Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Would you consider voting for someone with this platform? 2017-06-24 03:59:40 Post No. 131174281
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Would you consider voting for someone with this platform? 2017-06-24 03:59:40 Post No. 131174281
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Would you consider voting for someone with this platform?
Anonymous
2017-06-24 03:59:40
Post No. 131174281
[Report]
ECONOMIC POLICY:
>End the Federal Reserve system.
>Raise the minimum wage for full-time work and tie it to inflation. End poverty wages for those working at least 40 hours a week.
>Call for universal healthcare and end the tyranny of private insurance companies.
>Provide a generous welfare system for the poor, covering basic necessities.
>Implement a simple, flat income tax for all wealth brackets.
>Cut government departments and organizations massively if they do not directly benefit Americans.
>Implement protectionist trade policies that are pro-American. No more NAFTA/TPP-style regulations.
DOMESTIC POLICY:
>End affirmative action.
>Private businesses can discriminate for any reason they want (don't have to bake the cake).
>Strongly pro-gun. Background checks at the most.
>Decriminalize drug usage and end the War on Drugs.
>Against NSA Spying/mass surveilance policies like the Patriot Act and NDAA.
>Pardon and honor Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, and other whistleblowers.
>Keep net neutrality.
SOCIAL POLICY:
>Keep abortion legal, but make contraceptives like birth control more accessible to lower the number of abortions.
>Let LGBT people marry, or at least get the government out of it. Churches can be allowed to deny a gay couple from marriage if they wish.
>Remove the death penalty. Too many innocent executed.
>Repeal hate speech laws and preach free speech.
>Businesses shouldn't be required to "diversify" employees or make quotas.
>3rd wave feminism/SJW-ism is toxic to society.
FOREIGN POLICY:
>Bring troops home from across the world.
>Massively lower the need for military spending.
>End all aggressive wars and defend our borders.
Overall, what would your opinion be about a political candidate who has these views?
>>
>>131174281
No stop brown immigration then maby
>>
>>131174281
No, I wouldn't vote for this platform
Economically it is too much of a fucking disaster
If I didnt need to worry about niggers I would strongly consider this against other parties, but niggers seriously ruin everything
>>
>>131174281
If the economics wasn't so socialist, I would vote in a heartbeat.
Fed needs to go, no universal healthcare, no welfare system, at least not like it is now, promote charities instead, everything else fine.
>>
So you want to implement massive government programs such as univeraal healthcare, while simultaneously removing our ability to create debt to finance the government, through the federal reserve??
That literally makes no sense, ending the fed would result in massive currency valuation collapses, you would need to immediately implement government spending austerity
>>
>>131174501
Tried to cover that at the very end with "defend our borders".
>>
>>131174501
>>131174528
Also this, needs to be pro white. Preferably pro white ethno state
>>
>>131174622
Different stages of the solution. Ending the Fed would come immediately. Social welfare promotion would come later after stabilization.
>>
>>131174281
Parts of the economic policies are good. Parts are worse than bad.
>End death penalty
And there it goes. If I could somehow overlook the already "do not pass Go" portions of the Economics sections, that right there is a deal breaker all on its own.
>>
>>131175062
I take it that you think there'd be too much money wasted keeping certain people alive and fed in prison?
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1