/pol/ I have a quick request. Can one of you post the pastebin link to that article that proves the US dropping nuclear weapons in WWII was unnecessary to end the war? I can't find it anywhere but I've seen it on here. Will redpill until it's posted or I'm kicked out
>>131179075
Of course it wasn't necessary to drop the bombs. Japan was going to lose the war no matter what they did at that point.
Saying "we didn't NEED to nuke them to end the war" is ridiculous, like something a toddler would say. It's such an obvious statement of fact that it makes you sound stupid to say it.
It's about HOW they ended the war. The fact is, dropping the bombs saved us from having to actually invade the home islands, which was good for both us and the Japanese.
But go ahead and drown yourself in your white guilt tears if you want. Japan doesn't need your pity, it's actually doing just fine.
>>131179325
Yeah this is an uneducated post because it assumes knowledge you couldn't possibly have. This article was very detailed and explained that the nukes didn't even prompt Japan to surrender. It states that Japan surrendered immediately after the soviet invasion, as they viewed that threat as much greater than America's bombs. I would like to have this article to share with some friends who are skeptical of the details.
But please, do go on and purport superiority on an anonymous forum!
Japs were fucking savages. They deserved more than two nukes:
http://www.unit731.org/Experiments.html
Look up "Operation Cherry Blossoms"
>>131179075
>WWII NUKES UNJUSTIFIED
>hey, so we got this new super-tech that's also a weapon, but we're still unsure of it's potentcy
>we wrecked some mock-ups, but it's not the same ya know
>well shit we've got islands of brown dumbfucks who've been begging- I mean refusing to surrender and we own their airspace
>so....