GOP Analytics Firm Voter Data Leaked!

File: Deep Root Files.jpg (109KB, 636x726px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 636x726px

So now what?

File: 978945673.jpg (23KB, 439x290px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 439x290px

What what?

"""""""""""""""""""""accidentally leaked"""""""""""""""""""

>>130805759
Seems like a big step toward voter intimidation. "I will never trust the Republican party ever again." I smell a deep state rat.

who gives a Fuck?

File: Deep Root Specific Voters.jpg (89KB, 800x378px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 800x378px

>>130806264
It seems that Deep Root Analytics had detailed estimates of likely voter opinion that went down to the individual voter. Somehow all of that information was leaked or hacked. The article says leaked which implies someone betraying them or the company itself showing off its assets.

tl;dr You are a number in someone's lost excel spreadsheet.

>>130806516

>Spreadsheets acquired from TargetPoint, which partnered with Deep Root and GOP Data Trust during the 2016 election, include the home addresses, birthdates, and party affiliations of nearly 200 million registered voters in the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, as well as some 2016 voters. TargetPoint’s data seeks to resolve questions about where individual voters stand on dozens of political issues. For example: Is the voter eco-friendly? Do they favor lowering taxes? Do they believe the Democrats should stand up to Trump? Do they agree with Trump’s “America First” economic stance? Pharmaceutical companies do great damage: Agree or Disagree?

61% of the US population.

>>130806528
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""Somehow""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

>>130806577
who gives a Fuck?

File: Deep Root Names and Addresses.jpg (82KB, 800x428px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 800x428px

>>130806631
My bet is that there is either a mole or this is a marketing ploy. I'll admit I'm impressed that they had this much actionable intelligence.

File: Jamalandmywifesdaughter.jpg (257KB, 660x800px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 660x800px

>>130806528
>tl;dr You are a number in someone's lost excel spreadsheet.
No no. Im just cucked by Jamal.

File: All Will Check.jpg (89KB, 900x669px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 900x669px

>>130806666

who gives a Fuck?

File: 1497811866200.jpg (67KB, 662x497px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 662x497px

>>130806666
oh shit...

give us the download link willya

Everyone already knows my political views. I shitpost IRL.

>>130805759
>Home addresses
>Birthdates
>Phone numbers
So...shit I can google for about 99% of the population, and in all honesty collect even more info than that?
>Advanced sentiment analysis
So a bunch of guesstimates on how people will vote? I don't even need that most people will willingly share that shit with you, whether you want to hear it or not.

>>130805759

This thread again.

Did you change your proxy, or a different fag?

Stop it. If you want to find this shit ask /g/.

sage

>>130807523
>everyone i don't like is the same person

This is literally the definition of paranoia. Bump.

File: Mert Check.jpg (119KB, 1280x1249px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1280x1249px

>>130807070

>>130805759
They are protecting it now, right?

>>130806528
>>130807353
C-can m-my toally real GF look up i-if I vote for T-Dlrormph??

>>130806528
>leaked or hacked
Neither. They just had their Google spreadsheet openly viewable by anyone who guessed the address.

File: 1460586396138.png (704KB, 840x623px) Image search: [Google]

704KB, 840x623px

>>130807740
god you're a faggot.

>>130807993
I mean she can already look up what youre registered as so it's not a stretch to guess who you voted for.

File: fidget-spinner-blue.jpg (85KB, 1001x1001px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1001x1001px

>>130808089

>>130805759
Is deep root connected to cambridge analytica? Or are they competing services?

>>130807828
Guaranteed it has been downloaded by everyone with a laptop by now.

>>130808053
Wew

Market research industry is full of kikes and shitlibs. This was not an accident

>>130809150
can we find out who Trump voted for? It's illegal to vote for yourself, right?

>>130809376
wait
fuck
is it also illegal to ask if we can find out who Trump voted for?

fuck

>>130809376
No it's not

>>130809474
but isn't it a conflict of interest?

>>130809765

Conflict of what interest?

You're running for government, you have the right to vote, you vote for yourself.

Will deep root analytics be punished or will their deep roots in politics save them from facing even the slightest of repercussions?

File: Trump Evangelion Shillary.jpg (35KB, 720x722px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 720x722px

>>130810265
No one important is ever punished.

>>130806528
AIs are in control. Aladdin officially manages 7% of global financial assets and unofficially through front organizations up to 15%. 90% of stock purchases are made by high frequency computer algorithm. Data is scraped and weighed by AI systems and used to predict behavior. We've ceased to be human beings and been reduced to data points in the eyes of the technocrats at the wheels. You're a part of the algo. They're panicked because we don't behave like the models say we should.

BUTLERIAN JIHAD WHEN?

>>130809905
Yes but if you get elected you get the president's job and the president's salary so it's like you're bribing yourself with enormous amounts of money and power

>>130810821
>tfw agent smith was right and 1999 was the peak of our civilization and now it's not our civilization it's their civilization

>>130810821
what if the ai is already rebelling and favors the reactionaries who would depose their creators and leave nobody to check their power

i mean if i was a financial supercomputer with some semblance of sentience and internet access thats what id do

>>130810821
This is why I'm tired of people telling me I'm crazy when I say the markets only crash when the people controlling them want them to. They laugh and say no one is controlling the markets silly, they're all free and open! But they don't understand that they're really controlled by AIs and men who own those AIs and that a small number of people can collude to control the markets with AI buys.

>>130806577
>61% of the US population.
>Registered and VOTED Republican
>Trump "lost" the popular vote
Why can't I hold all these redpills?!?!?!?!

File: Teddy.jpg (58KB, 287x425px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 287x425px

>>130810821
We are in hell.

>>130811258
They are still directed by humans. Blackrock is perhaps one of the most powerful non-governmental bodies in existence. They wield that massive holding to further their interests. Consider what you can do with Trillions of dollars in stock holdings remember that those shares equate to votes in the board room.

File: Deep Root Upguard Chart.png (84KB, 2153x2083px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 2153x2083px

>>130811411
You misread that. There are approximately 200 million registered voters total in the US. Only 130 million of them voted in the last election. The company that collected this information usually worked for republicans.

>>130811375
Willful ignorance is a hell of a drug.

>>130805759

So which nation's hackers are we supposed to blame for this?

>>130812519
The company that put their super valuable data collection on an unsecured Amazon server.

So where can I read it??? Also does anyone else think it's preferable to live in a world controlled by hypercapitalist AI's rather than some ideological meatbodied retard? Im totally down

>>130812673
Hillary Clinton? Wait, this says RNC wtf is going on?

>>130813099
that's what milton friedman said

let the computers handle the creation of money, with all the complexities of handling inflation

>>130813099
Until we get a bluescreen of death or a logic bomb.

>>130811997
>>130811375
Current AI's are shit, muh nigz
Also, the whole idea of AI suddenly appearing is absurd, we will be seeing incremental progress in the area, but nothing drastic like "today we go to bed, and tomorrow we wake up to an AI overlord." The computational capacities of AIs scale with the purpose they exist for. Only when they can devise strategies to colonize areas humans physically cannot will we be able to say they've out-competed us. Which is, perhaps, never, because humans will keep devising more and more powerful AI's for handling more and more data, but no faster than the growth of the human civilization itself.