why is this picture so hard to understand for right wing retards?

>>131342503

>>131342503
They can't read?

File: One_million.png (90KB, 1112x1112px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1112x1112px

400 parts per million are going to destroy us all

Ok, so let's say it's true. How does giving money to China with "green" corporations taking a cut help this?

If that doesn't help, what do you propose we do?

File: co2_ppm.jpg (2MB, 2220x2220px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2220x2220px

>>131342671

>>131342503

Why don't you do something about it then?

If every climate change believer stopped using power and buying new shit, you'd help a lot.

But no, you want to virtue signal and throw money at things that won't work

>>131342671
Try drinking 400 parts per million cyanide.

>>131342503
That's because the earth isn't round you dummy-crat.

>>131342503
Go fight China and the over population of 3rd world countries if you don't like it.

>global warming kills 2/3 population.
>the strong and clever will survive
>global warming fixes itself

What's so bad about the global warming meme?

File: 1498442094844.png (426KB, 698x412px) Image search: [Google]

426KB, 698x412px

>>131342503
why is this one so hard for you to understand? i mean its pixels on a computer screen so it must be true

>>131342816
>implying drinking cyanide and CO2 dissovled in the atmo are equal to one another
nice false equivilancy. give me another

File: 1478645866173.gif (2MB, 360x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x360px

>>131342503
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihnkZOEe378&index=3&list=LLqm0Q-XmsHWX_Gklk-NAUAw

File: a.png (538KB, 859x768px) Image search: [Google]

538KB, 859x768px

>>131342503
I think I'm starting to get it. Please shoop into the picture the amount of warming that is due to human activity so I can really understand. Precision is helpful.

>>131342816
A particle of cyanide kills every cell it comes in contact with and they stay dead.

>>131342503

Because the atmosphere hasn't been replaced with greenhouse gases you fucking kike.

>>131342711
>>131342792

Why do republicans consistently jump to conclusions and use fallacies???

File: 1490451786602.jpg (46KB, 1146x1148px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 1146x1148px

>>131342904
this >>131342503
stfu you dumb baiting bitch boy.

>>131342792
They won't do that until the government forces everyone to do it.

Before the Industrial Revolution, CO2 levels were remarkably stable for millennia.
And yet global temperatures rose and fell, often dramatically.
So why is CO2 all of a sudden the master control level for global temperatures?

>>131342503

It isn't at all, and that's because hugely oversimplified

>>131343313
Answer my question. If human-caused global warming is real, what do you propose we, as a sovereign American nation, do to fix it?

File: drinking cyanide.png (140KB, 1029x241px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1029x241px

>>131342816
you eat more than that in one apple seed.

File: 1496770912493.jpg (44KB, 396x382px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 396x382px

>>131342503
only retard i see here is you
saged.

Because there are many, many factors, many of which point to the Earth's ecosphere having homeostatic qualities. E.g.: more CO2 means plants grow better, which means the Earth gets greener, which means makes the Earth cooler. This is already happening.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/04/25/inconvenient-study-co2-fertilization-greening-the-earth/

>>131342503
OP, don't worry so much about it. Mayors are enacting the accord without the president on the municipal level. A bipartisan of mayors got this.

All Trump ended up doing was making us look retarded.

>>131343877
It's almost like states should have the right to enter on their own accord without need for an overreaching federal govt...

>>131343649

Send shekels to Africa, goy.

>>131343649

Force everyone to buy Chinese rare earth metals to make solar panels.

>>131342503
2 things OP are wrong with the concept of co2 based global warming at this time

1) c14 rains down from the atmosphere. its used in radio carbon dating. its to heavy to stay in the atmosphere. all living things absorb it. its produced naturally via electrical activity in the upper atmosphere

2) the atmosphere is thinning and anything high up like say making a layer well above the jet stream will be stripped away little by little. this is lowering the tree line. something nasa tried to cover up with a fake excuse acid rain. the ph balance of the soil on mountain sides never changed it was the thinning of the atmosphere that killed the trees and it lowers a few feet every year. you can eyeball the amount of time humans have left on earth without radical changes in how cities are made (dome cities which cost to much for any one to take seriously)

File: smug_dog.jpg (25KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 640x480px

>>131343877
>It really is all about the virtue-signaling.

>>131343349

And no government will ever take the required steps to halt climate change, so it's up to them.

But, since all they care about is virtue signalling, they're as bad as the deniers.

I dunno, why are liberals so incapable of understanding basic math? Every single proposed legislation to "combat" climate change would have basically no discernible effect on CO2 emissions while costing any country that implements it billions of dollars.

Paris climate agreement has only 1 important point. $100 billion a year. That is why so many governments in the world go against Trump because they lose money.

>>131343313

>oy vey! You want a solution, goyim? Just give your (((government))) power

>>131342503

just turn the AC up you retarded libshit lol i mean how fucking hard is it to turn a dial lmfao

>>131342503
bait

>>131342503
So CO2 levels have never in the history of the world been higher than they are now? Is that what the picture is implying?

It's easy to understand, but science isn't an infographic. It's observation and experimentation.

File: gloworm.jpg (86KB, 892x780px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 892x780px

>>131342503
Delete this thread.

>>131343649
How can we debate solutions when a political party denies the problem?

>>131342503
Because climate change doesn't fall in line with their agenda to cuck the planet to (((big business))). So instead of admitting there's a problem, they'd rather just deny it.

File: image.png (4MB, 1292x8757px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1292x8757px

>>131342503
why os this picture so hard to understand for fedoratards?

There hasn't been a really devastating hurricane landfall in the US in over a decade now. Chances are that it is probably going to happen sometime in the next four years.

Are you people going to come right out and say that it is Trump's fault for withdrawing from the Paris agreement when it happens?

>>131342503
pic related is inaccurate.

The text on the right should say "Chink and Nigger Enhanced Greenhouse Effect".

File: monckton3.png.cf.png (153KB, 711x399px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 711x399px

>>131342503
This is your daily reminder, there has been no global warming in 20 years. That is all.

File: 1498371397569.png (2MB, 1891x4901px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1891x4901px

>>131342503

>>131342503
Great question.

Why did your daddy fuck you? Why did you love it, Le'monjello?

>>131342503

The greenhouse gas effect is very real but all attempts to come up with predicatively valid models to describe the MAGNITUDE of this effect have miserably failed. Atmospheric chemistry does affect energy retention in the biosphere, but this is evidently not the primary driver of global warming in the last century

File: Atmospheric_Transmission.png (75KB, 850x857px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 850x857px

>>131342503
Because it leaves out important parts of the explanation, like why CO2 traps outgoing radiation, but doesn't reflect incoming solar radiation (see pic related).

It's the scientific equivalent of creating a "How to Whistle" tutorial that's just you whistling instead of explaining the physical mechanism by which one whistles.

>>131342503

Climate change red pill.

The problem is refrigerants. Hydroflourocarbons have the largest impact on current global warming. In the process of "solving" the ozone hole, we outlawed CFCs. HFCs stepped in to replace them. Air conditioners are the primary cause of the greenhouse effect that now bakes the planet. There was no evidence the hole in the Ozone was new. The cure was worse than the disease. The only way to solve the problem is outlaw air conditioning. Since the people who sold us this pile of HFCs as a cure know that won't work, they blame methane and CO2 instead, ignoring the primary cause of the problem. Refrigerants. Google it. I'm right.

>>131343877

If mayors and governors want to waste their constituents taxes on a solar panel scheme in brazil, more power to them, but not mine.

File: climat change.jpg (222KB, 1524x667px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1524x667px

Climate change is real and it's happening.

>>131342503
>yes goyim pay more taxes for something you exhale thousands of times a day hehehe

>>131348158
this to me is the biggest red pill about global warming.

because across the board the only way to 'stop' global warming is liberal globalization

>Nature always finds an answer and its always devastating.

>>131348058
Holy shit. You are right.

>>131342816
400ppm of water is totally safe up to about a liter

based on my own body weight it would take half a gram to kill me

>>131347725
I want to see these liberal retards counter this

File: flatearth.webm (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

how is there global warming when the world isnt a globe

>>131348605
Compared to human "answers", nature is tame.

>>131342503
The retardation is strong in this thread. Is that what the right-wing really is, a bunch of mouth-breathers who cannot understand highschool science ?
>>131348043
Sweet graph bro

>>131348330
or nuclear winter

>>131349456
This

>>131349456
fly from New York to Tokyo and from Tokyo to New York in one direction for 2000 $ and ask yourself why you come out at the same place. Only works in a globe

>>131343877
Sorry we can't fix the roads this year, a village in Click Klack, Ghana needed more money to fight global war... I mean Climate change.

>>131350427
>he actually believes this

>>131345351
Is there an app to help me do it?

File: wuh.jpg (28KB, 444x287px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 444x287px

>>131343649
>sovereign American nation

>>131344076
>Force everyone
>Force

Brilliant idea! Why haven't we thought about using force sooner? Let's force people to stop being criminals! Let's force people to start farming while we are at it so we can end world hunger! Let's also force diseases away! Let's control everything and everyone on the planet to follow one group of people's strategy at making the world a better place by forcing them to when they don't comply!

If this doesn't work though we should try Plan B; informing people without patronizing them. But fuck it! Plan A is so much better!

Seriously, why are Americans so fucking stupid.

>>131342503
You forgot the Chemtrails

something like 70% of the earths ancient forests have been decimated, without proper co2 cycling the earth will heat. the ice caps will melt. with less glaciers, the blackness of arctic and norther sea waters will create an positive feedback loop and accelerate ocean heating. the seas will rise, trillions in property loss, the middle east will become uninhabitable and cause even more instability than is already there

also if we wanted to create jobs in america we could subsidize and have the government help these industries and have a green revolution. but nah we have fucking Rockerfeller 3.0 as Secretary of state.

also FLATTARDS USE THE FUCKING UN MAP AS THEIR WORLD MAP HAHAHAHAHAHA FUCKING RETARDS HAHAHAHAH

>>131350722
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucky_Lady_II

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgY8zNZ35uw

>>131342503
Why is your life so meaningless that you recycle this thread shill?

>>131342503
You should stop wasting power on shitposting so you can do your part in reducing greenhouse gases. Also never use cars again

>>131342503
Tell me why the polar ice caps on mars are melting. Is it all those cars being driven on mars?

>>131342503
>>131342596
If greenhouse gasses allow less heat to exit the atmosphere, it must also allow less heat to ENTER the atmosphere. This is basic thermodynamics, and logic.

Consider yourself eternally BTFO

>>131342503
this is gay

File: 1493098331739.jpg (55KB, 960x580px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 960x580px

>>131352644
>watch a "debunking" of flat earth that confirms your beliefs that you already had instead of flat earth content to be exposed to something that counters your worldview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RIBO7VB0VE

>>131353794
so by your logic i presume you came to the conclusion that the earth is flat by watching videos that claimed it was round?

also how does a lunar eclipse work if the earth is flat? and what are seasons all about? how does gravity work?

>>131342503
Cuz its all fake news, cuck.

>>131342503

because a liberal told them about it.

File: 1478823338821.png (185KB, 658x768px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 658x768px

>>131347102
Thats literally what they will do.
It goes like this:
>say every year there will be more hurricanes and they will get worse
>repeat this for 15 years
>it doesnt get worse
>er we meant it would make the weather more sporadic and hurricanes worse
>still normal
>Lets name winter storms to make them sound more intimidating!
>Freak out for days about every large storm and large snow fall
>blame climate change
YOU ARE HERE
>nothing happens still
>start naming everyday weather systems to increase fear
>EVENTUALLY a powerful hurricane directly hits the south causing a shitload of damage
>SEE WE FUCKING TOLD YOU CLIMATE CHANGE WAS MAKING IT WORSE. THIS IS DRUMPFS FAULT FOR TAKING US OUT OF THE PARIS CLIMATE DEAL
screencap this post because this is exactly what will happen(although if we get a big hurricane before they start naming normal storms, they will just jump to the end)

>big hurricane direct hits the south somewhere
>Katrina levels of flooding and destruction

>>131342503
Wouldn't the CO2 keep heat out as effectively as it keeps it in?

File: 1498099942277.jpg (38KB, 405x650px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 405x650px

>>131342503
Oh we understand. Mainly what we understand is that the ill organized mud people will be unable to handle the changes to the planet. We will though. Think of it like a second Flood to sweep the trash and degeneracy away.

>>131348043
>like why CO2 traps outgoing radiation, but doesn't reflect incoming solar radiation

Because of the angle at which the waves are entering and then trying to leave?
It's the same explanation as to why the sky is blue.
CO2 acts as a check valve for incoming heat.

because with all the extra Plant food in the air, the plants are not growing faster.... it just makes no sense... I mean at the end of the last ice age there were no cars or co2 to warm the planet.. go figure that...

>>131348096
shit bait bro

>>131342503
Because of this dipshit! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8

>>131346896
I just spent like half an hour reading about the shroud, fascinating shit anon.

File: 1488216030313.png (145KB, 720x452px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 720x452px

My temperature chart beats your theory infographic

>>131356320

Source?

we can mitigate climate change by growing hemp but stupid koch brothers dont wanna because they own georgia pacific

my favorite part is how Newsweek ran one issue in the 70s where the cover said something about global cooling from like one scientist and now every faggot republican in 2017 says "OMG!!! IT USED TO BE GLOBAL COOLING!!! WHAT HAPPENED"

>>131342503
Water vapor is not on your picture. You are a shillpost.

File: 02f.jpg (34KB, 655x527px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 655x527px

If global warming is kind of like having too much Ozone, what if we just bring back CFCs to counter its effects? Where can I apply for my Nobel prize?

>>131342503
what a terrible strawman, and an oversimplified argument.

>Learns about the basic concepts of greenhouse gases in 3rd grade
>uses it as an argument for man made climate change

Stating that there are more greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and putting the word "Human" in front of it is proof of nothing. But then again you are a person who plays in identity politics so I assume proof of anything other than what supports your side of the isles ideology just goes in one ear and out the other.

>>131342503
solar would bounce off at the same rate it gets trapped. fucking think for once moron.

>>131346252
desu I'm more worried about things getting colder than hotter. It's easier to shade crops and have them grow than to warm them and have them grow.

>>131342503

it would be easier to understand if the atmosphere thickness were drawn to scale to show how thin it really is. this image perpetuates the assumption that the atmosphere is an infinite resource. People cant really grasp how thin it is, or how much of it 9 billion people will be using on a daily basis, if they could, it would be easier to understand how human activity has a significant influence.

why don't we just weaken the ionosphere during a solar flare? where is my nobel prize.

>>131342981
earth might be devastated and turn into a venus after a certain tipping point

aka a poisonous planet which kills you immediately with it's atmospheric pressure

"And as such, you now see that humans have affected global climate. Now, lets tax American corporations, make them reduce production, and not worry about the rest of the world while they continue to do as they please, which will have an incredible economic impact on us'

>>131360942
I've seen people argue in these threads that the industrialization of India/China is ok because it's "their turn," and it wouldn't be fair to enforce the same standards on them even though the apparently world is going to end any year now.

>>131342503
MORE CARBON CREDITS AND TAXATION ON EVERYTHING WILL TOTALL FIX THIS

>>131354907
Light and carbon dioxide are two completely different types of things you bean

File: apocalypse.png (19KB, 902x498px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 902x498px

>>131361355

>dat reading comprehension

I'll try to explain myself with burgers so you understand.
The "heat rays" from the sun penetrate the atmosphere easier at a 90 degree angle and when they get reflected they try to go back through it at a different angle, which makes it harder for the rays to leave; they bounce around the place like a stone when you throw it at an angle into water.
CO2 makes it even harder for these rays to leave, but the rays can always penetrate it at a 90 degree angle.

This is also why Venus is way hotter than Mercury, it's got the same "greenhouse effect".

>>131342503
because the premise of this bullshit is literally
>COW FARTS

liberals want you to (1) stop driving cars and (2) stop eating meat

they are pouring billions into both efforts. OPs faggy illustration was no doubt drawn up by one of those faggy ecoterrorist who thinks cow farts = end of the world

t. Commiefornian

>>131342503
you have no answers besides self genocide. no alternatives. what should we do? give all of our money and belongings to some suit or some bureaucracy so they can squander it on a project that never had a chance to work, or worse, funnel that money into their associate's pockets?

no. fuck you.

>>131342503
Where's the part of the "info"graphic that shows the "greenhouse" gasses reflecting more solar radiation? As usual your "science" ignores the facts that don't support your agenda. Fuck off you regressive asshole. If you want to see a no-car, no-meat paradise, move your dumb-ass to africa.

>>131342503
Why is Enochian cosmology hard to understand you heretics ?

>>131364357
I'm down with capitalism and technological ingenuity coming up with a more feasible solution than rolling everything back. Like producing large blue-green algae farms through seeding, promotion of any carbon absorbing plant/algae would be more economically viable and have a feed back effect. the more wiggle room we get (rather than rollback), the more we could move into less carbon emitting technology.

Stifling growth through regulation to stop two hundredths of a degree will prevent us from getting passed our high carbon practices.

Plus we aren't the culprits of greenhouse pollution and the main culprits have no obligation while we have no recourse.

File: 1.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

I was hiking along once and saw this hole on the side of this hill.

File: 2.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>131364958
I crawled inside and it was some kind of ice cave. global warmers BTFO!!

>>131360786
Sounds good, Al gore.

File: IMG_0027.jpg (89KB, 550x496px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 550x496px

>>131342989
He read it on the internet, give him a break it's gotta be true, nothing in this magical highway of atoms lies!

>>131365029
SHOOT IT

>>131344201
O-o-o-kay... Do you need more tinfoil for your hat?

>>131347708
Well, if your definition of 'globe' excludes the oceans and seas of the planet, then maybe.

File: 3.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>131365067
I did.

>>131363220
Atmospheric co2 holds and refracts less heat than water vapour and /or dust particles. Also the sun plays a large part in heat, and we are going into a solar minimum. Do your heat calculations take into effect the energy expelled in just tidal forces? How about that in the Triassic period atmospheric co2 was 4 times the concentration? Why didn't those triceratops burn up? How could they grow that big in such a "hostil" environment.
>fuck off pleb

>>131342503
Religious Conservatives don't believe in global warming. The alt-light and alt-right don't give a fuck.

Global warming is real, but the effects of it are utterly insignificant. If the world temperature raises 1 degree in the next 100 years, it doesn't make a fucking difference - it's a distraction from the Left to get attention away from the ongoing WHITE GENOCIDE.

>>131342503
90% of the greenhouse affect is caused by water vapor.

>>131365430
>WHITE GENOCIDE
Speaking of hoaxes.

>>131347725
>>131349307

this is true cancer
take one of the major claims of this image macro: that CO2 is only "hypothesized" to have a climatological impact and in reality probably has none.

Take the first image of deep-sea benthic oxygen isotope ratios, which is a solid proxy for global temperatures.
Over that time (the last 66 million years), solar output changed only about 1 W/m2, which furthermore has the wrong sign since it increased, while temperatures were generally falling.
The albedo from changes in the position of continents is even smaller with >1 W/m2.

Meanwhile, CO2 concentration changed from 2000ppm (at the ECO) to 180ppm (at the LGM), which amounts to a change in radiative forcing of about 10 W/m2.
There is no way of making sense of this temperature evolution without taking greenhouse gases (mostly CO2) into account.
We KNOW the absolutely crucial role CO2 has played over that time. The

You people would know this if you would bother to actually read the scientific papers where these graphics come from, instead of relying on the personal conclusions of anonymous nobodies with no expertise.

>>131348043
> water vapor dominant greenhouse gas
If it gets hotter, then more water vapor, then more blockage, then more trapped heat, then more water vapor. How is this reverted? Some kind of ice deposit process at the poles enhanced due to very humid conditions? Just wondering

>>131342503
Why cant leftys distinguish between a scam and a plan that will actually do what it says?

>>131365691
Soooooo you copy and pasted a thesis, that something changed in this period we don't know what but it's the carbon.
And the sun stayed about the same so it's the carbon, yup the Carbon, the copy paste proves this.
>not the lack of carbon producing fauna after 2 or 3 global extinction events. Or the fact that 2 or 3 global extinction events occurred. You're still going with carbon eh?

>>131361291
Right, let's just do nothing. It is totally better amirite?

In case you're wondering, Carbon tax would force companies to watch out for emissions.

>>131366047
if you would just read what is actually written, I spelled out exactly what changed: the change in solar forcing is a) much too small an b) has the wrong sign.
CO2 was by far the most important forcing in the very graphic they use to claim that CO2 has no impact.
Furthermore, there were no global mass extinction events during the Cenozoic, let alone 2 or 3.

Lastly, if you're annoyed by copypasta, the people you should adress with that are the people I'm responding to. They're the ones who keep spamming the same misleading images over and over again while I type out everything on my own.

>>131366304
No it would make low income pay more, wealthy companies buy new windows siding and furnaces and get carbon credits in return for being nice green guys. They then sell these credits to public schools, low income housing because they aren't energy efficient to get out of paying extra taxes!
>Your a dumbass, probably from Quebec Ontario or BC, go back to the CBC

File: IMG_1039.png (131KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 640x1136px

>>131366506
>Over that time (the last 66 million years), solar output changed only about 1 W/m2, which furthermore has the wrong sign since it increased, while temperatures were generally falling

Pic related, why u lie

>>131354476
>THIS IS DRUMPFS FAULT
Yeah but by the time that happens it will be Barron they're talking about.

>>131366867
K-Pg is at the base of the Cenozoic, we are talking about the temperature DURING the Cenozoic.

But that's pretty much irrelevant anyway because your explanation is nonsense anyway

>>131342503
So does solar radiation go more easily through co2 in the other direction than another?

File: preindustrial.tempanomaly.png (29KB, 459x310px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 459x310px

>>131347708

>>131367062
So you can supposedly dicipher a masters university thesis you copy pasted, but you cannot figure out simple pictures with numbers. It's ok your obviously not cognitively developmentally adept enough to understand what I'm saying.
No worries. Don't vote or have kids.

File: Gwm1y.png (18KB, 600x374px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 600x374px

>>131342503
>All right wingers are climate deniers
No, only conservatards.
I'm a right winger, and I support nuclear power.
I'm also an engineer.

Besides, climate has NEVER stopped changing (we are no longer in an ice age, are we?)

Meanwhile, most leftwingers are evolution deniers
>We are all the same

Fucking hypocrites.
You are no better than the climate change deniers.

>>131367369
all you offered so far is a lot of whining about copy pasting texts (which isn't even true in this case) and a nonsensical explanation about mass extinctions. So why would I listen to you when you try to lecture me about cognitive development?

>>131342503
You should have stuck to ozone. At least that was believable.

>>131342503
Gawd would not allow for Global Warmin'!

>>131367554

>we are no longer in an ice age, are we?

No, we're still in an ice age. We're just in the interglacial period of an ice age, though.

>>131364711
greenhouse gases don't reflect solar radiation. That's why they're greenhouse gases in the first place

>>131367062
What was the avg CO2 (atmospheric) during the Triassic Jurassic period vs now? What's the estimated global temperature since the Triassic period? So did the dinosaurs burp to much is the scientific consensus now? That's why all the extinction? Not continental drift or asteroid impacts? So why the geologic scarification around the same time? What about the pole shift? I bet you say homo sapein is only 30,000 years old to.
I'm done with halfwits like you who are to scared to use your own flag while LARPing
>BTFO by a leaf.

>>131342503
So cows make up 62% of our carbon in the atmosphere. Do we do genocide on cows? Look, were already naturally heading towards healthy alternatives anyways, so stfu. Your side claims it won't be an issue until 100s of years into the future. Probably why you won't worry about Isis, because your air is warm.

File: Planet_X_1.jpg (94KB, 476x654px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 476x654px

>>131342503
Climate Change is not due to anything humans are doing. I can quickly prove this too.

Below are other planets in our solar system that are experiencing global warming.

Planets in Global Warming:

- Earth is experiencing global warming
- Pluto is undergoing global warming
- Mars Is Warming, NASA Scientists Report
- Global Warming on Jupiter
- Global Warming on Triton
- Global Warming on Neptune

Global Warming is a Space event!

---

The sole reason for these planets experiencing sudden heating, including Earth, is due to the inbound Planet X.

Peace out.

File: climate models vs real world, warming predictions.jpg (68KB, 555x456px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 555x456px

Globalists are using "climate change" to push communism and anti-US policies under the veil of environmentalism. Industry and households are moving to solar and wind voluntarily because it's economical and technology is improving. Zero government intervention is needed. Faulty prediction models are designed to cause panic and sell (((communism))) to idiots.

>>131368109
I think a lot of your confusion just comes from the fact that you don't know what the major sinks and sources are.
I'm telling you now: the biosphere is neither the most important source nor the most important sink. No climatologist thinks that climate on Earth was driven by how much animals were around at a given time and by how much they "burped" (that's why I told you that your explanation about extinctions is nonsense).

On the timescales we're talking about, Volcanic exhalation is the dominant source and the chemical weathering process of CaSiO3 is the dominant sink.

File: IMG_0993.jpg (141KB, 992x744px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 992x744px

>>131367573
You said no mass extinctions, in your copy past the only date is 66 million years ago until now, 66 million years ago was a mass extinction. Unless you missed a section of copy/paste, your fucking dumb. Better reread your own bullshit.
>Over that time (the last 66 million years), solar output changed only about 1 W/m2, which furthermore has the wrong sign since it increased, while temperatures were generally falling
Pic related again.

>>131368460
I know that, you don't have to keep pressing it. You have yet to establish how a singular event is supposed to have caused a complex temperature evolution over 66 million years

Daily reminder that if ypu dont care about the environment you dont deserve to be a part of western society.

File: 1300044776986.jpg (34KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x600px

>>131342503
>round earthcucks literally believe this

>>131368460
IF it was asteroid impact, combined with mass volcanic activities the atmosphere wouldn't clear for decades causing and increase in heat and CO2 is my point, this increase would cause more liquification of crust materials causing continental drift, depending on the size of asteroid or asteroids could cause continental displacement causing things as mammoths frozen still whilst eating.

The moral of the story is we've got no fucking clue what happened, but to blindly extrapolate from unknown variables is dangerous and fucking retardation of scientific method.

File: spiral_2017_large (1).gif (1MB, 1240x1318px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1240x1318px

Nothing about this is natural.

>>131342503
If greenhouse gases is what prevents solar radiation from escaping the atmosphere, why wouldnt those same greenhouse gases prevent radiation from getting into the atmosphere in the first place?

>>131368774
I'll give you this: *someone* here certainly doesn't have a clue what happened, that's for sure

>>131347725
One of you /pol/sters have the source(s) to the related documents?

File: unnat.webm (2MB, 1366x662px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1366x662px

>>131368843
Here's a broader picture.

>>131368891
Basic misunderstanding of the physics behind it all. The emission spectrum of the sun is mostly in the visible spectrum. Light in the visible spectrum is absorbed and reemitted to be released as heat. The emitted light has lower energy than the absorbed light, since some energy is lost in the process, so the emitted light is in the infrared spectrum.

CO2 and other greenhouse gasses have an absorption spectrum in the infrared range. This means the visible light coming from the sun passes right through these gasses when it's entering the earth, but the infrared light leaving the earth is absorbed.

File: IMG_0245.png (227KB, 372x357px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 372x357px

>>131368312
>The sole reason for these planets experiencing sudden heating, including Earth, is due to the inbound Planet X
But... I... what?

File: 1496723024079.jpg (147KB, 680x979px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 680x979px

>>131368670
That sounds good on principle, but caring about the environment is a loaded statement. Two people can care about the environment and have diametrically different courses of action based on different interpretations and beliefs as to which policies constitute a lesser of evils at scale.

>>131342503
The earth cools itself via volcanos you fucking retard learn a thing or 2 before you try to explain fuck all. And guess what we have another big one about to blow. Retards like you will be wiped off the map.

File: Planet_X.jpg (426KB, 1010x1291px) Image search: [Google]

426KB, 1010x1291px

>>131369245

File: icevol_2017.gif (873KB, 1242x1323px) Image search: [Google]

873KB, 1242x1323px

>>131368843
>>131369175
Here's a gif that shows just how rapidly the arctic sea ice is melting

>>131369304
Although sulfate aerosols have a cooling effect, it's not nearly enough to counter human GHG emissions.

>>131342503
>CO2

lel

if you believe in global warming you are fucking stupid.

end of story.

File: fig-nearterm_all_UPDATE_2017-panela-1.png (1MB, 2633x1350px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2633x1350px

Here's an updated visualization of the IPCC's climate models vs observations.

>>131367554

Unironically asking, what's your engineering trade? Was aspiring to some level of Engineering myself.

>>131369432
Are you to say that this stellar body is pulling our orbit into a shit show?

File: climate ice ages 415k year temp graph.jpg (63KB, 720x468px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 720x468px

>>131369666
>>131369677
Here's a larger perspective about where the world is really headed.

>>131370009
yep far more likely we are going into a new ice age than any catastrophic warming

man has nothing to do with it either, it's the sun

chemtrails aren't helping though

File: Marcott.png (55KB, 909x705px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 909x705px

>>131370009
like almost all misleading climate change meme pictures that are posted here, this is missing the instrumental record. There should be a sudden uptick at the very end of the graph, which goes above the entire Holocene range

Can't we just nuke the sun?

>>131342503
Not's not until I see proof to the contrary. In fact i'm riding on it as a back up solution if whites get killed off, to finish off the niggers and sub humans.

File: temps.png (348KB, 957x600px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 957x600px

>>131370009
This figure doesn't actually stop at "today". It likely ends somewhere in the 19th century as many of these misleading figures do.

Here's a more accurate picture. What's happening is unprecedented.

You can watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7aZ6vqCk2E for more info.

File: IMG_0199.jpg (163KB, 1485x1125px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1485x1125px

>>131370273
Perhaps we should covertly infiltrate reptilian people as well.

>>131342503
I think the hardest thing for me to understand is why it's intellectually and morally superior liberal cities that create the most pollution.

>>131370258
Nice. I was looking for this but had to scavenge through a youtube video lol

File: 2017eemian.png (57KB, 777x304px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 777x304px

>>131370439
this is the newest version I know (also given on the left, estimates of the Eemian temperature range, when sea level was 6 to 9m higher than today)

File: NYTimes2.jpg (562KB, 1747x1275px) Image search: [Google]

562KB, 1747x1275px

>>131369777
Indeed. There has been a long search for this disturbance of Neptune and Uranus being pulled outwards toward the constellation Orion.

At some point in our near future this planet will cause a polar shift of Earth. We're in the End Times right now.

File: IMG_2536.jpg (70KB, 640x625px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 640x625px

>>131370202
>chemtrails

>flag

>>131354476
I remember this
>Hurricanes are only going to get worse because of El Nino and SUPER NEW EL NINA!
>Hurricanes stopped coming for 8 years, until recently
>Back to regularly scheduled program

>>131342503
>dA jOos

ill just leave this here

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/31/mars-also-undergoing-climate-change-ice-age-retrea/

>>131342816

>he talks about calculated risks when his country is importing in thousands of shitskins

>>131368843
The temperature increase is coinciding with the earth's natural warming period after a little ice age.

There are planets in our solar system heating up (mars losing ice at its caps) and planets cooling down.

We are in an orbit (i forget what its called, its more like a tilt or variation) similar to that of mars to we tend to heat up and cool down at similar time.

To say MUH CO2 is a correlation is just as strong as the graphs here

get over it faggot, All we are saying is we dont know if humans are the main source.
>>131346252

now get off my board

>>131344924
>Every single proposed legislation to "combat" climate change would have basically no discernible effect on CO2 emissions while costing America billions of dollars.

FTFY.

File: 20170517_055504.png (135KB, 491x371px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 491x371px

>>131344076
>force

>>131371798
orbital modulations can't account for the current warming, because they operate on deca-centennial timescales, not a few decades

File: 1490606617720.jpg (36KB, 400x460px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 400x460px

>>131342503

>The entire planetary climate system is just the sun and greenhouse gasses
>Why are rightwingers so stupid

>>131342503
We get your concept. It's just that it only exists in hypothetical simulations, and is coupled with a bunch of lib bullshit.

It's just the Book of Revelation for liberals. Everything liberals want, (more muds in America to guarantee a demographic shift for the left, money for the third world and tax punishments for us, more low-result energy sources we can later be told are harmful too because it's about stopping whites from being resourceful than protecting the environment) all seems to work for this supposed endtime inevitability. But all the predictions of An Inconvenient Truth were wrong, and now Gore has to make a NEW movie to supplant and update the lie. It's almost like end-time prophets from any sect are working for ulterior motives and are just full of shit.

>>131373438
it's not hypothetical
the importance of greenhouse gases in driving the climate can be clearly observed when you take a look at the paleoclimate record

>>131342503
Wow, an artistic representation, my life has changed


Try again, nigger

>>131346896
Shit, now I know why they call people like you Christcucks

>>131350427
Agreed, somehow morons will do some mental gymanstic and say it is wrong

Then why is this picture so hard to understand for left wing retards?

File: LFTR-scheme-of-a-luiquid-fluoride-thorium-reactor.jpg (34KB, 499x318px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 499x318px

>>131373973

>>131373577
>it's not hypothetical because my analysis of records that coincide with a time that didn't have the same pressures is the same as now
You don't even understand what hypotheticals are anymore. And you didn't come with 'hey there's too much carbon in the atmosphere we need to take it out' you came with 'hey there's too much carbon in the air so white countries should make none, and also stop having babies and let brown people into your country. What's China?'

You're snake-oil salesman pushing demographic suicide under the guise of envriomental protection, selling volcano insurance to Rhode Island while Yellowstone is on fire.

Your science is probably right. Your responses however, are not what we're gonna do. The Northwest Passage opening encourages trade of western nations, and farmland is opening in the North. White nations have everything to gain with changes in temperature and all we have to lose is the brown hordes. Closing our borders, reshaping our politics will help us weather any storm, imagined or otherwise. Whether to protect against the forces of nature, or the forces of globalist kikes, we can survive any bullshit, if we don't listen to country-breaking scum like you.

File: file.png (179KB, 768x465px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 768x465px

>>131374004
they are scared by the nuclear symbol

oooh so scary. the cleanest and safest form of energy is soooooo scary cause like bombs or something

0.8 degrees kalvin in 100 years truly devastating things here...

>>131343649
Mass vasectomies.

>>131342503
The sun is the only major driver of the climate. Move along.

>>131374253
im concerned about our ability to handle it.
Did you see how helpless the japanese where when a fucking wave hit it?

>>131374117
I've never argued for a stop on having babies or that we should let the third world re-settle here and I don't think anything I said could be construed to mean that.

If you're interested, the solution I favor is CF&D. Not only would that be revenue-neutral and not increase the power of governments, the majority of the population wouldn't see a net increase in spending (because the increase of energy prices would be compensated by the dividend), if we were to implement that, we would probably even see a stimulation of the economy.
So yeah, I'm not particularly wrung by anything you said just there.

>>131342503
Last week's heatwave in England is proof of global warming.

File: thorium reactors.png (2MB, 938x4167px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 938x4167px

>>131374429
>old
>out of date
>poorly made

modern reactors are the safest in the world. stop falling for liberal propaganda

Thorium based reactors will be even safer and even more economical to run than traditional uranium plants

>>131374253
aside from corporate cost cutting, lies, and multiple meltdowns above a level 5. nuclear would only work under strict white national socialism.

>>131374712
meltdowns are a meme

only a few have happened in the entire history of nuclear power and that was because the plants were old or poorly made.

>>131353648
Are you retarded?

>>131342503

I don't have a problem with acknowledging there is a threat.

I have a problem with another global welfare program for some of our enemies while giving China a pass to pollute all they like while we restrict the US even more with leftist regulations on everything.

I would rather see all the gibs invested back into the US to provide marketable tech solutions around the world where both parties benefit. Capitalism not socialism.

https://www.tesla.com/solarroof

Technology and capitalism are the only forces strong enough to solve the problems that technology and capitalism have created.

Socialism and good intentions are easily wasted and corrupted at best and at worst, turned into a handicap for the US.

>>131342503
What percentage of climate change is caused by humans?

>>131375196
very likely more than 70%

>>131342503
Fun game: respond to climate change advocates with "if you don't support nuclear power you are not serious about climate change". Enjoy.

>>131368843
Actually that seems quite fucking natural to m