Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
Feminism is masculinism 2017-06-25 01:09:37 Post No. 131273931
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Feminism is masculinism 2017-06-25 01:09:37 Post No. 131273931
[Report] Image search: [Google]
What really astonish me is how feminism, while pretending to fight for women is actually defending masculine values, praising them as superior and trying to force women into adopting them.
See, all the value of a women reside in her pure appearance. Man always seek to prove he's something, he have to prove that he's strong, powerfull, rich, smart. He have to develop a proof of his value to have a position in the world, to be respected. In order to be " someone " he have to show something, wether it is his wealth or his intellect. Women don't need this, because they're already "someone" without having to do anything. In order to impress, to charm people, a women litteraly just have to be beautiful. Her value reside entirely in her natural condition. Feminity is the being by excellence, possessing its own value in its own being, manhood is a void, and the necessecity to fill that void by accomplishments in order to be someone. Hence why all the accomplishments through history came from man, from litterature to architecture, always the same need, always the necessecity for men to prove their worth. And the only reason they want to prove their value, is to impress womens, to charm them. In the natural state, women have the power. They always had through history. Because their value is intrinsic to their being, to the contrary of men who need to find it, to work to have a value, to finally fill that void that will allow them to charm women.
Now, modern feminism, who is shilled by fat ugly womens who don't possess a high intresic value and thus try to become like man, is trying to guilt women about their own condition. They try to insinuate that women shouldn't only " be beautiful " but develop " inner qualities ", have a career, produce intellectual works, like mens. What they don't understand is that the nature of manhood and the necessecity of producing such a worth was not the proof of man superiority, but rather the proof of their dependancy towards women.
>>
It is quite ironic how anti-feminine feminism is. It's all about making women more like men.
>>
that's why i call them women's rights activists, or WRAs for short.
>>
>>131273931
This is why feminism is redpilled, it teaches women to be strong. Each gender needs to be mentally masculine.
>>
>>131275919
No, you disgusting degenerate. The only thing you will create will be a dysfunctional society in which people don't know their natural role. Each society is based upon the natural order, the separation of tasks according to race, class, gender. Feminism is like communism, the ideal belief that you can destroy that natural order, that you can destroy the higher classes in order to have a perfect society, that you can transform man in women and vice versa. It's already mental transexualism. Each society that doesn't respect the natural order is doom to fail.
Needless to say, that in the natural order, women are stronger than man, since as I said they already own their own value and don't have to work to develop it.
>>
>>131273931
Like most leftist ideologies, feminism has a fundamental hypocrisy which it has never fully confronted. Should women be strong and ballsy or is that just being a "man with boobs"? Should women get special treatment or is holding the door open sexist? Is sexualisation empowering or is it demeaning?
As with Marxism, feminism cannot fully decide what it wants to be. Therefore, it just limps along in its cancerous state, demanding contradictory things whilst making everyone slowly more pissed off.
>>131275919
Except women don't because that isn't their inherent biological purpose. Women don't feel fulfilled when they're doing masculine roles, and there's a reason for this. I know women in their 50s and 60s who chose to have kids and have home lives and they're far, far happier than their childless "career-woman" equivalents who tend to be grumpy, humourless and resentful. Women don't do well at masculine roles either, so even if you discard the happiness of the woman it's still illogical to "make women more like men". That would work about as well as trying to turn men into women (ie. it would just make them depressed and useless).
>>
>>131277347
Well said.
>>
>>131273931
>he have to prove that he's strong, powerfull, rich, smart.
speak for yourself, vagina jew cuck'd cretin
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3