can always better yourself.

>>131516579
1984 is fantastic, gtfo!

People intelligent enough to see jews controlling the world and propaganda, so better go with them to get free amounts of money instead of being attacked by them as a conversvative.

They were intelligent, but not brave.

File: Yes i am a kike fight me faggots..jpg (57KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1920x1080px

all the science has been done by jews and lefties
even hitlers scientists were lefties
right wing rednecks have only had two get rich ideas in all of history and that is mining and slavery
if you not a jew or chink or leftie you are not smart

>>131530158
>only rednecks can be right wing
Get a load of this fuckin' guy.

>>131530158
Slavery is as old as humanity. You can't attribute it to modern political ideologies.

>>131530298
then tell my why your real rightwingers are spiting from your pesudo altlite garbage
>>131530433
prison systems in america budrose

>>131507202
i an 133 iq fag, still i cunt as one

>>131529777
Good point.

>>131530158
That's right goy. Jews aren't slavers.

>>131506831

The Nazi scientists that built our rockets during the space race

File: cucks.jpg (44KB, 852x930px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 852x930px

>>131530760
jews are con artists
but they have never held slaves
goyim

>>131530610
>prison blah blah
What does this even mean? Prison only exists under right-wingers? Removing criminals from society is slavery?

>>131530891
he was a leftie you waste you air
Stalinist and Nazism are literally the same thing

>>131530158

Politics in general is for brainlets who can't see the over-arching demographic, evolutionary, and social patterns determining it -- desperately trying to engage in it even though its as futile as pressing an elevator button which isn't plugged in. No eminent thinker dealing with the fundamental nature of the noumenal world is going to be concerned with a division of flesh-robots into two opposing camps based on their trait openness and trait agreeableness which in any case is a self balancing system with massive inertia.

File: stop being so edgy.jpg (415KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 900x600px

>>131529694
I hope thast one day, you will be old enough to be a spent, dried out geezer and wish your flaccid dick was the worst of your ailments. Then you will know and feel that power is a very, very fleeting thing. See how edgy and primitivist you'll be then, darling.

>it's a /pol/ think they're all undiscovered geniuses episode

Because they have more to lose if people don't agree with them

>>131506357
Because far left would be the best if the majority of people weren't shitbags. They are visionaries that see the world as it ideally should be. But as long as the average human is garbage it's just a fantasy.

>>131530919
You may need to do some research on the slave trade. Blacks and Muslims enslaved people, and then Jews and muslims transported those slaves to market. North American Whitey gets 200% of the blame for something he was barely involved in.

>>131517483
All of them have a socialist party just like everywhere else in the world, cause commies don't discriminate.

Its just that they're more inclined to speak out, write a book, go to protests because they feel really fucking important.

>>131529260
It is so sad what the Globalists did to you Germans.

>>131508732
>this is what braindead communists actually believe
Democrats are your average center to center left party

>>131531065
depends on the crime
our prison systems are the largest on earth
>>131531397
>"Blacks and Muslims enslaved people, and then Jews and muslims transported those slaves to market"
See the jew only transported them
>>131531150
Politics indeed is stupid but HURR RED VS BLUE!!!!!!!! *incoherent ape noises from both sides*

>>131531166

Enjoy living in self-righteous hate of men more masculine than you, just because you have slightly more computational capacity than them even though you use that capacity making yourself depressed thinking about them, while they are mindlessly but happily drifting around life on a cocktail of sex hormones and endorphins. Everyone grows old btw. You'll be a 70 year old geezer with reduced brain capacity as well, except you will have lived a boring life because you were judgmentally sitting on the sidelines, writing rants about how alpha males suck on the internet.

>>131506751
Homage To Catalonia was written years before Animal Farm. Some people evolve, accept it

>>131506357
It's quite simple, trash in, trash out. Plus they are heavily supported by the powers that be.

>>131506357
Because smart people know how to fill their own coffers and throw gibs to the peasants aka liberals and Jews.

>>131506357
Christopher Langley the smartest man in the world.

He is also a christian, suck it faggot.

File: Symbol-Of-Democracy.jpg (153KB, 729x729px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 729x729px

>>131506357
>George Orwell

Huh? He's an alt something conservative rightwing neonazi. I mean just read this:

" Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon -- so long as there is no answer to it -- gives claws to the weak. "

>>131506357
>why are the people pushed by the MSM as being "teh smartust ev4r!!!" all left wing extremists

Hmm, really makes you think.

File: tmp_20974-14982694053081324071895.jpg (69KB, 992x744px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 992x744px

>>131506357

they think they can help the world like Superman without super powers :)

>>131532444
/thread

>>131532444
> throw gibs to the peasants aka liberals and Jews.
the jews made the gibs you fucking retard
jews made the very medicines that keep murifats alive medicine
>>131532512
>literally who

>>131506939
Ability to empathize isn't correlated with intellect or political ideology.

>>131532789
>jews made the very medicines that keep murifats alive medicine
gonna need a source on that

>>131506357

Same reason they need help getting dressed and need to be reminded when to eat.

>>131506357
probably becuase they believe the easiest way to control people is by having the government be part of every single aspect of their lives. Personally I dont think people need to be controlled any more than they already are. We actually could benefit from less regulation in most sectors.

>>131526872
Einstein was an ethno-nationalist he was a Zionist

File: 1498361971115.gif (2MB, 202x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 202x360px

>>131532789
Are you fucking dumb? That's what I fucking said. Get off the American proxy you fucking mestizo. Let me take this slow Rodriguez...THE. JEWS. AND. LIBERALS. GIVE. SCRAPS. TO. PEASANTS. AND. GET. TO. KEEP. THE. REST.

>>131530158
No do you think fucking newton would approve of the modern day degeneracy ?

>>131506978
His IQ is one of the highest actually. All the haters and losers have to accept this.

>>131506357
Being intelligent isn't the same as being smart.

Funny how the lefties stopped shilling against IQ, BTW. They used to be all about that. And in a way, they were right. Just not all the way. Intelligence measures a set of skills, which correlate with certain innate characteristics. Stuff like problem solving.

But there's no intelligence test that goes "what is the best way to solve an economic crisis" for instance. And there's no intelligence test that also measures one's ability to deduct another person's mode of thought. That's one thing I notice about lefties: They assume that everyone else is like them, to the point where they reason even their enemies are just like them (i.e. true believers in socialism) and are simply evil bastards who want everything for themselves. They assume non-Western people are secretly Western liberals under a thin veineer of Islam/tribalism/etc. and Western oppression. They're only not Western because the West oppressed them, guys!

So yes, maybe leftists are slightly better at reasoning whether the next figure should have a black or white circle in place A or B. Big whoop.

Also, I'd like to have seen Sartre in the Soviet Union. Must be hard to scoop all the coal into the burner with a bad eye like that.

File: 1497238638957.png (203KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 500x500px

>>131506357
Libertarian chiming in.
I don't care what color your skin is as long as you're not some slimy AnCap with his fineprint NAP trying to declare war over trivialities.

>>131507812
Most aspies dont care about feelings enough to be leftist t. Aspie

>>131533247
I can opt for less regulation in most sectors
but there needs to be a chemistry sector in the goverment that keeps people from dumping things that kill the earth and poison waters. also the science for the energy sec
>>131533504
>"""throw gibs to the peasants aka liberals and Jews"""
thats not worded right buddy if you are say jew gives gibs
>>131533541
i dont even approve of it nor do kikes but we tolerate the faggotory to keep
from starting wars. you think we like the cringeworthy cancer?

>>131506644
No, just the Communism sounds good to dumb niggers. Left alone they are closer to feudalism. The chief is the king and owns all property. He gives out property in exchange for support to his closer advises the rest get nothing.

>>131534149
we have the best standards for clean water in the world right now. this doesnt need to change. Clean energy will be adopted as soon as it is actually viable. thats capitalism. people like to "go green" its actually a very attractive incentive for companies to create healthy and clean products.

>>131506357
Sill an argument from authority ,I've heard all the arguments from the left on race etc there all wrong saying huh dur we wuz intellectuals isn't either give me a fucking argument

>>131506357
why are you measuring intelligence by IQ and not by independence/size of family/value of assets? what is IQ other than a measure of how well leftists take tests made by other leftists?

>>131534248
the only way communism could remotely work if it was technocratic and somehow greed and stupidity was bred out of humans. that the objective of globalism sadly science fucked up by being too optimistic about human nature.
simply we failed because of Islamic goat fuckers had another idea

>>131506357

They're not. Niggers are almost exclusively left for example. Who aren't? Tomas Sowell and Ben Carson, possibly the smartest black people I've ever come across.

Neil DeGrasse Tyson is left because 1. He's being paid to be 2. He's an affirmative action babby who got through college because he could play basketball.

This is the case for all "intelligent" lefties, they hugely benefit financially from being so.

>>131535326
Aquafresh stop bunching all lefties up into the same group you fucking faggot.

>>131528722
his IQ is twice yours kiddo, pay attention, who else tweets and has entire countries talking about it and him all day long 25/8, you are eating out of his hand like a little bitch boy, he lives in your head rent free

>>131535660
more like the memetics of /pol/ lives in your head rent free buddy though something has to live in that empty void.

>>131528151
Says the German "give the Muslims the keys and let them do as they please" cuck

File: IMG_1880.jpg (59KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 640x640px

>>131533859

>>131510392
Haven't you figured out that Libertarianism is a failed ideaology?

It's natural evolution is fascism and the adoration of tradition.

Even Hoppe says you need a strong united ethnostate for free market capitalism to work.

>>131506357
Wisdom != intelligence

Oldest story ever told.