So now the fashion industry is racist

>>130543523
Economics son poor people can't buy expensive clothes. Poor people can only afford poorly cut cotton rags poorly stitched together made in bulk off the rack.

>>130543523
How does Vice News receive enough funding to stay afloat? Do Liberals actually bother to read their shit?

communist propaganda is off the rails nowadays

>>130543763
Yes they get a shit ton of views for their actual news articles, I have even in ironically read some and agreed with the opinions put forward. On the other hand their sjw virtue signalling bs is a majority of what they produce because the left gobbles it up. It is the state of modern journalism, legitimate journalists must work with these sjw speaker box organisations to get their story out.

Disregarding any news because of the organisation that produced it is stupid, (((you))) should form your own opinion only after reviewing the article yourself.

>>130543763

Rupert Murdoch owns Vice, HBO gave them millions, they have an Ad Agency, bought i-D Magazine as well.
Shitloads of revenue

discriminate against the poor?

Well if selling a really expensive product is discrimination against the poor. that could be said about tons of expensive products