More people have died of hunger under capitalism.

It wasn't real capitalism

>>130452238
fpbp
/thread

>>130452238
fpbp

>>130451389
That's because their government wasn't actively trying to kill them, so they had time to die of something else.

>>130451389
Bangledesh, ethiopia, somalia are either socialist or soviet allies

>>130452238
This, clearly.

Always makes me chuckle when /pol/ folk suddenly become hyper-liberal humanitarians when talking about communism. Won't somebody please think of the children?! 100 billion people starved under Stalin, isn't it awful?!?! Fuck off you hypocritical cunts.

And yes obviously capitalism is responsible for far more deaths. The double standards on this topic on /pol/ are as severe as any of the bullshit you see from SJWs.

>>130451389
Most of those are famines in some third world shitholes. AKA: >>130452238

>>130451389
>all of those third world shit holes
They would've died without Capitalism either way. Also, have 100+ million people died from Capitalism?

>>130452722
This is bait. /pol/ wants to kill the murderers, rapists, and the degenerate. Those who would prevent a perfect society.

How many died of hunger under Communism? Holodomor?

File: hqdefault.jpg (30KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 480x360px

>>130451389
First, you have no significance test, looking at averages tells you nothing.

Next, your groups are not equal sample size, and don't pass the homogeneity of variances. You need a test robust against both. Try to put the data into two categories then conduct a Welches t-test. If there is a significant difference then you can start making claims.

You would also want to control for famines caused by natural disasters, which is several of these on the list. Then you need a solid definition of capitalism, you list several dictatorships in here that had command economies, such as China and India.

Your analysis is bad and you should feel bad.

>if it's not communism it's capitalism
Kill yourself

File: LibertyOrDeath.jpg (127KB, 564x751px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 564x751px

>>130453631

> You would also want to control for famines caused by natural disasters, which is several of these on the list. Then you need a solid definition of capitalism...

That's just it, commies will never acknowledge the fact that capitalism is objectively and explicitly definable starting from the first principle of self ownership. If they did then they wouldn't be able to make the kind of vague bullshit arguments like OP is making in the first place.

Communism on the other hand is not explicitly definable because it's built on an inevitably arbitrary distinction between private and "personal" property.

>>130451389
More people have died in this dimension compared to the perfect dimension.
>unplug the matrix

>>130451389
>most people who complain others having more are jelly, lazy buffoons who feel entitled to everything just because they were born

File: 1494025979657.jpg (100KB, 498x460px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 498x460px

>>130453668
was just about to comment that then saw you did

File: thinking.gif (504KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

504KB, 1080x1080px

>>130451389
Communism has only been tried a couple times compared to other economic systems. If I invented and ideology right now that involved the government purposely killing all of it's citizens and implemented it in a few countries my ideology would still look "good" on this chart by virtue of being so rare.

>>130460709
Yes? I think you are misinterpreting the purpose of OP's meme

>>130462445
What is the purpose? If the purpose is just to show more have died in non communist countries overall I think my post explains why this is true, yet pointless and useless to discuss.

>>130451389
>implying that deaths never occur under socialism