>2017 >Still believing Russia hacked the election

>>131180099
Only dishonest people believe that
If you really want to be honest you will acknowledge that they hacked the dnc to make the election fair by exposing the left for being liars and cheaters

Even Drumpf admitted it.

>>131180099
>2017
>still talking about the election

>>131180184
>If you really want to be honest you will acknowledge that they hacked the dnc

>denied FBI or DHS the ability to investigate servers
>destroyed evidence by hiring Crowdstrike
>entire investigation based on hearsay

sorry. its all bullshit. case closed

Why would any honest person parrot CIA talking points?

>>131180312
Drumpf is an idiot

File: Bernie Sanders Bank Fraud.png (153KB, 640x573px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 640x573px

>>131180099

>>131168916
B-but Trump is the criminal guys.

>>131180099
I don't think anyone actually believes it, they just think saying it hurts drumpf

File: 1498193594459.jpg (52KB, 512x711px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 512x711px

>>131180418
well thats new

File: 1277449530753.png (55KB, 1185x1137px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1185x1137px

>>131180099
>all the american intelligence agencies are wrong!!!
El loco Redditto

File: please to post proofs now.jpg (39KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 512x512px

ITT: you post proofs of Russia hacking US election

You're all still nigger faggots MAGA

>>131180622
>all the american intelligence agencies aren't famous for lying and breaking the law

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LKzAsIMUx8

pay debts

>>131180719
kek

>>131180184
> Seth Rich worked for the Russians
Laying the groundwork for the next washingtonpost/CNN fake narrative?

>>131180815
So 17 intelligence agencies all simultaneously decided to lie about Russia hacking the election for some weird reason. Do you have any evidence for this or...?

File: 432423432432.png (737KB, 944x1008px) Image search: [Google]

737KB, 944x1008px

>>131180867
speaking of WaPo

their owner Steve Bezos, is also CEO of Amazon which just made $600 million off CIA contracts.

Should change their name to CIA News

File: 1495431137021.png (422KB, 477x447px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 477x447px

>>131180099
based Julian shitting all over the """democratic""" party

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1spvqcj
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1spvqcj
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1spvqcj
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1spvqcj
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1spvqcj

File: the redpill.jpg (25KB, 494x311px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 494x311px

>>131181035
Spies lie.

>>131180384
>denied FBI or DHS the ability to investigate servers

Wondering if this was before or after the Awan brothers swiped all they wanted to, from the dems?

/pol/, why don't this get more attention?
They stole computers, servers, were storing DHS & War on Terror intel on their cloud server, had wassmerman's & others' passwords. The dems "shared" these IT guys, along with their wives & a friend of theirs.

At least one fled home to Pakistan. WHERE are the Awan brothers? They're not Russian. They're Pakistani.

File: undeniable proof.png (727KB, 700x811px) Image search: [Google]

727KB, 700x811px

>>131180719

File: Russian Hack CoE.png (669KB, 2880x1502px) Image search: [Google]

669KB, 2880x1502px

>>131181035
>So 17 intelligence agencies all simultaneously decided to lie about Russia hacking

Yep

> for some weird reason.

No. A practical reason. Smear leakers as Russian agents, shakedown congress for funding for imaginary boogeymen, and reauthorized warrant less data collection.

>proofs?

My proof is they have 50 years of being caught doing everything from perjury, to murder to drug running.

My proof is they have no proof of what they claim while having a pretty strong motive to bullshit.

Here look at their chain of evidence.

>bs report, backing bs report backing bs report

>>131180099
Bump

>>131181368
dont know

File: proof.jpg (134KB, 634x677px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 634x677px

>>131180719

File: 85211374.jpg (101KB, 500x749px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 500x749px

>>131181470
>>131181035
so in summary my cash-strapped friend

The opinion of the CIA is based on

>a $1 bil NSA guessing machine
>pee-pee stories in a fake dossier
>an IT blog

real open and shut case there lol

File: In-the-age-of-information.jpg (33KB, 500x303px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x303px

>>131180099
When Snowden dropped, all the talking heads rationalized the unconstitutional surveillance and loss of freedom and privacy of the American People as something that was Necessary to keep them secure.

Ask anybody who thinks Russia decided the outcome of the US election, through the internet, if that means that technocrats and politicians took away their freedom, without their consent or even consulting them, for no damn reason whatsoever, and what Obama's line about "you can't have 100% privacy and 100% security" really means when the people behind Obama TOOK AWAY your privacy, and now, by their own claims, FAILED to provide you with the security they told you your privacy was worth sacrificing for.
Ask them if people like that deserve to be trusted when they try to tell you the next thing they want you to believe.

>>131181470
> Le 17 agencies meme
whew lad... that's an old one

>>131182037
no kidding

>>131181470
> they have 50 years of being caught doing everything from perjury, to murder to drug running
That's the CIA.
>My proof is they have no proof of what they claim while having a pretty strong motive to bullshit.
This is false. Do you think every intelligence agency would unilaterally agree on Russia hacking the election if there wasn't any evidence? Even Putin has said "patriotic" russian hackers may have been involved but the concept is just too extreme for you for some weird reason. Do you think Russia is your le best ally or something?

>>131181035
You're right, we should invade Iraq

Funny how it is the left who has taken control of the internet more than anything.

Twatter literally suppressing anything that wasn't pro-clinton; Facistbook being facistbook; Every message forum overtaken by Soros-funded shills & bots;
Then there's the entirety of msm (save OANN) being 110% controlled & scripted.

IF Russia "influenced" anything, it was obviously for the left. Last I heard, though, they hate Soros.

>>131182400
kek

>>131180099
I still don't know what that even means.

>>131182264
>Believes anything the CIA say

your literally a retard.

bet them WMDs are in Iraq too

anyone who says we take anything spies say at their word has no credibility at all.

>>131182551
>the left is winning
If this is losing I never want to win again

>>131182551

Not to mention-- we also have manipulated search engines, too! It's endless...

Boy, Russia must really love the left! sic

>>131180312
>>131180415
He admitted to the ATTEMPT of Russia trying to hack.

Russia ns try to hack US departments daily, so does China, N Korea etc etc...it does not mean they succeeded.

Jeh Johnson, Obama's DHS admitted that Russia had no effect on the outcome of the election.

>>131182821
Exactly this. What does it literally mean?

Did they get access to voting machines and added votes..or did they manage to block some part of votes...or what the fuck?

>>131183376
>He admitted to the ATTEMPT of Russia trying to hack.

after the listening to the CIA lie to him

>it does not mean they succeeded.

Russia didnt hack the DNC

Zero proof

no case thats a fact

>people with russian IP hacked stuff

Well you only have something there if the CIA claim that everybody in Russia works for Putin is true

...which it is not

also, the CIA can fake IP addresses that was in the wikileaks. so more proof of BS

Hacked doesn't mean they changed the outcome. This is what the media doesn't want you to realize.

>>131183376
>He admitted to the ATTEMPT of Russia trying to hack.

No, he's just fricking with them, like he always does, again. He's using *their* own statement in calling out obozo.

>I-It was her turn!

>>131182973
1) This isn't just the CIA it's every single american intelligence agency, you don't seem to get that
2) The CIA isn't responsible for Bush being war hungry. If you actually read CIA's report on WMDs which is now declassified you'd know that CIA never claimed Iraq was producing biological weapons.
>Iraq "probably has renovated a [vaccine] production plant" to manufacture biological weapons "but we are unable to determine whether [biological weapons] agent research has resumed."
Iraq was Bush's fault, sorry

File: Russian hacks.jpg (107KB, 877x620px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 877x620px

>>131180719

I don't get it either. The whole "Russian connection" things is basically private dealings that Trump and other Republicans had before the election, and those private dealings were business related. Turned out Democrats also had business related meetings with Russians.

The Deep State agencies keep confirming that nothing was hacked, yet the Dems and mainstream media keep stretching the truth to make it sound like something went down.

"Russiagate" is the Democratic Party's version of birtherism.

Which reminds me that birtherism, like Russiagate, originated with pro-Hillary Democrats.

I can't believe a stupid jewish dnc charade has gone on this long and actually still has fuel added to it's fire, there has been ZERO evidence of any collusion yet the media clings to it like it's last dying breath.

>>131180099
Bump

File: 1440821291543.jpg (141KB, 562x327px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 562x327px

>>131180099

People whining about Russia "trying" to hack election results

Not a word about the incompetent Hispanic woman that Obama put in charge of the OPC that was ACTUALLY hacked, allowing China/Russia access to up to 4 million people's info that hold security clearances

fucking idiots

>>131183529

Notice how the DHS hacking of Georgia, KY, WV and other states' voting systems issue magically disappeared -- despite DHS ADMITTING it? (Blamed a trainee's Microsoft gliche during a conference call).

Wish all these "Russia" threads could be saged, replaced by "hacking" with actual evidence -- AWAN brothers, obozo's DHS would be good starts.

File: dhsdisclaimer2.jpg (65KB, 968x189px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 968x189px

>>131183796
>every single american intelligence agency, you don't seem to get that

>17 agencies looked at the same exact BS assessment and agreed they like funding and power

yea. they are liars. plain and simple. you dont seem to get that. the DSA, CIA, NSA whoever the fuck all agree on lying to get funding and silence leakers.
> If you actually read CIA's report on WMDs

lies

just like the yellow cake

once again you point to the CIA as a credible authority

they have zero credibility.

thats why there assesments come with zero evidence

ooohhh and look at their fucking disclaimer.

even the DHS thinks they are full of shit

>>131183878
>originated with pro-Hillary Democrats.

they started smearing Trump with Russia in 2016 right after it came out that Hillary Clinton cut a uranium deal with Russia after Bill was taking bribes.

Have to wonder about songbird mcstain's influence in this russia fiction.

These pranksters are legit, same guys who successfully pranked crazy maxine and many other high-profile people around the world:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eqrw2vIvBv0

>>131180099
Bump

File: 1482009945518.png (123KB, 1308x844px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1308x844px

>muh russians

>>131181035
I trust the CIA and the NSA as far as I can throw them, but when it comes to the US Coast Guard I unquestioningly believe everything they have to say about cyber security.

>>131184630
>yea. they are liars. plain and simple. you dont seem to get that. the DSA, CIA, NSA whoever the fuck all agree on lying to get funding and silence leakers.
You're making unsubstantiated claim after unsubstantiated claim without actually providing any proof. With all those leaks happening don't you find it weird that there's nothing to back up your claim with?
>>131187689
So the US Coast Guard doesn't have tech experts? Do you think they're like sailors or something because of the name?

>>131183796
>never claimed Iraq was producing biological weapons
nice strawman. the argument was always that he merely had the weapons, not that he was producing them.
>le 17 agencies all agree
pretty low energy, desu

>>131189855
Ok and if you read the statement you would see the CIA never said Iraq has biological weapons, it said "Iraq probably has renovated a [vaccine] production plant to manufacture biological weapons". Is that the same as all 17 agencies saying Russia has definitely colluded in the american elections?
>pretty low energy, desu
Nice argument

>>131181787
Who is this cock crusaider