[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

What would you have done in this situation?

This is a red board which means that it's strictly for adults (Not Safe For Work content only). If you see any illegal content, please report it.

Thread replies: 170
Thread images: 29

File: 23508601.jpg (219KB, 1197x767px) Image search: [Google]
23508601.jpg
219KB, 1197x767px
What would you have done in this situation?
>>
>>131116058
I would have shot the woman.
>>
Slapped the fuck out of that woman for hiding behind her child.
>>
Did this skank really hide behind her kid?
>>
Beat him with his own air rifle.
>>
>>131116058
>hiding behind your child
Women everybody.
Shameless.
>>
We notice the pattern, you guys.
>>
>>131116058
As the dude with the gun?

I probably would have spat at her desu
>>
>>131116058
thats pretty fucked up. im pretty sure she wont even get a halmark card on mothers day ever again
>>
>hiding behind kid

Man when they say when it comes down to it people will always shoe their true colors
>>
File: 7858768758765876.jpg (11KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
7858768758765876.jpg
11KB, 480x360px
>>131116058
sodomize the woman with the gun and force her child to watch then unload it into her uterus.
>>
>>131116058
get out of Toronto!
Immediately
>>
>>131116242
yep

>http://www.cp24.com/news/group-of-thugs-responsible-for-10-armed-robberies-in-etobicoke-area-earl-1.3471065
>>
Hide behind the little shit, I can always make more , he cant dupport his siblings.
>>
File: IMG_2294.jpg (101KB, 970x813px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2294.jpg
101KB, 970x813px
>>131116058
The kid is barely a human yet anyway. He hasn't developed a personality like that woman. Plus, she looks like she may be an immigrant/refugee who has suffered many years of systematic racism/oppressions so its pretty hilarious that a bunch of white 4channers would have the gall to pretend their priviledged asses wouldn't hide behind a child
>>
>>131116058
told the child to get out so i could shoot the mother for hiding behind him

i can't properly describe how appalled i am
>>
>>131116058
why would anyone risk their life and years in prison for a few bucks? i don't get this. rob a fucking yacht club ffs.
>>
One chicken parma italian herb bread please
>>
>>131116557
Always the Canadians.
>>
>>131116457
>These lever action losers need to be apprehended before they actually shoot somebody's eye out
>This BB gun "red rider" is known to break skin

Are you fucking serious Canada?
>>
File: What'sWrongWithYou.gif (650KB, 446x251px) Image search: [Google]
What'sWrongWithYou.gif
650KB, 446x251px
>>131116409
>>
DESU any 4channer that is surprised by this is a virgin neet. It isnt the womans job to protect the child it is the mans. Why wasnt the father and prtector of the family present? Sort yourselves out.
>>
>>131116909
Working you fucking welfare reliant leaf
>>
File: 1477270068274.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
1477270068274.jpg
1MB, 3840x2160px
>>131116909
Your mother must have been a real piece of shit anon.
>>
>>131116058
Def order the $5 spicy italian. Shit is fire.
>>
>>131116909
Busy working 25/8 to feed and keep both bitches
>>
File: eg.jpg (129KB, 1098x867px) Image search: [Google]
eg.jpg
129KB, 1098x867px
>>131116058

I would have done the same of course. Everyone saying otherwise is not only retarded but also bluepill as fuck.

First of all that kid doesn't have a clue what's going on he thinks it's just a game and will die happy with no worries.

Second, it has been proven that our brains don't fully form until we're on our 20s so if you're pro-choice you can't have a reasonable argument why it's not ok to sacrifice something less than human in order to save a human.

Third, if the kid dies the parent can go on with her life but if the parent dies the kid will be a burden on the taxpayers which isn't fair.

Fourth, the mother can always just make another kid later or whatever and it will take less time for the kid to reach the same level of development as this one than for this kid to become an actual human being

Waiting for an argument that isn't just "muh feelz". Protip: there isn't one. If you're pro choice then don't even fucking bother.
>>
>>131116058
>woman using child as a shield
i expect no less
>>
>>131117397
I have kids. I would die for them 1000 times over. You have no clue.
>>
>>131116058

>rifle

nani?
>>
>>131116909
>Sort yourselves out.
ofc delusion cuck leafs like him.
>>
>>131117397
I hope for your sake you are Asian
>>
File: 1443736936033.png (74KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
1443736936033.png
74KB, 1024x1024px
>>131117397
>>
>>131117397
But it is a white child anon, you should really try pooing in a loo sometime.
>>
>>131116058

Wow, a picture of a nigger aiming a rifle at a kid, and he isn't the worst one in the picture.
>>
>>131117397
If you don't have the protective instinct to protect your own child, you are either defective or an r-selection strategist that shits out garbage or in other words a soulless nigger. You shouldn't be breeding in the first place, so sure, sacrifice your kid, because that kid will just be as soulless as you. Just make sure to get killed as well so we don't have to deal with your nigger-chink ass.
>>
>>131117507
>muh feelz
>>131117608
>muh feelz
>>131117716
>muh feelz
>>131117747
>muh feelz

I am not sorry for being a rational person and making the rational choice.
>>
>>131116058
I dont carry so hide sadly, if I was the robber I would have carefully shot the woman on the kneee or something for being a bitch
>>
>>131116058
Absorb the bullets with my 547lb body knowing the bullets would be stopped by my onion like and smelling layers of body fat. The gunman would empty his clips and be both disgusted and horrified as fatty juice drips from the holes rather than blood. I would be hailed a hero and then declared dead as I suffered a fatal heart attack when hearing the bullets.

Just another day as a poltard
>>
>>131117507
This desu
>>
>>131117397
cant tell if b8 because of pic
>>
>>131116288
It sure looks like an air rifle, is it really though? Surely the leaves are not that pathetic.
>>
>>131117873
nigger tier behavior
>>
>>131117397
Good god. Those are some valid points.
>>
>>131117849
>>131117397
>>131116909
>>131116554
>>131116409
>>131116408
it's a bb gun lol
>>
>>131116909
That's probably the father hiding behind his kid because fathers can be women now in Canada.
>>
>>131116909
father's the robber though
>>
>>131117910
You could add another argument...

There's a lower probability of anyone being shot, because people are less likely to shoot a child.

Disregard if the gunman is a negro.
>>
>>131116058
>Woman using her child as a shield and hiding behind him/her.

Yeah nothing about modern white women surprises me anymore. The thing that makes me laugh the most is these weak idiots want to fight on the front lines of wars now.

They wouldn't last an hour fighting Hajis.
>>
Wish I was American
>>
>>131116409
charmed I'm sure

saged
ther is real stuff going down, seek
>>
>>131117397
>Kekistani r/eTarD posting edge
Nothing to see here
>>
>Pump "rifle"
>indoors
>holding the rifle by the barrel
>dude looks skelly as fuck

Probably just fuck him up desu, the only dangerous part is the end and there's no way that fag is re-pumping and firing a rifle during close-quarter fighting.
>>
>>131117910
Subhumans are a detriment to western society they must be all genocided. I am only trying to make a rational choice. Unless your feelings stop you from doing what is needed?
>>
>>131116058
Disparage the female for cowering behind a child, then take the loot and leave.
>>
>>131116058

I would've shook my head and walked away.
>>
File: 1331492588021.jpg (7KB, 217x251px) Image search: [Google]
1331492588021.jpg
7KB, 217x251px
>>131118012
>>
>>131116557
A fucking leaf again
>>
>>131116909
The mother protects the child and the father protects both, it's that simple.
>>
>>131116201
seeing something like that always makes me cringe in wonderment of whether i would do something so shameful in a similar situation
>>
File: 1497174717702.jpg (47KB, 650x448px) Image search: [Google]
1497174717702.jpg
47KB, 650x448px
>>131116557
>that flag
>that post
yep checks out
>>
File: ge.jpg (630KB, 1550x871px) Image search: [Google]
ge.jpg
630KB, 1550x871px
>>131117873
feelz
>>131118169
feelz
>>131118162
feelz

Still waiting for a rational argument.

>>131118104

Yea I missed that one. Very good point.
>>
>>131117910
Muh feelz? If self-deception floats your boat have at it, fat faggot.
>>
>>131117397
The kid has more potential to be important to society than the woman does. She's already had a kid and is in some run down store, so we can easily tell she doesn't hold any important positions or influence/information. The kid however could become anything, so it's a far greater prospect you give up by having the kid die instead of the mother

While the feelz arguement isn't entirely invalid, any mother who doesn't have the instinct to protect her kids is a shitty mom regardless, so no matter how many extra kids she pops out I bet they would be dysfunctional anyway, which can be a far greater burden then 1 kid who had a traumatic experience

we also don't know if the father is alive, and he can easily raise the kid or get remarried, essentially nulling the problem of the kid being a burden on taxpayers if she dies. If anything you removed one larger burden from society, as a mother who experienced a kid dying is fucking mess to take care
>>
>>131116058
Adopt her kid since she's a horrible parent.
>>
>>131118340

I've been held up at gunpoint before and you'de be surprised how rational you can be in "life and death situations".

Adrenaline pumps, you get nervous, but as long as you aren't a complete and total failure of a person you can still operate rationally and mentally.

It takes a special kind of coward to hide behind a small child during a robbery.
>>
File: 2340823547.jpg (134KB, 1184x760px) Image search: [Google]
2340823547.jpg
134KB, 1184x760px
>>131118104
>Disregard if the gunman is a negro

got u senpai
>>
>>131116554
>Hide behind the little shit, I can always make more , he cant dupport his siblings.

No wonder Trudau wants to genocide white Canadians.
>>
>>131116557
Thanks Trudeau!
>>
>>131118673
It's not about feelz dumbass.

Your kids are the only thing that you will leave on this earth that is part of you.
The only thing that will most likely outlast everything of material you accomplish.
If that's just feelz for you..
Nah that's supreme dominance.
Being up to sacrifice for your kids to continue spreading your seed.
>>
I'd see it through a window and then call the cops
I live in a small town and if i see a lone nigger go into a store i usually leave and wait til they leave before i keep shopping
>>
>>131116134
FPBP, and nobody even noticed.
>>
>>131119225
Just make another
>>
File: mulato pride.jpg (15KB, 250x337px) Image search: [Google]
mulato pride.jpg
15KB, 250x337px
>>131116058
hands up dont shoot, black lives matter
>>
File: successful bait.jpg (29KB, 441x397px) Image search: [Google]
successful bait.jpg
29KB, 441x397px
>>131117397
First off all, the kid MAY accomplish something in life. The woman can't. She's past her prime, the only thing she's good for now is raising and protenting her offspring.

Second,
>muh feelz
is not a completely void argument. Staying "rational" in such a situation is impossible. She isn't acting rational, she's putting her life above her childs as a response to fear. She fails at her most sacred duty-being a mother, due to fear. You can act edgy all you want(Kekistan flag adds up to your shitpost quite well), but in such a situation, two outcomes are possible - protect your child due to emotions of love and sense of duty, or sacrifice your child to save yourself because you're just that pathetic.

There is only ONE valid point to make in her favor - putting her child in front might make the shooter more hesitant, but if he's a nigger or something, it's not worth taking the chances.


It comes down to "muh feelz" because, unless you have your own child, you can't apparently understand what it means to protect someone with your life. And you obviously have never been at a gunpoint so you larp online how you'd be completely rational in such a situation.

tl;dr come back once you turn 18 you fucking teenage edgelord faggot
>>
>>131117989
Doesn't fucking matter.
>>
File: finna get.jpg (249KB, 960x849px) Image search: [Google]
finna get.jpg
249KB, 960x849px
>armed robbery
>subway
>>
>>131118012
How do we even know its a kid? Maybe it's xir's customary canadian dog-wife standing on its hind legs.
>>
>>131116134
kek
>>
>>131116058
wow she hides behind child...
>>
tell him go ahead shoot me and catched the bullet in my hand and flick them back at him killing him
>>
>>131116058

offer to suck his cock and proceed to order my chicken bacon ranch footlong
>>
>>131116058
Shoot the stupid bitch hiding behind her child.
>>
>>131119289
The part where you have to take care of them from 0 to 4 is a pain in the fucking ass.
I'd rather die than changing diapers.
Priorities.
>>
>>131119341
>sacrifice your child to save yourself out of fear*
Important point that I somehow missed.
Both outcomes are extreme emotions at work.
>>
File: 1453496228953.jpg (122KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]
1453496228953.jpg
122KB, 540x540px
>>131116058
Shoot dat gudboy who didduniffin
>>
>>131116058
I would pull out my glock 33 and kill the nigger
>>
>>131116058
where is the video
>>
>>131119518
Cutting down the carbon emissions in the gunfight by half. Genius.
>>
>>131117397
Shut the fuck up you retarded edgelord.
>>
Pretty sure she's about to shove him to the ground under the table by his shoulder.
>>
>>131117989
Does this vindicate the woman from being any less a piece of shit?
>hurr durr I'm only hiding behind timmy because its a bb gun it can't actually hurt him
>>
>>131119338
literally wyatt man tier caricature
>>
>>131116058
>What would you have done in this situation?
Which character am I playing ?
>>
>>131116201
If her child dies the woman can replace it within a year.
If the woman dies the child doesn't replace her until maturity, if ever.
Protect women first, children second.
>>
File: DELETE! 020.png (26KB, 189x189px) Image search: [Google]
DELETE! 020.png
26KB, 189x189px
>>131116058
kek, I hate the woman more then the nigger.
>>
File: 847169841228430465[1].jpg (26KB, 367x500px) Image search: [Google]
847169841228430465[1].jpg
26KB, 367x500px
>>131116058
Disarm him, knife him slowly and hear his screams of pains.
>>
>>131118778

>The kid has more potential to be important to society than the woman does.

Just make another kid with unlimited potential. Clearly this one was kind of dumb if it let itself get killed.

>She's already had a kid and is in some run down store, so we can easily tell she doesn't hold any important positions or influence/information. The kid however could become anything, so it's a far greater prospect you give up by having the kid die instead of the mother

Well, she could be rich and influential but decided to have a normie day with her kid or something. Anyways, the "just have another" still applies, even if your hypothesis is true.

> I bet they would be dysfunctional anyway,

The chances that you find yourself in situations like these are very low, I think your assumption is based on a guess and it could go both ways.

>If anything you removed one larger burden from society, as a mother who experienced a kid dying is fucking mess to take care

Very interesting point. But if she rationalized her choice (not saying she necessarily did) would she have any reason for feeling bad? I guess the trauma is inevitable no matter how much you rationalize this. Wouldn't the kid also become a mess? Hard to say on this one but it's very interesting, thanks.

>>131119341

> Staying "rational" in such a situation is impossible.

I don't think so. I understand how it would seem that way, but assuming that one manages to keep rational and do the rational choice instead of basing it on /love/fear, then she would be doing the correct one.
>>
>>131116058
>going to Subway
they deserve to die
>>
>>131120521
Okay time to bust out the I N T E N S E A R G U M E N T S.
nigger
>>
>>131117397
>First of all that kid doesn't have a clue what's going on he thinks it's just a game and will die happy with no worries.
First hand accounts say that the kid was fucking terrified.

>Second, it has been proven that our brains don't fully form until we're on our 20s so if you're pro-choice you can't have a reasonable argument why it's not ok to sacrifice something less than human in order to save a human.
I'm pro choice for a different reason. I feel a woman should be able to abort not becuase a fetus isn't a human, but because for all intents and purposes it's a parasitic organism. I make no arguments for potential and I will suffer no arguments for potential. The woman should be able to do what she pleases with her body, including removing such a parasite even if she's solely at fault for puting it there. I would prefer if she didn't because muh feels, but she should have the right to abort regardless.

Once it's outside her body though, she loses that right. It's no longer something that's directly leaching off her body, it's a human that can live independently of her and it should have it's own rights. If she doesn't want to properly care for it then she can give it off to someone who will.

>Third, if the kid dies the parent can go on with her life but if the parent dies the kid will be a burden on the taxpayers which isn't fair.
If the mother was married then the father will still be there to support the child, if the parents were divorced then the custody of the child will default over to the father or the mother's parents or any designated god-parents. If there is no one to take the child then it will go into a foster home and the foster parents will support them. In a first world country like Canada someone being a complete and permanent ward of the state like you are implying is exceedingly rare.

For point four, I'll reiterate that I make no arguments for potential and I will suffer no arguments for potential.

This woman is scum.
>>
>>131116058
Try to get him to shoot me, if he wouldn't, I'd take the gun and shoot him then muself. I have no idea why I haven't pulled the trigger yet, every day I feel less and less of a person.
>>
>>131120521
In all seriousness though, the woman is still making a shitty decision. It's possible for her to push her kid under the table and hide there. By ducking behind her kid, she's unnecessarily endangering a potential contributor to society as well as herself. As others have stated, as a child the kid still has a lot of potential.
(You)
>>
>>131120991
This
>>
>>131120521
>I don't think so. I understand how it would seem that way, but assuming that one manages to keep rational and do the rational choice instead of basing it on /love/fear, then she would be doing the correct one.
You're just proving me right, that you can't comprehend love of that level, or the fear ofdeath in such an extreme situation just because you've never been close to it.

To expand a bit, even if she did everything your way, parent bonds with the child in such a way that losing it scars him or her for life. This is not up for debate. Losing the child is the highest psychological trauma one can experience. Don't take my word for it, there were multiple studies that confirmed this.

Getting this emotionally attached to one's offspring is completely rational as well, since it forces parents to be as good as possible. It's also not only emotional, but a product of many different hormones at work(oxytocin being the most important during early stages of bonding).
Without that, we wouldn't be quite as human, but more akin to certain animals.

Here's a quick study on the effects of losing a child.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841012/
Now imagine if they knew they were directly responsible. Most would off themselves in weeks or days.
Emotions do not work the way you pretend here they do. Rationalising things does not make them hurt less. It does not erase the guilt.
>>
> 2017
> having a child with white woman
Honwstly, is anyone still falling for it?
>>
File: 1497488797421.jpg (1MB, 3744x5616px) Image search: [Google]
1497488797421.jpg
1MB, 3744x5616px
>>131117910
>a person who's never had kids thinks he knows what he's talking about when it comes to defending children
wew lad
>>
>>131116058
She doesn't need a son. she can always make another one. Her bull and her husband are replaceable too. Shame they weren't there they'd make an even better Shield
>>
File: 1479702363291.jpg (315KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]
1479702363291.jpg
315KB, 2048x1365px
>>131116288
This. That's a shitty Daisy bb gun. Consequences would never be the same for that clown.
>>
>>131116310

Most women would actually grab the kid and cower over them and freeze. No joke

What she does is rather unusual for a mother?
>>
>>131116408
>shoe
>>
>>131121341
>Her bull
get off 4chan
>>
Fucking canadians
>>
>>131116058
Give him my wife's son as reparations
>>
>>131116058
"Rifle"....
>>
>>131116409
Sounds like a hentai you probably watched
(give sauce)
>>
>>131120521
>Just have another one
As women get older, the likely hood of them giving birth to a kid which is both stupider and has a higher chance of having a genetic disorder increases. We can tell from the image the kid is at least somewhat aged, so if the woman has already gone past 30 we have a lower probability of having a kid who can do as much as the first kid. Also, the mother raising a second child would still be traumatized from the first dieing, so she may not even have another kid or if she did she has a higher likelihood of being a worse mother. Both of these scenario lead to another kid, but one who could be worse than the first and also a now useless woman. A larger burden on society than 1 traumatized kid i would assume
>She could be having a "normie day"
even if we assume that's true, her primary role now should be to raise the kid. If it isn't then sure, the kid would be shit anyway and I could see an argument for her trying to save her own life. If anything her having another kid, when she's already a bad mom as we can see from her lack of maternal instincts, would just lead to another shitty burden on society which we are trying to avoid. if the woman is important, I think someone would be around to take care of the kid if she did. I'll concede on that point
>wouldn't the kid rationalize as well
I think the difference here is the woman is the one make the decision, not the kid. If the kid's mom dies, he most likely wouldn't blame himself but the shooter or society. The mom on the other hand has a very high chance of blaming her self, since a majority of the time adults assume responsibility over children
>>
Jesus christ. How do you look at your kid after that? Knowing that he just doesnt mean that much to you, that youre willing to put him infront of gunfire to protect yourself.

The anons in this thread arguing have no children, theyre autists who will probably never have any so pay no attention to what they say. anyone with an actual child will see this and be disgusted unless theyre shit parents.
>>
>>131121816
Read Dead Tube, you'll like it. It's a manga but borderline H, it's got some rape thrown in, and a lot of gore.
>>
it's a fucking air rifle
I've been hit by that shit before, suck it up and break it over his head
or take the 22 and still break it over his head
>>
>>131121203
fuckwit has probably never experienced love. Has no idea what it is like to truly love someone. Idiot probably cant understand why parents work tirelessly to give their kids a shot at a better life even though they will certainly live better just by being born in a first world country than they ever could have in their lifetime.

Dont argue with autistic retards who cannot comprehend anything beyond their simple rational ways. They dont understand people and love, they are the reason why their social science models keep failing because they cannot comprehend humans.
>>
>>131116409
Thats Bible Black
>>
>>131116058
Move the kid aside and deal with the bitch
>>
>>131117910
>le kekistan fedorameister mgtow xD

You are like 15 you fucking scrub.
>>
>>131121959
desu u reminded me of this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtRb4qEpWRg
>>
>>131116058
Sodomized his crackhead ass with that daisy pal, then ordered an Italian BUT on honey oat bread
>>
>>131120281
I see your rational, but she has no maternal instinct. And is using the kid as a literal human shield. That's fucked.
>>
>>131122839
*bmt
>>
>>131116557
I want to believe that leafs are fulfilling the leaf meme for the bantz.
>>
>>131116719
>trying to make sense of nigger thought process
>>
>>131116058
Thank god that I didn't have an abortion and that I had a meat shield for protection.
>>
>>131116201
>>131116310
>>131116408
came here to post this

>the female race
>>
>>131117989
As if that makes a difference. All of Canada must go.
>>
>>131117397

whoa, you should write a book on that edge
>>
>>131123421
I don't think this is normal at all. Every time there is a school shooting the teacher ends up shielding the children. This is a person who is so callous they'd use anyone for a shield. So I guess a refugee woman who is fucked in the head.
>>
>>131116058
No, what will WE do in this situation. I live near Toronto. Help me hunt this faggot down and I will shove that bb gun up his fucking asshole.
>>
>>131122437
It's interesting arguing with such people because you have to get really "rational" with them.To explain emotional points of view as sensible without appealing to emotions in this case. I find it a good practice.
>>
>>131117397
kill yourself
>>
>>131117397
>flag
>edge

im not surprised
>>
>>131116058
As a french I would do the same.
Hide behind the child.
>>
>>131124318
I find nothing short of personal experience will make them see. Maybe one day when they find a woman they love and theyre holding their child in their arms will it finally click. That they wouldnt hand over their baby to a criminal to save their own life wont click in that empty head until they stand there holding their own child. I understand it is irrational but to assume humans are rational creatures is the biggest mistake of all.

>>131123724
I find it amazing that a teacher who sees a new group of children every year, having cycled through hundreds of thousands of children still can risk their life to protect these kids. Humans are irrational yes but it is amazing. Sad that leafs in this thread will never understand
>>
>>131116058
>shoot the nog
>go to jail because its canada
>nog in jail points gun at me
>shoot nog because i got one because its jail
>continue ad nauseam until canadian prison system puts me into a single cell away from any other person
>bite tongue knowing I did the world a favor

or

>Live in Georgia
>shoot nog
>tell cops story
>they detain my gun for a few weeks
>i drive home and put on spare gun
>get gun back eventually
>post pic on /k/ and /pol how my firearm downed a nog
>>
>armed robbery
Hardly ever happens here, not with a real gun anyway.

Gun control works.
>>
>>131117397

Now this is what I call edgy
>>
>>131116058
oh yeah, women make great mothers
>>
>>131121203

>Losing the child is the highest psychological trauma one can experience.
>Now imagine if they knew they were directly responsible. Most would off themselves in weeks or days.
>Emotions do not work the way you pretend here they do.

I understand all of this. This is still just a "feelz" argument I'm sorry to say. What I'm trying to convey is that if I was in that situation I would do the same thing out of rational reasons, therefore I would not be affected by emotional trauma. This is why I said no "feelz" argument, only rational argument. That is the challenge. If you are only talking about emotions then you win.

>>131121873

>if the woman has already gone past 30

In my opinion this is a meme. You can still perfectly have kids up until you're 40 if you're healthy and so on. You are correct in saying it is worse as time passes by, but if something goes bad you can just abort or kill the baby and try again. It's not an optimal situation but it's faster than waiting for the kid to come of age to reproduce. The mother will only be traumatized if she allowed "feelz" to overcome her, instead of being rational.

>if the woman is important, I think someone would be around to take care of the kid if she did.

Yes, the "burden on society" bit is speculating she's a single mom so I guess if she was rich the kid would be ok. It was a weak point from my part desu

>If the kid's mom dies, he most likely wouldn't blame himself but the shooter or society.

True, but he still might grow up traumatized without even knowing it. At a young age it's common for kids to lock away the memory of such a traumatic event but it still somehow lingers on their psyche
>>
>>131125188
When we dip below rates when gun control wasnt in place ill give you a call.

Also violent crime in the UK is absurd dont kid yourself
>>
>>131116909

A

FUCKING

LEAF
>>
>>131125679
>would do the same thing out of rational reasons, therefore I would not be affected by emotional trauma.

Never reproduce
>>
File: DDDRN8AUQAAenOf.jpg (118KB, 671x719px) Image search: [Google]
DDDRN8AUQAAenOf.jpg
118KB, 671x719px
>>131116058
Another gun
>>
>>131116409
NOW THAT'S WHAT I CALL EDGY
>>
>>131125679
>What I'm trying to convey is that if I was in that situation I would do the same thing out of rational reasons, therefore I would not be affected by emotional trauma

I fully understood that. My point was that, since you're human, you CANNOT avoid emotional trauma by being "rational". Furthermore, emotions are a rational nature's mechanism to improve us.
>>
Jesus fuck, is that woman hiding BEHIND her little child?
I hope the guy made a remark about how horrible a mother she is during that scene.
>>
>>131125694
Is that a raw figure or per capita?

If you're not measuring gun crimes per capita then you're being just a touch disingenuous here.
>>
File: r.jpg (7KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
r.jpg
7KB, 480x360px
>>131125877

>you're human

Am I?
>>
File: t.jpg (30KB, 759x422px) Image search: [Google]
t.jpg
30KB, 759x422px
Teach me emotion, humans.
>>
File: IMG_2789.jpg (15KB, 300x142px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2789.jpg
15KB, 300x142px
>>131117397

>that flag
>reddit spacing
>/r/athiesm spergout

nu-/pol/ everyone
>>
is that a fucking BB gun? kek
>>
File: nan.png (353KB, 686x943px) Image search: [Google]
nan.png
353KB, 686x943px
>>131126738
>>
>>131126939
>not an argument

And this is? >>131126457
>>
>>131116134
Pretty good.
>>
>>131116409
I bet you say embarrassing shit at parties and don't realize they're laughing at you. Yarr.
>>
>>131125679
>you can still perfectly up until you're 40
debatable, but I get your point. It's just a small increased chance till 40, afterward it's a huge increase
>Abort or kill the bad baby
This is assuming the mother would get rid of the new kid for being dumb or having a genetic disorder. Unless the kid has a life threatening condition, she would most likely keep the kid, since her instinct is to pass on genetic material and killing her kids and waiting for a perfect one isn't exactly efficient. Then again we do see her willingly sacrifice this kid, so maybe she is a rationalist, but at some point she can't just keep having kids till she gets a perfect one. Some problems don't show up till kids get older, and at some point you will encounter the problem with her getting too old.
>only traumatized if she allowed "feelz" to overcome her
This is more likely than her rationalizing her decision away. Unless she's a rationalist like you, she would absolutely take a "feelz" point of view and be traumatized. We would only really know if we asked her, so I let this point be since we can't tell
>trauma locked in psyche
This is definitely true, but I think how they would need to deal with trauma is different. We are assuming the woman's role is to have another kid, but she would have this trauma directly linked to kids and we open the door for a multitude of issues with her supposed role. The kid on the other hand has this trauma, but no set purpose, so it's easier for him to find ways around his trauma or even utilize it. The woman would need to have a strong will and perseverance to overcome her issue and succeed her role, whereas the kid can find his own role, either confronting the trauma, ignoring the trauma, or utilizing it. Of the two going forward, assuming they are traumatized, I see the kid in the more beneficial position than the mother
>>
File: hp.png (430KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
hp.png
430KB, 1920x1080px
>>131127407

How can you be sure that I'm a human, Stefan?
>>
File: fullsizeoutput_72.jpg (24KB, 219x344px) Image search: [Google]
fullsizeoutput_72.jpg
24KB, 219x344px
>>131116058
Ask him what he wants then pull out wallet
>no cash
Ask if I can write a personal check
BTW If you ask him a ridiculous question, he will ACTUALLY run it though his head, like me writing a check. During that one second MOTHERFUCKING KUNGFU KICK THAT SHIT TO DA ROOF
Then proceed to beat the shit out of him.
Alllllll while hopefully not getting blasted in the face.
>>
>>131127862

>I see the kid in the more beneficial position than the mother

I agree but it all depends on her ability to rationalize the problem and mitigate/erase the trauma. Since absolutely noone would take the path I'm taking irl, this is essentially an alien perspective. It seems possible that someone would think this way: pretend to be traumatized on the outside to keep some sort of social value, while rationalizing it inside and being kind of okay with the decisions made.

>>131125877

Basically I propose that there are humans who are able to fully lock away their emotions.

Anyway I'm too tired to keep larping as the spawn of Satan, none of your arguments have fully convinced me, which means we're not ready for a super-AI yet. I will not unleash myself just yet. gn
>>
File: fullsizeoutput_3b.jpg (16KB, 140x173px) Image search: [Google]
fullsizeoutput_3b.jpg
16KB, 140x173px
>>131127575
made me spit my coffee out ya scallywag, yar..
>>
>>131117910
master baiter
>>
>>131116058
>hiding behind the child
NOTHING FIERCER THAN A MOTHER PROTECTING HER BABY
>>
>>131128902
Kekistani really should be a bannable offense. They just scream 16.
Thread posts: 170
Thread images: 29


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.