I have trouble being a national socialist because I believe in freedom too much. I'm way too inspired by Reagan and Kennedy's impassioned speeches about freedom and democracy and other shit to feel good about the inherently totalitarian fascism that national socialism includes
>>131201274
Nobody cares faggot
>>131201274
I understand why people want national socialism, but the truth is none of the people here who advocate for it have ever experienced a totalitarian government for themselves. If history is any indication chances are it wouldn't be the Utopian paradise they picture it to be.
>>131201274
Democracy, freedom and capitalism are fingers behind which hide the monsters of corporations and lobby
It's dumb to hear me rant about stuff, it's better and healthier for you to reach the truth yourself. I'll give you a start
>democracy implies all people to be politically equal
>companies are anyway unregulated and are able to use children or cheap labour to sell at a shameful profits products in the west, while gaining so much wealth to be able to buy huge chains of production and distribtution of basic needs (see: amazon)
Something here is rotten and wrong, and these men keep getting money while having us underdogs hypnotized with the dream of "free market" and "personal freedom" to justify and legittimate their criminal, self-centric business
Democracy is to corruptible and easily divided, just look at the USA benevolent dictator is the solution, we just need people willing to assasinate him if he gets out of line
ye that war on drugs thing was very succesfull and didn't spawn more crime
>>131201274
What's stopping you from absolute monarchy? People are free most of the time, just sometimes some parts get shafted by gov't. You can have dictatorship with freedom, you just have to make people agree with your reign. That is the hard part, though.