MEME-CAPS WILL DEFEND THIS

>>130471016
Nope. It'll just be Capitalism with a welfare state. There is no such thing as Left-Wing Anarchy because it requires enforcement.
Sage.

File: IMG_2295.jpg (76KB, 1024x778px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1024x778px

>>130471016
Anarcho-syndicalism is for faggots with no talent who naively think successful people will want to share their shit with talentless twats like you. Kill yourself

>>130475014
They will have to if they want to continue to have capital be worth anything at all.

Without capital being distributed to the producers of goods, those goods will no longer be able to be consumed. It will be beneficial for them as it is for us.

Anarcho-anything is meme

>>130471016
Strawmen and half truths everywhere

File: apps.jpg (447KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

447KB, 1920x1080px

As the tax paying public gains more knowledge about how their taxes are spent they will demand greater efficiency, choices, effectiveness, etc.

The libtards will fight tooth and nail against it.

>>130476265
My god you're retarded. I meant their money, and it's consumers who buy shit, they don't have to be producers. You have nothing to offer anyone, all this "exploitation" bullshit is projection

>>130478044
You literally don't even know what I'm talking about.

Exploitation? What the fuck?

I'm talking about how industry will probably syndicalize under automation, a union of how to distribute capital somehow amongst themselves, so that goods being produced, by things that earn no capital and thus spend none, so that those produced goods may be consumed.

If the production of goods yields no capital to the producers, who is going to buy the product? Capitalism has a fault error under heavy automation.

>>130471016
>Abstinence : free
Abstinence is free, while the option, sex education and public contraception require massive state funding
That pic btfos itself

>>130471016
>the government sets the price of commodities

how does that law look like? an infinite number of "x product shall be priced between XXX and XXX dollars"?

>airline A charges a landing fee
>airline B doesn't
>people use airline B
>airline A goes out of business

>>130481107
Literally not even part of the discussion, does anyone here actually know actual academic political philosophy or is it really just a bunch of retarded memers?

And this is coming from someone who has been here years.