Yes or no? Why?
>>130394243
No
here's why.
>>130394526
So you think it is ineffectual at preventing crime? Do you think there would be a difference in crime rate if surveillance was either reduced or increased?
Yea cus itll make me more wealthy..
No cus people deserve some privacy even in public.
>>130396963
>So you think it is ineffectual at preventing crime?
that's not it's purpose.
>>130397741
>that's not it's purpose.
it's to find little white girls who need "Enrichment"
>>130394243
Big Brother is always watching
Yes, only for public officials - politicians, judges, police, teachers, military, news media.
Why? LoL
>>130394243
surveillance always seems to be missing when some truck or car travels over a bridge in London and kills a bunch of people, but you are on 19 different high res cameras if you run the red light. It is a bug mystery