As for Rowling; what a sad, ineffective, decadent sack of shit. Some of my wingnut pals kept talking about "wingardium leviosa" and "expecto patronum." I even used to know one of her publishers, who went on for months about how mind blowing Rowling's books were gonna be [...] Her books are the sheerest gorp. Mystical garbage, with less substance than a George MacDonald short story. This is a common pattern for shitlib losers: John Green wrote The Fault in Our Stars after realizing how much money it would make him to appeal to the lowest common demoninator. Suzanne Collins with her dumb assed Hunger Games; same deal. Some of the young adult novelists got into literal navel gazing: shouting "yaaas" and "slay queen."
I can never take the wizard tinkerbells over at Pottermore seriously, since they keep gabbling on about Rowling. It's like pretending Stephen King is a serious thinker. Shit, even C.S. Lewis; a man who confused being Christian with being English: Lewis has vastly more substance to him than Rowling.
Harry Potter is the refuge of illiterate fools who have given up hope in life. I was attracted to this sort of garbage when I was a pot smoking teenager, because "ooo, spooky, dementors" -and as a result of knowing about it, I have met a lot of such people much later in life. There is a very common pattern among Pottery jackasses who are over the age of 20: they are almost always completely ineffectual human beings. They can't pull it together to shave, shower, learn skills and dress well: they must cast magic spells for sex and money. Instead of reading books by wise men, they read books by and for fools, and develop encyclopediac knowledge from secret grimoires they purchased at Barnes and Noble, next to the sections on rolfing, aromatherapy and yoga. They feel very daring because they'd sell their souls to the devil. Most of them have no soul which is worth anything, so the devil laughs at them and keeps them losers.
butism
>>131014555
>says the butist
uhhhhhhhhhhhhh
>>131014708
bmfao