Wikipedia removed "sexual abuse" from the mk ultra Wikipedia

>>130497167
Thank you we need eyes on this. This is the memory hole. Archive of edit:

>archive.is/5m4VD

>>130496796
Mk ultra is being used in the Hollywood / Music Industry as well

>>130496796
Bump

You'll need to find a secondary sources discussing sexual abuse in mkultra from a reliable source. Your best bet is to find some magazines it papers discussing it and using language like "some have speculated that sexual abuse was involved." If you push too hard and several ip users or new editors show up pushing hard you'll get shut down.

>>130500376
Why is that better than FOIA documents direct from the CIA?

http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/features/stranger-things-inside-shows-real-life-cia-inspirations-w432945
That would probably let you get it into the article as "conspiracy theorists often believe that sexual abuse was part of the mkultra programming." Or some other language like that. Also gives a source to mention monarch.

>>130500626
Because that's how Wikipedia works. You needed to find a reliable source discussing the foia documents.

Right Wing Wikipedia Squads when?

>>130496796

I want to know : how did you notice about a few words being changed in one of the millions of articles Wikipedia has ?

>>130501384
Good luck. Administrators have quit over the left wing bias both in articles and discipline.

Another source for mentioning sexual abuse and trauma cribbed with conspiracy theory language. http://torontoist.com/2013/10/roseanne-barr-talks-mind-control-and-marijuana-at-conspiracy-culture-event/

>>130496796
>en.m.wikipedia
>.m

kys phone poster

https://books.google.com/books?id=-0wFZRWKdfoC&printsec=frontcover&dq=cathy+o%27brien+mk+ultra&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjriuP-p8nUAhVC4iYKHeGHC70Q6AEIMjAE. Page 76 of that book as well, but again only for saying it's a common conspiracy theory.

>>130501414
This article is a nuke redpill. Changing this softens is dramatically. I was showing my brother the page and noticed instantly. Whether or not our government literally raped people matters

>>130501695
It's a tablet bro, let's stick to talking about the Cia dosing people with acid and then raping and torturing them please rather than cheap D&C shilling

File: kennedy.png (97KB, 586x594px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 586x594px

>>130501206
>if the jews (reliable sources) don't want it on wikipedia, they just never mention it

:^)

>>130502371
Exactly. Not saying it's good, but that's how it is. The system set up on Wikipedia will fight back hard if you don't play by their rules, then you end up with a dozen liberal Jews watching the article and having it locked down from ip or new account editing. Gotta play their game if you want it to stick.

>>130502564
>>130501125
Would this rolling Stone article combined with cathy Obriens book and the FOIA documents be enough?

>>130502970
To mention it in the theories section where the Cathy O'Brien stuff already is definitely

>>130501206

You mean an article about it from the washington post, New York Times, Daily Kos, and other shithole rags not to be trusted.

Wikipedia sucks. Read the talk pages whenever anything gets topical. Awesome to see people shuffle the truth under the rug. Look up stuff like the Syrian conflict, or Cultural Marxism and see the talk pages.

>>130502564

Check out the franklin credit union scandal on wikipedia. That shit is watched like a hawk, and all reliable sources of info into the OBVIOUS human compromise/human trafficking/pedophilia is automatically deleted. MONGO is his name. The fucker even has a thread on encyclopedia dramatica.

>>130504275
I'm fully aware. One of my main time wasters at work is reading the notice boards and arbitration pages. Check the talk page for philosophia and lol at the academic journal autists crushing the feminists.

>>130496796
>wanttoknow.info

lel

>>130504477
same for frankfurt school

>>130505523
based on a FOIA document. Nice try Levy Shekelstein

Guys I'm feeling sleepy all of a sudden. I think I'm going to take a nap.