Here is a question for the nazi christians.
Why is it better for Christianity to be exclusive to a race or culture? Why should we, to preserve Christianity, band together based on culture and throw out non-believers? Isn't that inhumane and will prevent the non-believers from turning to God?
If you aren't going to throw the non-believers out, what are you going to do with them? How are you going to guarantee they won't spread sin?
> inb4 cultural separation will save more that it will lose
How will you guarantee that your children and the people in your reich will stay christian and hold on to Christian values?
>Throw out nonbelievers.
Himmler was pagan, Hitler didn't throw him out did he?
>>131406198
Religion exists as a means of state control. Hitler would have likely eventually changed the state religion of Nazi Germany to the worship of Atlantean Aryans had he won the war.
He personally was quoted as saying, "You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"
>>131406604
i'm not talking to you fedora.
I'm asking the christian nazis here.
>>131407050
And I gave you an answer. Christianity is incompatible with a National Socialist state in the long term. Hitler himself SAID AS MUCH.
Nazism may have been developed by Christians, but it is very far removed from the teachings of Christ.
>>131406306
ok well how would you prevent people like charles darwin popping up and making all the white kids atheist?