Russian interference denialists BTFO

>WaPo

why do they even try anymore?

>>131069724
>it all starts with a top secret memo that only 4 people are allowed to read, that we have also read and are reporting to you now in great detail

Excuse me?

>>131070384
That's why it's called investigative journalism dumb fuck. You think Bob Woodward and Carl Berstein just called up Nixon and asked him "did you order the Watergate coverup" and he told them "yeah, I did it"?

>>131070384
you are thinking too much hans, you are not supposed to think, just accept what is being said

>>131070625
investigative journalism is dead

>>131070384
clinton emailed it to them

File: image.jpg (11KB, 278x181px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 278x181px

>>131069724
>Implying anybody here but Nu-/pol/ cares about "democracy"

>>131070740

It's dying for sure, but there are a few outlets that are still capable of investigative journalism: NYT, WSJ and WaPo are the best in the US.

>>131069724
>defeat or at least damage the Democratic nominee
the Democrats defeated themselves the moment they nominated Killary

>>131070625
>investigative journalism
the word you are looking for is high treason

Fiction. Will be a Hollywood movie before long.

1) The Russian dossier was fake. I've read it, and I think I could have written it based upon internet searches.
2) The DNC server was not hacked...that is why the FBI was never permitted to examine the server. And let's not forget Seth Rich.
3) No voting machines were ever hacked, no vote totals changed.

If there was a foreign country that physically attempted to interfere with the election, it was Mexico:
1) Millions of non-citizens voted in the Presidential election, the vast majority being Mexicans.
2) The principal owner of the NYT is a Mexican billionaire, Carlos Slim.

>>131072322

>shilling this hard

kill yourself.

>>131070625
When Woodward and Bersetein reported on the Watergate coverup, they had fucking evidence. The whistleblower gave them the first leads, but they didn't publish based solely on the words of an anonymous tipster, they investigated further, chased down more leads, found copies of files and logs, etc.

WaPo and NYT and all the MSM outlets are just publishing shit based completely on the say-so of "anonymous sources" and "people familiar with so-and-so's thinking" without doing any other investigation.

Journalism, at least at the mainstream level, has become less about investigating the truth and more about publishing the party line.