Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Hypothetical scenario 2017-06-25 02:17:54 Post No. 131279123
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Hypothetical scenario 2017-06-25 02:17:54 Post No. 131279123
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Figure.png (351KB, 963x544px) Image search:
[Google]
351KB, 963x544px
Imagine that in ten years artificial wombs have been invented. They function like a normal womb, are easily affordable, and the children who come out have no health defects that they wouldn’t have had if they were grown naturally (ignore how likely or unlikely this is, it just exists).
Would women still have any role to play in society? With women no longer needed as baby makers and let’s face it, more a less useless as members of the workforce, would you still want them as members of the family unit?
When it comes to the raising of children, do you think that a motherly role is of serious importance? Would “motherless homes” be a problem the same way fatherless ones are now?
Tldr: would the secondary contributions of women be enough to keep them around if their primary contribution were no longer needed?
>>
I like the thought
>>
>>131279123
>will women play a role if in ten years artificial wombs get invented?
of course, they already murder their unborn children and we still fuck them
we will always need chicks for companionship.
>>
>>131279123
Like >>131280488 said, the sexual factor, even if reproduction is not the goal anymore, would still be an important part of society.
>>
It's still shitty to have 2 fathers OP no one will accept your faggotry, get over it.
>>
>>131280488
There will be sex robots to fuck and the better companionship you will have with dog or other men friends.
>>
>>131280631
>what are sex robots
Male companionship is so much better anyway. There are way higher chances that im able to talk to a male about astrophysics, philosophy, literature etc than I am with a w*man
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1