Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
science deniers conclusively BTFO'd 2017-06-25 12:17:58 Post No. 131270609
[Report] Image search: [Google]
science deniers conclusively BTFO'd 2017-06-25 12:17:58 Post No. 131270609
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: download.png (239KB, 499x340px) Image search:
[Google]
239KB, 499x340px
1) science deniers prefer to believe unverifiable, unfalsifiable myths rather than conclusions reached via focused observation on the world
2) this is because it seems we cannot trust conclusions drawn from our experiences, because what if our experiences don't reflect reality? What if the Devil is deceiving us?
3) therefore science deniers believe our experiences have no meaning
4) our experiences constitute our lives
5) therefore science deniers live meaningless lives
so is /pol/ really full of nihilistic faggots? do you really have no faith that God is compatible with science? because I can disprove that in an instant. just ask.
>>
Reverse this with religion?
Why don't you subscribe to religion using your same logic?
>>
>>131270609
no talk until you acknowledge the science of HBD. Sage
>>
>don't be a primate, bin that climate
>>
>>131270725
because I'd rather derive meaning from conclusions made about observation on the world rather than have """""meaning""""" be established by long-standing myths.
that's not to say God doesn't exist. I do believe God is compatible with science. Also, I respect religion as necessary for sustaining a society, as an institution for societal control and the like. But not as a means to nihilistically derail science.
>>
>>131270846
i expected nothing from this thread, yet your reply was the best thing on /pol/ all week
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1