Thread replies: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Why is being for human biodiversity (HBD) perceived as being racist? 2017-06-23 04:08:33 Post No. 131016614
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Why is being for human biodiversity (HBD) perceived as being racist? 2017-06-23 04:08:33 Post No. 131016614
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: fd69f-people.jpg (37KB, 300x423px) Image search:
[Google]
37KB, 300x423px
Why is being for human biodiversity (HBD) perceived as being racist?
Anonymous
2017-06-23 04:08:33
Post No. 131016614
[Report]
We live in a multicultural world full HBD. Each country has its own culture and customs, yet if I were to say I support Europe being predominantly white, Africa being predominantly black, etc. I'm somehow magically a racist.
Personally, I believe certain genes have evolved and are acclimated to certain climates. This is why certain Continents have a predominance of specific races. It isn't just because "they were there first". For example, African Americans have a higher incidence of prostate cancer than Caucasians in the United States. The reason being is because they are further from the equator, requiring more time outside in the sun to receive adequate vitamin D. To make matters worse for African Americans, the United States is a first world country with a sedentary lifestyle. The issue with vitamin D inadequacy extends beyond the immune system as there is a direct correlation linking intelligence to the immune system and a healthy microbiota. I'm not saying ship blacks in the United States back to Africa. However, we should get rid of laws like Affirmative Action that try to elevate races to compete in an environment they were never evolutionarily designed to compete in. If they cannot survive on an even playing field, let them go extinct in the United States.
With the refugee crisis the West is being forced to experience, the push for multiculturalism appears to be an attempt to destroy HBD globally, and this push is truly the epidome of racism.
How is it racist for factually stating blacks are at a great disadvantage in the United States due to biology? Why is it seen as racist to suggest HBD is in humanity's interest as a lack of biodiversity could result in a higher probability of our species succumbing to extinction? Why would a country experiencing low population bring in refugees from areas of the world experiencing overpopulation?
>Why did you red pill me /pol/? Why!?!?
>>
>>131016614
Because postmodernism suggests superficial diversity (exterior appearance) is the most important diversity, while diversity of perspective/opinion is deplorable by comparison. It's this kind of regressive trite we shouldn't give any attention besides to laugh in their face.
Also we shoulsnt call them liberals because they objectively are not liberals. It's a tad bit longer to say but we need to call them what they are: postmodernists
>>
>>131016954
Sounds like they're extreme Collectivists (Communists) more concerned with how the commune is perceived rather than the individual. Are they such pussies and afraid of responsibility that they would rather cede all freedoms to prevent an intelligent conversation from making their head explode? What will happen to humanity in a world that punishes and breeds out creativity?
Thread posts: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1