why don't we abolish copyright laws?

Then why would people invent anything new?

The basic idea behind copywrite law is to promote inventions: Invent something, you have the copywrite, make money for a few years, copywrite eventually lapses, you dont care cause you've made the money.

If there was no copywrite law, what is to stop you inventing something then Chinese companies pumping out billions of cheap knockoffs?

They favor the jews. Einstein was a certified dipshit but he stole all the patents that came into his office.

>>130559209
from some dipshit off the internet right?

>>130559264
>his tribe was insulted

>>130559163
I'd like to add the word "legally" after knockoffs.

Nothing could stop them pumping out billions of cheap knockoffs, but at least with copywrite laws it's not legal.

>>130559163
cheap knockoffs are shit

>>130559358
>Then why would people invent anything new?
We could pay them for their contribution, like we already do with government-funded research.

Why would someone spend millions to make movies and games if no one was going to buy it?

Making it legal means you could have safer websites on the internet to download that stuff. Latest things would be easier to find and so on.

>>130559857
Who decides the contribution amount?

Does Gary who invented a cure for HIV get the same contribution money from the Government as Alice who invented a hair dryer which wipes your arse at the same time?

Is this judging panel susceptible to corruption? Alice could promise to suck all their dicks for £1,000,000 more in contributions to the Dry&Wipe fund.

>>130561030
Gary gets a better job as a researcher, Alice gets a pat on the head and a warm fuzzy feeling,

File: 1495723579613.jpg (43KB, 393x395px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 393x395px

textless posts are allowed
oregano