Josip Broz Tito

>>131211401
based

>>131211401

Conflicted opinions.

Was a nationalist, didn't bow to the pressure of The Jew (In either the West or the USSR, but at the end of the day was still a marxist and somewhat of an egalitarian.

>>131211401
real piece of shit faggot who gave Albanians and muslims too much power

fuck him, hope he's enjoying hell

>>131211401
No medals fucking pathetic, figurehead for autism

>>131211401
Crypto-turk. The world would have been better if the monarchists had won

>>131211401

Looks like a thin Goering

File: pinochet.jpg (125KB, 723x721px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 723x721px

>>131211401
Basically made Yugoslavia stronk by cock teasing the Soviet Union and the USA, making them both give Yugoslavia a ton of money to fight for influence.

He still was a Marxist though

>>131211581
Didn't he also betray the Cossacks?

We don't learn much about him where I'm from (Brazil) but I did some research on him a few months ago and he seemed to me like a really competent guy (and pretty badass too, I mean, he actually told Stalin, after facing assassination atempts by russian spyes, "Stop sending people to kill me. We've already captured five of them, one of them with a bomb and another with a rifle (...) If you don't stop sending killers, I'll send one to Moscow, and I won't have to send a second."). He seems to have built a country with a reasonable amout of cohesion where no other leader ever managed to. No wonder it desintegrated after his death... I usually see him as a similar leader to Ataturk (Turkey) and Vargas (Brazil) both strong and capable leader who pushed for what seemed to be better for their countries.

Pro: Managed to instill pride in his people without being nationalist by creating a Jugoslavian identity to replace petty tribalistic ones like Serbs and Croats. Communist.

Bad: Didn't kill enough of Ustase and Cetniks. Didn't create and effective infrastructure of country to prevent downfall of Jugoslavia.