https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VG_s2PCH_c
previous threads:
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/117388627/
[Search: 59opgJ8B]
https://youtu.be/ireHDmMU3io
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/04/14/groundbreaking-china-study-links-immune-activation-by-vaccination-autism/
A study out of China is the first to test the effects of immune activation by vaccination (hep B/BCG) on brain development in rats. Results indicate vaccines containing an aluminum adjuvant (i.e., hep B) spike cytokine levels in the hippocampus region of the brain, in particular the cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6),the key cytokine known for its dysregulating effect on neuronal circuitry and the key cytokine implicated in autism.
http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-02-28-google-censorship-of-natural-news-statement-from-the-health-ranger.html
comic relief: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntWieh7YIgY&feature=youtu.be
Of course it's a fucking german
Your links are in no way credible, show me something from nature and then I'll listen.
>inb4 ((((shill1!!!11!!1!)))
Put your spirit crystals down and act like an adult
>>131372829
I actually ended up appreciating the video, pretty good coverage for both sides. Made the screenshot with dislike early on...
That said:
>politifact
>character assassination based on appearance
>erecting ridiculous strawman to distract the argument
>covering over this kind of deceptive argument with a switch to appeal to laughter to cement the segment,
>leave the made text-visual-speech associations settled and concluded in laughter
>switch to new reasonable beginning after derisive laughter of showing kid rock with a condom, ie. thoroughly and progressively degrade the opposition to the point of open laughter, then bring up a seemingly reasonable/official argument as starter
>basic text, simple logo, "vast majority" ie. appeal to authority/consensus rather than basic science
>no rebuttal to content of Vaxxed documentary and CDC coverup on MMR vaccine
>mothers: "There's just so much information and i don't know who to ask..."
>enclose the vaccination question with other strawmen "should you vaccinate?, should you eat the placenta?, should you let kids cry?"
>answers the question for you "yes, no, absolutely"
>>131373744
Maybe he's just restricted to the format ie. he has to make it this way, like he makes all the other videos in order to appeal to an audience with short attention span
but something tells me there is something rotten in the state of denmark
why doesn't he mention that vaccine companies regularly pay out damages?
or that vaccines are not under the same rubric of regulatory standard as other pharmaceuticals?
These are the same politicians who have had no moral qualms in destabilizing the middle east and driving the "refugees" into our nations, and then censoring our complaints for such policies...
"memes aren't facts"
"facts" aren't facts, john.
Memes are facts on a level which "facts" are not.
18:00
>"number of antigens has decreased"
by how much?
>"thousands of antigens"
of what class? of what function?
it's like saying thousands of "chemicals"
if one of them is cyanide, the recipient will die. if one is something else, potential brain damage results... ie. thousands of innocuous antigens are not a problem, one neurotoxin IS a problem.