What was the point of creating /bant/ when again 90% of threads on /pol/ aren't related to politics???
>>131222966
You can't just wave a magic wand and expect board culture to change, /pol/ has always been this way.
>>131223333
Digits confirm, nothing changes, it always stays the same.
>>131223333
I think they should've just doubled the max amount of threads here and officially prepare the boards user for thread-war of every facet possible. I honestly get pissed sometimes when mods ban some weird shitpost with 100s replies about running shoes or something, for the simple reason that it's the users that makes the discussion more fun and more insightful than some reddit, facebook, ign or whatever shit forum. You're bound to get very opinionated outcasts here, some very smart and pol is lost anyway so as long as obvious shill threads and porn gets removed, relevant topics get 200+ replies and there's some moderation to shitposts, I'm fine with it including some off topic shit to keep people from an hero.