THIS IS EXACTLY WHY I LITERALLY HATE REPUBLICANS

>>130670407
>insert non answers as to why OP is wrong

Bait thread
Sage goes in options field to any newfags tempted to reply

>>130670407
I personally don't give a fuck about anything you wrote, does that help?

>>130670542

Surprise surprise, an alt-right cuckold tells us the obvious: close-minded buffoon who stays in his safe space.

because islam pushed and pushed and pushed. same thing they did in 638. same thing in the early 700s. same thing in the 1100s and the 1400s and with the ottomans. fuck right off with this 'muh white people' argument. this wouldnt have happened if muslims werent teaching a bronze age political ideology with some religious bullshit mixed in thats practically a socialist dictatorship. see the caliphate. and wherever they go they harass the local population and attempt to force their morals on others. furthermore, not even one stupid muhammaden rat died. an old man had a heart attack. they dnt belong in the west. and if they werent here harassing and attacking this white man wouldnt have done anything. checkmate faggot.

>>130670407
Go read the koran. Obviously, you haven't. In addition research taquiya, halal slaughterhouses, and sharia law. I guarantee if you are an hojnest liberal (yeah right) you will disagree with the core concepts of the last two

>>130670407
>but Islam is responsible for everything ISIS does?
Yes, because for the most part, ISIS follows the genuine doctrines of Islam. ISIS has always existed in one form or another throughout Islamic history. It's always been a violent religion and likely always will be.

>>130670407
Because "white people" isn't an ideology, Islam is.

The white mans bible doesnt say kill everyone, fuck kids and marry your first cousin.

>>130670407
Identity > principles. If being inconsistent brings us closer to an ethnostate, so be it.

>>130671500
Oh, and to add to that, there is no shared doctrine that all white people follow or disproportional amount of violence coming from the white community, so you really can't blame whites for the actions of one guy. They didn't choose to be white, nor can they change that. I personally don't blame Muslims for the actions of one muslim, but terrorists usually act in accordance with Islam.

>>130670407
you're absolutely right, it means all middle easterners are to blame, also the white terrorist is only responding to islamic islamic terrorism which is rampant, unlike the literally one white dude
also all fields

>>130670757
What safe space? This isn't a college campus.

>>130670407

Don't worry. We're going to ship you to syria with the rest of them.

What is the psychological strategy behind /leftypol/ plastering basic bitch democrat arguments over anime characters?

>literally
Shouldn't you be in school right now anon?

>>130670407
We take credit for it and think it's part and parcel of living in a big city. By alienating the white minority you're only going to rile them up and cause more attacks. :^)

>>130670407
>White people have a monolithic ideology that hasn't undergone reformation in its 1400 years of existence

>>130670407
Islam is an ideology, being white isn't. Nice bait thread though.

>>130670407
>Skin colour=Race
>Islam= Ideology

False comparison.

every brown person is a mussie

>>130670407
But I think White People ARE responsible for the Mosque Attack and IT'S DAMN OVERDUE

posting in a bot thread

>>130676722
This. Fucking dumb liberals

>>130670407
>IF YOU CRITICIZE ISLAM, YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERYONE THEY KILL OR RAPE!!!!!!!!!

leftist, ladies and gentlemen.

>>130670407
Dumbwit leftist.

>>130670757
The level of context denial in which you are engaging is staggering. I for one don't particularly care that one incidence of civilian violence against an invasive population occurred. It disturbs me infinitely more that it has become so common place for the invading population to commit acts of violence against native civilians who should be valued more within their own country than foreigners. These people can retreat back to their country if they do not like resistance against their invasion and subversion of our homelands. If the white population is displaced from their homelands by people who have no heritage in these lands and no connection to them, as well as next to no economic utility within them, where do you suggest the whites who previously made up the majority of their homelands be displaced to?

>>130670407
Yes, fucking really.

If white man is doing London Mosque attack, wite people will apprehend and judge him according to secular laws.

When durka blows up, muslims will either autistically screech "he dindu nuffin", or will go to with #not all muslims.

No one. I repeat, NO ONE WILL DO SHIT to stop said faggot. Because, by sharia law, he is doing a good thing - killing infidels.
No one will report the imam who calls for killing of infidels.
No one will report the durka who rapes children or beats his wife.
No one will do anything because the people who do, like that poor bastard who wished happy easter, get knifed by durka for offending the Allah.

Now piss off and die, you fucking burger. Libshits like you are cancer.

>>130670407
>hur dur principle vs. Group interests

We have no principles kike only a final solution.

>>130670407
Probably white people are responsible for the the London mosque attack. So what I will always be white. You can change your religion. I wouldn't change my race even if I could.

>>130670407
Assuming you're a legit idiot and not a shitposter...
>white people are a race
>islam is an ideology

You're comparing apples and oranges. The underlying logic of 'white people are not responsible for the london mosque attack' is that since white is a race and is something you're born with. It is a physical attribute which does not cause whites to behave in one way or another.

However, Islam is a religion, and thus an ideology. An ideology is not something you're born with, but must be adopted. And an ideology has an influence on behavior. And when the ideology contains within it core concepts like saying that the followers of the ideology are innately superior to non-followers, then yes, it is responsible for violence caused by followers of that ideology.

If you wanted to make a better comparison that's not so easily refuted, you would say that white supremacy is responsible for the London Mosque attack. Because that would be an ideology and thus comparable.

BUT! I can't say I disapprove of images like that. Most whites who view it are innately aware of the fallacy behind it, even if they are unable to articulate exactly why. This will cause them to feel they are being treated unfairly and being pushed into a corner (which they are) which will further galvanize them to radical and violent actions.

You see, things like this don't really serve your cause. Sure, maybe you derive a little bit of "oh look at me I'm so clever," but you're sacrificing the long game for a temporary spurt of pleasure. They don't 'prove' you right and all they do is accelerate the process by which the West is destroying itself. But you people will never understand this, of course.

File: islam hate speech.jpg (134KB, 620x465px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 620x465px

>>130670407
wow, what embarrasingly bad bate

>>130670407

Not all white supremacists want to kill people. If you label all Nazis as vicious thugs, they're going to resort to terrorism.
#notallwhitesupremacists

File: 1390419564060.jpg (8KB, 220x294px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 220x294px

>>130670407
>Comparing a race to an ideology

>COMPARING A RACE
>TO AN IDEOLOGY

>>130670407

eye for an eye