>The king who is situated close to the enemy, but separated from the conqueror only by the enemy, is termed friend of the conqueror.
When are Christians going to admit that albeit political disagreement there are also major ontological agreement with Islam?
Political ideals are almost always situationally shaped, whereas ontology is not; the former being materially based, and the latter isn't. Which one is more relevant to so-called Christians on /pol/? Sand-niggers are more relatable to the overall Christian groundwork than all of the intellectual degeneracy of the west such as communism, critical theory, scientism, and so on.
Why not using Muslims for cleansing purposes?