Are whites the result of domestication?

>>130974002
I would say no but we definitely have a nack for it

>>130974002
civilization definitely makes a mark on genetics

>>130974002
Is it we who are domesticated, or do we domesticate others?

>>130975621
It's we who are domesticated by our societies. Look at all of the feral tribes selecting fitness and how they have no diversity in eye color and hair color. Domesticated animals show diversity in fur color and in eye color not found in their wild relatives.

File: IMG_3839.jpg (27KB, 640x213px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 640x213px

>>130975844
Forgot pic

>>130975224
Why would you say no? Tribal people still almost all look the same, civilizations developed very distinct breeds the same way dog breeds were developed.

File: 1489224462658.jpg (181KB, 917x688px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 917x688px

>>130974002
We domesticate ourselves. It's called dual inheritance - not only are we our "breeders," choosing who to breed with and who to let die out, our genes influence our culture and our culture influences gene selection. That's why ideology and politics and the degree of collectivism can vary from race to race and country to country. Evolution isn't linear and raw IQ isn't the only thing that's important for reproductive fitness. So it's not as simple as feral -> domesticated or chaos -> order, because whites are a type of the outcome of natural selection, not the only outcome

>>130974002
They're the result of the enviroment they lived in(cold, dark bogs and forests), nothing to do with domestication. In fact, the 'white' races lived as "primitive" hunter-gatherers for thousands of years.


>>130975844
This is not correct. There are wolves and bears and many others species of wild animals with many shades of fur.

File: 1497488120368.png (491KB, 1547x1512px) Image search: [Google]

491KB, 1547x1512px

>>130976552
Also a product of unique genetic mutations and breeding strategies, but unlike dogs, there are many more characteristics today that can lead to a person having a reproductive advantage than likewise for a dog.

Humans also submit to a greater collective today in a way that has lasting influence. We punish the violent and murderous and destructive (or otherwise antisocial) and reward the productive and compliant and social. The term "breeds" is honestly a simplification when we apply it to ourselves

>>130974002
Americans are the result of domestication

yes, the jew looks upon the gentile like cattle, or dogs. we are crossbred in much the same way.

>>130974002
My pet hypothesis is that harsh winters over generations caused it.
We needed to grow our food/preserve it and ration it to survive every year. If you lacked forethought and work ethic you would freeze/starve to death without breeding. Likewise we had months every year where we were mostly inside with our families. This caused us to have strong familial bonds and tolerance for interacting with people without the need for violence. It also presented us with time to read, invent, and philosophies.

Asians had similar winters in many areas.