If we have the capacity to be happy without civilization, then it really isn't needed.
The only excuse any of you have for civilization and progress is "It gives my life a purpose and meaning".
Civilization is money in a ripped pocket; always needing more, always seeming too low. Then you get it, that large amount that sticks to your pocket; that big promotion or raise you were promised, that surgery you wanted, that dream house, the sexy wife. But then you get those things; you have to work twice as hard, that face lift is drooping, the dream house needs to be remortgaged and the housing market crashes, and your wife leaves you because you're never there for her. Then you move on, and you go for the next hit of civilization, trying to reach all these new dreams, an even better promotion, an even bigger house, and an even sexier wife, and a surgery that makes you look like Robert Pattinson. You reach for the stars, and you accumulate so much wealth, and then you invest it, and you make even more, then you invest more. Progress seems to be uplifting; but the illusion masks a dopamine-drained brain; you can't experience life anymore; food is ash in your mouth, sex is boring, there is no lukewarm or cool breeze; there is no comfort. You lose a million dollars on the stock market; no biggie, you still have 200,000$ left, which is a lot more than most people have. But you end it all, and jump from a building half as tall as your dreams; because any loss, at this point, is too much loss.
You ever wonder why giraffes, with their really long necks, never look up at the stars, or why a king of the jungle doesn't ever aspire to be an emperor of the jungle? They were raised with sewn pockets; never enslaved by civilization, thus never in need of progress.
Civilization , in my personal opinion, is a compromise.
They could be the same race, a different race, the same religion or a different religion; it doesn't matter.
The fact that you need laws and protection means that you don't trust your own "people".
When a mother feeds a child, it's not a trade; when a child is grateful to his father and gives generously, it's not a trade; these things don't require compromise. But when we see someone we don't trust, we expect them to benefit our side of the deal ALWAYS, otherwise there's no trade. Trade is another compromise. Then these socialists want to remove trade, but they force people to trust eachother, and they force people to get along, with their liberal agenda, but it's just as compromising as the capitalists, because they expect me to have feelings for a people I don't care about.
The American people, for example. is no people. it's a polity. They only exist as one, because it's the compromise of trade and security that binds themtogether, and the propaganda machines that create artificial bonds between them. Among them, their only people are their families or close friends; in rural areas, maybe there's more trust and love, but it's all still the same.
Then you white nationalists think there's a spiritual bond between all white people. it could be more than skin color; it could be genes. But it doesn't matter. You're pretending there to be a "White" group, but this white group only exists in the mind of the Western polity. It's a fabrication by pan-european entities that want to bastardize peoples. I've empathized with you, because I understand your hatred of compromise between races. But you live in compromise.
Nazi Germany would have become the greatest epicenter of European bastardization. We saw it; the honorary Aryan "Jews", "Blacks", "Arabs", "Japs".. Hitler created compromises to fulfill his agenda.. After a nazi victory, more compromises would come, and more, and more