Leftists are wrong about how to fix it

The answer is already here and its blockchain technology.

>>130811406
Rich people are the only ones able to fund technological research, technology is the only thing that allowed the comfortable existence in the west.

Capitalistic races in farming, pharmacy, vehicle production etc. etc. were the things that allowed western civilization happen in the first place. Patriarchy was the main force behind technological advancement. If not for all of this, we would still be on africa level.

Now you fucking cunts are trying to undermine all of this and ruin it again, fuck you.

Take their wealth and give it back to the people

it's that simple

>>130811887
Hey man i'm on your side, I just think that's just a little bit too much power for 5 people.

>>130812280
fuck off you pinko scum REEEEEEEE

File: ifDPSce.jpg (499KB, 1209x914px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 1209x914px

>>130812280
Suprise suprise
99% of rich and nobility managed to pay some people and run away before the storm, because they can afford it, unlike the poor.
Now there is completely no money, just like in every commie country.

And before you'll start talking about virtue, you would do the same if you were rich, but you are a poor, resentful cunt.

>>130812485
We all know it's the only way boy. They're not gonna give your stuff back out of the goodness of their hearts

>>130811406
eat the rich

I mean gates is one of those people and he only build a small part of Microsoft, and stole the rest. Zuckerburg too.

>>130812619
and you think the people tasked with "seizing the wealth" will?

>>130813148
maybe, maybe not, but it's worth trying

[spoiler]niiggas[/spoiler]

>>130813205
>let's try the same shit for the fourth time, this time it will succeed

>>130811887
Africa and the Middle East have worse wealth inequality than the West and are way more patriarchal, I don't see a lot of innovation coming out of those places. Innovation has nothing to do with wealth inequality by itself, it's our retarded patent/copyright laws and corporate welfare that put a select few over all other innovators. Breakthrough medical treatments of recent aren't affordable and not even an option for virtually anyone cause of big pharma. It's disproportionately white people who are affect by shitty outdated prescription drugs killing them and it's a leading cause for the decline in the white proportion of the population as white birth rates aren't enough to offset shitskin immigration, abiet immigration has declined recently, there was a lot of immigration from shitskin countries in the later decades of the 20th century due to loosened immigration policies.

File: 1494943007899.png (165KB, 1426x905px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1426x905px

>>130811511
fpbp

>>130812584
Name one fucking time in history where a country collapsed cause the rich left. Expats from Commie countries weren't rich, not even the Jewish ones.

>>130811406
Stop using their money go back to barter or precious metal coins minted by private issuers. Avoid fiat government currency since most of these globalist bastards are stealing from all of us through inflation.

Great, another episode of middle class anons in the comfort of their mothers homes explaining to all of us why so few individuals should hold so much of the wealth even though they don't create jobs, don't spend it productively, and horde it in banks most of the time.

And honestly, that's fine. Your opinion is fine. But just know that these people that you defend to hold all this wealth will be put on spikes and paraded around town, and any one of you fucking homo's that speak up will be right there with him.

I get it, it's edgy to be a blowhard and pick the side that has all the power because it makes you the douche in the situation. People are going to get fed up, though, and you're going to have to face the consequences in the end.

File: concern.jpg (66KB, 743x928px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 743x928px

>>130811406
>people have more money than me
>how do we solve this problem

What did he mean by this?

>>130811406
>rich people exist
Why is this a problem?

>>130811406
>But we clearly have a problem: 5 men currently own almost half the wealth of half of the world.
>I'm no communist, but how do we solve this problem?
I agree. IMO the problem isn't inequality in-of-itself it's that (((they))) have so much influence and power.
High taxes won't do shit, they'll still have all the power.
There needs to be some sort of freeze, confiscate and purge approach.

>>130816407
Venezuela

>>130812403
i'm with this guy. fucking hate commies, but there are anti trust laws for a reason. they need to be enforced. here in the us, it's that simple. break up amazon. before it's too late.

>>130811406
Why is equality of outcome a virtue for you?

How would a tax on capital gains help empower the poor to save money?

>>130811406
after 27 years of seeing the mediocrity of everyone i run into, i think they deserve their billions. they did something worthwhile, unlike everyone else. keep your money and have fun shitting on the untermensch.

>>130816019
For a patriarchal system to work the men in charge has to at least be intelligent.

>>130816407
Just google Capital Flight and you'll get tons of results. Every country that bows to socialism experiences some form of capital flight, the amount usually depends on how much of the economy will be state dependent.

>>130811406
5 people owning almost half of the wealth in the world is a sign of how efficient we have become at having as few people as possible doing nothing but controlling capital.

Changing this would mean becoming less efficient at having as few as possible decide how to allocate capital. The added decision makers would inevitably decide to consume rather than create more capital which would ultimately negatively affect production.

So you would have more people making the decisions about what to do with capital ( including not making more capital, but opting for consumption ) and end up with less capital in the long run. This would lead to lower productivity and higher goods prices and higher propensity among those making decisions to consume.

In current real life we see those who do not consume accumulating capital. Those who consume rather than spend to accumulate capital find themselves without much capital under their control - they fire themselves from the job of controlling capital by spending money on consumption.

If you think the rich are parasites, you should be all for concentration of wealth. Because of the law of diminishing returns, they consume a smaller percentage of their wealth than any other class.

Of course you may be a luddite and want inefficiency for aesthetic reasons. That is understandable. But then you must accept the suffering and warishness that lower productivity than we are accustomed to would mean.

If we bomb each other back to the Stone Age, we'll have more widespread control of less overall wealth.

Just ban money and start new money, laugh at the jews, bully jews, call jews parasites, publicly humiliate jews, seize assets of jews, call jews "trash genes", ban usury and then hunt jews, kill them if they don't fuck off to israel and let the palestinians go, then have all countries nuke israel at the same time.

>>130819782
At last Based Anon. The answer to any and all problems is "gas the Kikes". Top five richest people? Solved.

>>130814274
Exactly, I don't really see a solution, if we tax the top tier, they'll just buy a country and make their own taxes. If we tax everybody we'll stagnate and run out of capital.

>>130818506
great post

>>130816775
Too much power cit. George Soros, Bildurburg, etc.

>>130818506
I ike the contrarianism Kekistani but nah.

The problem is that so few have already made decisions about MASS production and transmit that imposition via MARKETING, freeing others up NOT to make decisions with limited capital but instead consume without cretive input.

Efficiency is not needed except where it is needed. To "slow the economy down" in some areas will reduce waste and increase satisfaction both as an employee and consumer.

Another thing is how many minds are actually on any given project to prevent critical failure and create critical success. Those people need reassurances and a fair cut/ walking around money. They need stability.

This is the kind of thing that i want for the UK.

>>130820726
The rothschildian banking system is what led to the oligarchy of the west. We must end usury in our nations and the only way to do that is remove though that practice it.

Jews must go.

>>130816646
Kek pot meet kettle

>>130817149
sounds like pitchforks and torches and guillotines to me, just on paper.

>>130817583
I didn't say to give it to the poor, infrastructure or something else maybe, I also don't think that'll work since they'd likely cut bait and run.

>>130818506
Well, when you put it that way. KEK I guess we really to have a good, albeit imperfect, system.

I mean I've always known this but i'm just suspicious when I see numbers like that, and obviously so do the commie scum. Why is half the country enslaved into wanting to tank the entire capital system?

>>130824034
This, fag has a point with inefficiency, the problem with that is the people running the sanctions or whatever, would likely be corrupted, bought out, etc. just like every other fucking gov't program.

>>130811406
It's not a problem. They have more wealth than most of the world because they've produced more value than most of the world. If you could invent a device as useful as a computer and market it at a good price you'd join them

julie was hottie

File: 1473489678216.jpg (60KB, 509x623px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 509x623px

R E V O L U T I O N

Put the piggies in a blanket.
Fry the porkies.

>>130811511
Correct. Fiat is the biggest scam in the history of the world. Until we destroy the dollar we'll never be free

>>130811406
Why is it a problem?

Oh right because you were told by leftist that it is a problem.

>>130812280
Kill communist pukes, it is that simple.