Is it true?

>>131443870
When have we ever had a candidate as left wing as bernie?

>>131444099
If you mean the US, FDR? LBJ? And they were presidents, not failed nominees

Basically the opposite, but your retarded for even trying to make a linear political spectrum.

>>131443870

Fucking not at all lol.

Assuming that is within the context of America, that would mean that no one in the US wants taxes and yet Bernie is a widely popular candidate (unfortunately) to the point you can legitimate argue he'd definitely beat Trump in the election if it was him vs. Trump (and not Hilary).

>>131445529
I dunno if I'd say that. He had a vocal fanbase online, but as we found out plenty of them were too young to vote and/or foreigners from Sweden or Germany.

Bernie appealed to niggers, spics, and college kids. These three groups have the worst voter turnout rates of all other demographics. Hillary appealed to older democrats who at least go out and vote.

>>131445287
Neck yourself, commie.

>>131443870

Literally the opposite is true.

>>131446847
>Bernie appealed to niggers and spics

What? Bernie had horrible appeal to minorities, it was literally what killed his campaign. The only people Bernie appealed to were upper-middle class white college students with student loan debt.

Do people actually believe this? cereal question.

>>131443870
This is going the wrong way

>>131446847

You have to also remember that the Democrats stole the Primary from Bernie to give it to Hillary. Hillary kept losing to Bernie in terms of the people's favor and she kept winning because the Democrat elite were on her sides. FFS, everyone expected Bernie to take CA and it was a total raging upset when Hillary unexpectedly took it.

Hillary was even blatantly shilling/copying Bernie's selling points prior to her winning. The Bernie vote was so powerful that they had to haggle with them ("Bernie will work with Hillary to make her more left leaning and guide her to better policies"), as opposed to the O'Malley vote that nobody really gave a fuck about.

OP here.

I'd argue there was some truth to it from 1980-2010 ("third way"), but I think there has been a shift away since.

>>131443870
its the complete opposite.
Left wing socialism is being normalized
while right wing policies are now frowned upon.
It only works if include authoritarianism as "fascist right" but I dare you to name one communist regime that operates without an authoritarian way of governing.

File: Hillary and the Black Vote.png (117KB, 500x522px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 500x522px

>>131447570

>Humiliate yourself for the rest of your life by allowing BLM to verbally abuse you and hijack your rally: making you look like a weak candidate to be leader of the US.
>Go out of your way to be appealing to the Black community.
>Still don't get the Black vote even despite Hillary clearly and shamelessly pandering for the Black vote.

Fucking pathetic.

File: The Left.png (12KB, 1435x594px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 1435x594px

>>131443870
More like this.

>>131447291
How the fuck can you possibly reach that conclusion?

>>131450356
Accurate

File: 1461432636171.gif (963KB, 450x253px) Image search: [Google]

963KB, 450x253px

>>131450356
Yep.

>>131450356
Bong has it right.

File: Pepe_punch.png (393KB, 785x757px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 785x757px

>>131444473
Wrong.
>FDR supports social security when the Social Security Covered Workers to Beneficiaries ratio was 1 to 159.4
The current ratio is 1 to 2.8 (5707% increase)
Sauce: https://www.ssa.gov/history/ratios.html

The idea that liberals have moved right is fucking absurd and isn't supported by any fucking data.

>>131443870
where does the "alt- right" and "alt- light" fit in
some kind of parallell track?
should this be a 3d model?

>>131443870
I wish.

>>131450356
/thread