What are opinions on strasserism, the SA, and social-nationalism? Or being more third position rather than corporatist
Should nationalism be anti bourgeois because of globalization and neoliberalism?
>>130421931
"There is no license any more, no private sphere where the individual belongs to himself. That is socialism, not such trivial matters as the possibility of privately owning the means of production. Such things mean nothing if I subject people to a kind of discipline they can't escape...What need have we to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings"
Capitalism is useful if it's useful. Don't be an ideologue.
>>130421931
>Should nationalism be anti bourgeois because of globalization and neoliberalism?
Yes, the nation cannot exist under capitalism. The economic system will always end up eating the nation.
>marxist socialism
You still can keep capitalism in line with the state(nation) interests whitout failing for the "seize the memes of production" meme
>>130421931
Why not just go full communist
>>130425109
Because we have to synthesize the left and the right to destroy liberalism.
>>130422888
You inevitably have a dispossessed majority of the race controlled by a minority of capitalists in bed with the state, which together propel globalization and the bourgeois open society with all of its atomization, cosmopolitanism, plutocracy and gutting of social services.
>>130425109
Too materialist to have any use for intangible notions of family, nation, race, and tradition. Also it's internationalist and based on common ownership, whereas the third position respects private property but desires a larger, petit bourgeois middle class
>>130425373
Exactly. The red pill is proposing a race and class based synthesis to a race and class based problem in stratified liberal capitalist open societies.
This should be done with a SA-like organization that replaces the regular army, providing a popular-revolutionary vehicle, something to train and socialize young men, and ultimately guard private property and middle class communities under conditions agreed upon between classes from social cannibals and degenerates (a new state)
>>130424827
I never said seize the means of production, but we can target the heights of capital and its crony relationship with the state, urban cosmopolitanism/materialism, media, and education. All of which are opposed to the nativist working class and excessively liberal