le liberal strawman face

u mad liebowitz

>>131085954
>debates

Calling what the mainstream media does "debating" is retarded. Getting 2-3 pundits together and giving them 90 seconds to scream over each other is just more distraction and bullshit. Just so one faggot can say...."Gotcha" with a sound bite and claim victory. Turn off your TV ya fuckin Zombie.

>>131086768
Stop watching CNN. Even liberals don't like CNN because of precisely that.

>Every 'debate' on his show is either him going against a low-hanging fruit liberal caricature or an intelligent liberal whose arguments he continually misrepresents.
It's called Tucker Porn for a reason, Shlomo
Sage

File: Education-of-news-media-viewers.png (27KB, 295x688px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 295x688px

>>131085954
Why do you watch FOX News, nigger?

Too dumb to read the New York Times?

>>131085954
Because it's entertaining.

File: BTFO.png (560KB, 854x478px) Image search: [Google]

560KB, 854x478px

Because he gets liberals fired.

>>131085954
>A hah he he ha
>Alright alright, I am going to ask you one more time
>Tucker the question is complicated.
>Just answer the question! Simple question, yes or no?
>Tucker I am not going to play this game.
>A he ha hehahah were out of time, thanks for coming on.

>this thread again

>>131087095
I consume everything. It's the only way to know what's really going on.

Also, Tucker Carlson is fun to watch even though he is wrong on almost everything and his formula is bullshit.

>>131087385
Her appearance is exactly the kind of bullshit I'm talking about.

He looks like he's always taking a fat dump

>>131087489
I'll admit he is certainly good at using the format to his advantage to catch intelligent people off guard and make them look silly. However it is intellectually dishonest. Often those questions he asks are attempted "gotchas" that the guest can rightfully sense, so they avoid answering in the super precise way Tucker wants. Or when they do answer, Tucker will be completely dismissive of their answer.

This is what happened on the global warming debate he had with Bill Nye. Tucker kept pressing him on "what percentage of climate change is man made?" Nye was clearly avoiding answering precisely (either because he didn't know the number, didn't want to say, or because he needed to think of an answer), and it didn't make Nye look good, but when Nye finally gave an answer (by answering how the climate would be without the industrial revolution), Tucker just completely dismissed the answer as "political" and attacked Nye's credentials. (Nye is not a PhD, but you don't need to be to teach basic science and he is respected as a science communicator within the scientific community).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN5L2q6hfWo

Tucker's butthurt is underrated. He loves to throw in snide comments but goes bananas when it's done to him.