BBC Gives Platform To Pedophile Who Calls It A ‘Sexual Orientation’
>Nearly two years after the far left publicationSalonended its crusade to normalize pedophilia, the BBC picked up the slack, posting a piece suggesting pedophiles just need “help” not “condemnation.”
>The BBC is no stranger when it comes to controversy related to pedophilia. The British news outlet once employed popular TV personality Jimmy Savile, believed to have abused over 500 boys and girls. Savile’s decades of depravity were concealed behind a thick veneer of BBC celebrity and personal philanthropy, making the publication of such a provocative topic even more obtuse.
>The anonymous author, in his very first sentence, anxiously declares that pedophilia is just a “disorder” and likens it to an actual “sexual orientation.” The tenor and tone of the article is one of a victimhood — fear that if he were “outed” as pedophile, it may lead to “violence” and “physical attacks.”
>It should be noted that the author never hints that acting on the impulse to sexually abuse children is acceptable, and acknowledges that his “former orientation” later led him to seek help, discovering that it is entirely curable. Hedoes not, it appears, understand his own tacit admission: that the condemnation of nefarious and evil sex acts perpetrated on children, rather than social acceptance or acknowledgement of it as a sexual orientation,wasthe impetus for him to seek help.
>Not only did he not understand it, the author bizarrely concludes that the “demonization” of “this sexual orientation” makes it difficult for young people to seek help. Nowhere is it considered that lowering the severe social costs of the depraved impulses of a pedophiliac, could lead to an uptick in pedophiles acting on them.
>This follows a troubling pattern in far left news publications. In September of 2015, Salon posted a piece referring to pedophilia as a “sexual identity.” The Salon piece also featured a video with the author, Todd Nickerson, from virtuous pedophiles(yes, you read that correctly) in which he also referred to pedophilia as a sexual orientation. Salon pulled the articles in February, after a video of right-wing commentator Milo Yiannopouloswas released showing him defending relationships between young boys and grown men.
>The author’s theme that pedophilia should not be demonized in order to encourage pedophiles to seek help, precludes the more sensible and rational response that neither are mutually exclusive, and encouraging pedophiles to seek help is the corollary of its condemnation and degree of its perceived moral repugnancy.
>>131179162
>literally hid Savile and friends for decades
The BBC is full of fags and Jews. This should surprise nobody.
>>131179162
Bump
>>131179162
Link or it didn't happen
refuting something by mentioning the slippery slope fallacy should be a fallacy in itself desu senpai
Surprised even anybody out there takes the BBC even a tiny bit seriously, they're a joke always heve been always will
Did you even read the Salon article? There was literally nothing wrong with it. The dude even helped create and shill an organization to get pedos to not act out their desires.
He was molested as a kid but doesn't blame his perversion on that or hate the guy that touched his peeper.
Everyone who hasn't been molested says it's the worst thing in the world literally worse than death. It's pure virtue signaling. Having pedophiles out in the open and treating it like a mental health issue keeps pedos from committing crimes.
>>131181355
>keeps the pedos from committing crime
Literally no evidence to support this claim. How many pedos are there out in the world, anon?
>>131181225
No it shouldn't.
The slippery slope fallacy is usually logically right to assume that you are wrong if you say that if we allow X then Y is surely going to happen and then Z, W, U etc.
Because you can't know for sure through deductive thinking and you probably don't know the future either.
You can fix this by simply saying "It's very likely that if we allow X then these other things are going to follow"
>>131179162
Why don't you guys all bash the Conservative Party for sided with BBC (public TV station) supporting pedophilia?
Shame the BBC into oblivion by assuming and making it known that it is the Conservative Party which is behind it.
The Conservatives will freak and smash the commies at BBC.
Britain will become better of, and Brexit will be a success.
>>131179162
>>131179228
Which is worse: a child getting raped, or a pedophile being killed?
>>131179162
Bump
>>131179162
The BBC is literally a paedophile ring
That's why they promote immigration and all their comedians shill for it, because they get access to the rape dungeons in return
Alright guys
The time has come
Marry young Have many sons
Sell your daughters
Have all the fun
This is how the patriarch won