Tulsi Gabbard is a CIA asset, controlled by the Council of Foreign Relations and the cult, Science of Identity run by (((Chris Butler))). Her father, ex-husband, current husband are all members of the cult. She will be pushed as an anti-war progressive candidate to win over millennials. In reality she will be pushing for more military intervention and promoting the ideology of her violent cult.
http://archive.is/SKofn
http://archive.is/TFu8I
http://archive.is/0hnFz
>>131286080
"Butler arranges the marriages of his devotees and that it is an honor for devotees to eat food (prasadam) prepared from the finger and toenail clippings of guru and also to drink the water used to bathe the feet of guru."
>>131286080
"Eduardo Tamayo, Tulsi’s husband or ex-husband, is said to be the son of a Filipino military guy, Col. Antonio Tamayo, Jr., who is said to be a devotee of Jagad Guru Butler....She’s saying very little about her own marriage. She was married for a number of years, but no photo of her husband, Eduardo Tamayo, has ever appeared in the press and she never appeared publicly with him"
What is she hiding?
>>131286080
this is obvious and was obvious 2 or 3 years ago.
i have a bet that she will be the 2020 dem nominee. 50 to 1, but unless someone comes from leftfield, there is no one else it could possibly be.
>>131286080
https://youtu.be/gPsqnQXLuu4
>>131288285
Had to have a second photogenic marriage, since the first wasn't something they're wanted to promote.
>>131288054
It isn't obvious to anyone in the states. They're falling for her act. She's constantly praised on the media for her meaningless legislation she promotes.
I suspect you're correct that nobody else would take the 2020 dem nom from her.
>>131289281
First cousin marriage problems in cults.
https://youtu.be/7E7d0uDgX1E
At least Gabbard would look better on paper than Mark fucking Zuckerberg.
Both would still get demolished by Trump anyway.
>>131290415
From my research, her first marriage may fall under immigration fraud.
Yeah but (((((((((((((((((((((((Richard Spencer))))))))))))))))))))))) supports her so it's a-okay, she's /ourgal/
>>131288054
I sort of think you're right.
She can't win in 2020, but would almost certainly win in 2024.
But the Dems, in their desperation to "do something" , will probably run her in 2020, ignoring the bigger picture and wasting her.
>>131292172
Let's hope they waste her potential. But it might be part of the pre-programming phase, getting people used to the idea of her being president. Then they could present her as a solution in 2024 that nobody could say no to.