.

Had a conversation with someone over there. Pointed out that the story I linked mentioned Fox News had retracted a story as well, recently. Therefore they should be viewed in the same light as CNN when it came to journalistic integrity. They only wanted to focus on the fact that I turned their sarcastic remark back on them. Kek.

>>131506068
To add, these are most likely PR people. Their comments are mostly the same.

Probably shills.
Saged for posting a reddit thread.

He's completely right.

>>131505790
Shills aren't even trying anymore.

>>131506513
How

>>131506513
I disagree

>>131506777
Retracting a story, ie taking steps to fix what they consider a mistake shouldn't reflect poorly on an organization.That is like someone bumping into you, apologizing, and then you getting upset at the fact that they apologized.

Now if there is a pattern of retractions, that is another thing, because then there are genuine questions about credibility. Very occasional retractions in general suggest being credible more than not. In fact, the occasional retraction is less of a red flag than no retractions ever since no one is right 100% of the time, and if you claim to be so something is fishy.

>>131506513
If the story was true yeah he would be. Except these people weren´t hired by mistake, wasn´t running fake news anti-western propaganda for ZOG by mistake, the ONLY mistake here is that they got caught.

double-plus-kys

>>131506513
>>131506847
whoever is paying these fucks to try and salvage cnn's reputation with this crowd is fucking retarded. sage.