I see what (((they))) are doing in response to Trump, and it makes me believe that MSM, Hollywood, and other institutions simply transitioned their past political agendas into written history.
I was born the same day the Berlin Wall fell, so I wouldn't even know what a president was until Clinton was already in office. Can someone with more wisdom and/or knowledge evaluate American leaders honestly?
Nixon. Bad. War on drugs (war on fourth amendment). Closing the gold window (war on cash).
Regan. Hmmmm. I wonder if he knew he was rearming the deep state for global war.
I don't know about Reagan. I suspect he was a good man.
>>130952257
Thank you for that perspective. It seems like you are more interested in the an-cap angle than JQ/1488.
I was stunned when I realized that Nixon is labeled as the most corrupt president AND was the most outspoken about JQ. That can't possibly be a coincidence, right?
>>130951861
Nixon is actually pretty based.
He's just a brilliant conniving man that tried to secure as much political power as possible.
Brilliant politician, definitely looked out only for himself and proceeded to fuck everyone else even in the tiniest detail.
I read an interesting paper by Andrew L Johns on how he used the Vietnam War to hijack the republican party.
Reagan is solely responsible for the modern political climate. He basically founded neo-conservatism and the current party system in the US.
Both of them were pretty bad, but the only good thing Reagan did was his work with Gorbachev; even that is vastly outdone by Nixon's detente and tenacity in fighting communism around the world and in the US (Watergate).
tl;dr Nixon gets a bad rap but both are really shitty
pic unrelated
>>130951861
Nixon was redpilled
Reagan is the founding father of cuckservatism
>>130954351
>Watergate
Watergate is used as an example of Nixon's evil corruption, but you say it was a good thing? Wasn't he trying to dig up dirt on the Dems to use against them? I assume this was routine practice (and probably still is today).