Why do Civ-Nats always punch right?

>>131182393
So I was on Periscope last night and someone I follow shared a broadcast with me. It haswith the tagline "Are black people crazy?". He obviously put that as bait. I go in and there's this stoner looking white guy from Nevada with the username "The_Shipped". Comments are being posted and sliding nonstop, but he still tries to answer what he can. 90% of the comments are Jamals and Shaniquas saying "you raciss, mane!", "weak whytes", "muh BBC" as well as a few Stacys, Pedros, and Changs virtue signalling by saying "you're pathetic/hateful", "I can't understand why someone would think like you", and of course the classic "It's the current year!".
He spouts a bunch of politically incorrect things like "90% of Egyptians are clit cutters. We don't need them in our country!", "Black people are 13% of the population but commit over 50% of violent crimes", "White privilege is a myth" etc. He also spouts some /pol/ memes like "We wuz kangz!" and "Stay woke!". I think to myself, "Wow, finally a non-degenerate on Periscope! He's getting chimped out on by these niggers, but he's still keeping his cool. Let me counter-signal to back him up". I say "Egypt for Egyptians, America for Americans, etc. if you want to cut clits, stay the fuck in Egypt." He reads my comment and responds "yes exactly! Anon has the right idea" as if I was the only sane one in the room. I spout more /pol/ memes and he asks "Anon, can we be friends?". I'm like "Sure man" whatever. I didn't want to seem cringey or gay, but at least I found another person who shares my views.

(1/2)

>>131182426
edit: it's three parts long

Later, someone else brings up ethnic nationalism. He's like "what's that?" and when explained to him, he responds "Why base nationalism on ethnicity? I want both sides to explain themselves". No one says anything for about a minute and he's like "See? You have no argument". I was on a tablet, so it was hard to type fast. I eventually respond and explain the difference between civic and ethnic nationalism in a straight forward, clear, polite, respectful manner. Things then go south really fast and unexpectedly.

>>131182648
He flies off the handle and says something like "Why do you types make everything about race? You're just as bad as the SJWs! What about black conservatives [who don't act like ghetto niggers] like Ben Carson? You would exclude him? That's unreasonable!" I explain "There are a few good black people, but they're not the majority. Besides, white nationalism is based on race, not character." He then goes full on "Culture is not based on race! Culture is more important than race."
I remind him "weren't you just talking about black people and crime?" He's like "So?". He clicks on my profile, sees my name which is Spanish (first and last) and says it aloud. "Anon??? You're not even white! You're a hypocrite!" I respond "My dad was Cuban and my mom is Irish-American. I look, act, identify as, and am treated like a white person (fair skin, blue eyes, brown hair, no obvious Asian, Arab, Amerindian, or Negro features). Depending on the definition, I may or may not be considered White, but even if I wasn't white, I could still support white nationalism." He then says "What about Rachel Dolezal? Does identifying as black make her black too?"
I was going to explain how it's not the same thing, being that I do not intend to deceive anyone and I do not deny or hide my half-Cuban heritage. Before I could say that, My chat was limited so I couldn't respond. He goes on for a minute more, then I refresh the chat and find out I'm blocked. After being blocked, I google his username and some user with Thor in his name has a tagline that says "The Shipped is a liberal snowflake." I think, is this a clever ruse?

>>131182393
I'm a democrat and civic nationalists worse than the lolbertarians

>>131182906

It's like, being a racialist already makes you despicable to leftists, why attack the few people still agreeing with you? It's like being a male feminist. Not only do feminist women hate you, but non-feminist men do too.

anybody? tl;dr?

>>131182393
>>131182426
>>131182648
>>131182691
I mean it's just some random fag on a chatroom or whatever periscope is

>>131186825
>I mean it's just some random fag on a chatroom or whatever periscope is
ok true but what pisses me off is Civ-Nats are just like that everywhere else. They are a cancer to our movement.I just want to know why they attack us more than the leftists they supposedly oppose.