Mark Latham (Australian Politician) interviews Jordan Peterson and asks him about Pepe and Memes.
https://youtu.be/izdGWAHjGyM?t=1h7m35s
Starts at 1:07:35
jordan peterson is a hack, has never said anything original or even meaningful. he rode on the anti-SJW bandwagon and now nets a shitload of $ on patreon from impressionable youtube-tier kekposters, while farming data from his self-authoring suite
the dude is not an expert on politics, theology, mythology or even self-improvement and I would like for him to become irrelevant again
>>130790943
did he fuck your wife or something.
>>130791024
im just sick of seeing him being shilled so often when he provides nothing of actual value
>>130791220
>profound insight into a number of interesting subjects
>nothing of actual value
Yeah ok brah.
>>130791564
he's just mad he makes money on patreon
>>130791564
dude he has no insight
he has a baby-tier understanding of comparative mythology
this raspy-voiced opportunist motherfucker needs to GET OUT
>>130790943
>>130791220
>>130791732
>I DEFY ALL AUTHORITY.jpg
Truly what /pol/ is all about.
>>130790943
Dude has hundreds of hours of lectures on YouTube and you come saying he doesn't have anything original pr meaningful to say? Well then you must have watched and read all of his works to get to that conclusion?
Kys kid
>>130792148
why do you peterson dickriders promote his weak cult-of-personality so much?
>>130792516
he repeats himself all the time
muh dominance hierarchies
muh narratives
muh sort yourself out
muh metaphysics of pepe
>>130792577
I take my comment back. You are simply retarded. I just defended you by saying /pol/ is all about defying authorities, which appealing to is a fallacy, and you call 'us' peterson dickriders.
kys
does latham post here?
>>130792822
I misinterpreted your greentext quote
>>130790943
watch his comments on canadian tv show called the agenda. He didn't jump on the bandwagon. He built the bandwagon.
And he is a hell of a lot smarter than you. being a professor of psychology at harvard and then at university of toronto (canada's harvard) will do that to you.
>>130793333
>being a professor of psychology at harvard and then at university of toronto (canada's harvard) will do that to you.
let's be honest, no it won't
being smart in the first place is what enabled him to be those things
>>130793951
>being smart in the first place is what enabled him to be those things
true. but the statement "will do that to you" exists as a common phrase and the statement "will prove it to you" does not. hence why i used it.
>>130790943
above is obviously an idiot and idiots are persuaded by slogans and common phrases, not precise language.