here is a redpill for all ancap lovers:
imagine an economy in which every actor applies some accounting standard. every actor has to keep its expenses lower than its earnings. the profit of one actor is the loss of another. there fore its a zero sum "game".
this basically also applies to our current system, except that private persons and the public sector does not apply accounting rules.
the redpill is: private companies mostly only make profits because of public debt. this especially applies to our western economies, in which growth potential became very limited and are limited to technologial advance.
----
the second redpill is:
france forced germany into the euro in exchange for the reunification of germany. france feared the united germamy might get too strong again and therefore forced germany into the euro. Germany didnt have any motives giving up the strong Deutsche Mark for some weak ass european currency.
french politicans and journalists wrote and said stuff like:
"maastricht treaty is todays treaty of versailles - it forced germany to pay"
even in year one, 1999, we paid 55 Billion euro.
next time when you say germoney is exploiting europe, thinks again. plus: not having exchange rates to vary means, that the only factor that can increase a countries competitiveness is cutting loan expenses.
meaning we all lost.
come on, i know this is not coninient. the solution is another money system
>>130563091
who is this semen demon?
>>130563536
Sophie Turner from Game of Thrones
Now go back to archiving links
>all goods and services must be compensated for with a third party exchange system
Fucking Jews will try no matter what. Suck my uncut throbbing member Chaim Goldberg, I will trade with whatever I damn well please. If I want to barter directly, there isn't a damn thing you can do about it in a real libertaryan society.
>>130564101
yaeh sure that would work on a local level with everyone self employed and self sustaining.
i would love that system. that way i would knew why to get up in the morning
>>130564101
For example, let's say I have a farm with chickens. I have lots of eggs, but I want my house to be bigger. My neighbor cuts wood, but he doesn't have a lot of food. I trade my excess eggs for his excess wood, he is happy, I'm happy, AND THERE WAS NO FUCKING NEED FOR US TO UNTILIZE EARLY PAYOUTS FROM OUR ROTH IRA'S WHILE TAKING A 15% PENALTY UNLESS WE WANTED A SECOND MORTAGE WITH YOUR FUCKING JEW BANKING SCHEMES
AND IT JUST MAKES YOUR FUCKING BLOOD BOIL DOESNT IT THAT WE DIDNT USE YOUR IMAGINARY FUNNY MONEY THAT YOU MAGICALLY PULL FROM SATANS PROSTATE GLAND SO YOU DONT GET YOUR CUT
Well fuck you, fuck the fed, you can't make me do shit
>france forced germany
Really activates the almonds
>>130561514
>the profit of one actor is the loss of another.
This is where you're wrong.
In order for me to want to buy the product, I must value the product more than I value the currency it costs.
In order for them to want to sell the item, they must value the money more than the product.
Both parties profit because value is subjective