Projectile spotted

>yfw Alex Jones was right

>>130382579
Thats a nice shoop

>>130382754

yeah i really took the time to shop that in...

https://youtu.be/P1ULjJ3EqyY?t=10m40s

start at 10:40

just nevermind this thread who cares xD let's talk about alt right LOL

>>130382579
>when you get a lousy cubical assignment

>>130382855
Is that the only footage of such angle?

>>130382855
>i-its not a shop!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dV6rQCWNIVY

>>130383092

that i can find, how it is in this guys video? not sure. i'd have to ask him.

>>130383253

i didn't make the video

File: 9_11_CGI_plane_2.webm (3MB, 712x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 712x480px

Need more 911 evidences

File: wtc_then_now_engine.jpg (73KB, 620x465px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 620x465px

>>130382579
Are you talking about the plane engine that landed in Murray street?

what's the run down on this? surely debris can turn in to projectile when a jet slams in to a building.

>>130383543
That engine is not on the airplanes. It's a plant.

Israel attacked the USA on 9/11, The proof: https://youtu.be/kyLyGXQUIo0?t=3m23s Just google it!

File: sam hyde.jpg (102KB, 600x423px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 600x423px

>>130382579
what about this ID that was found near the building.

>projectile spotted


Its just the passport that belongs to the terrorist

>>130383543

hmmm havent seen this before

>>130383543
How do you know it landed in Murray street, did it knock the street sign down or some other coincidence?

File: tower2.png (45KB, 1024x1055px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1024x1055px

>>130383779

how does he keep getting away with it?

File: ENGINE-MONTAGE-1-new.jpg (257KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 650x650px

>>130383771
That engine is in fact the best evidence the planes that hit the towers were not the flights we have been told they were. The parts don't fit the engine models they should.
It was not planted. Or they'd plant the right kind.

>>130383934
So something was wrong though. How could they possibly not know what planes hit the tower?

>>130383771
>Israel attacked the USA on 9/11
Hey there Akmed.

>>130382579
>a 480x270 gif of the event reviewed in 2017 is going to suddenly blow the 9/11 case wide open
Are your parents proud of what you're doing with your life?

>>130384052

there was different reports of people seeing like grey military type jets, not commercial

File: 6586-large.jpg (40KB, 420x415px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 420x415px

>>130383851
I know it landed there because of all the video and photographic evidence. Besides hitting the pole, it also hit the top of the 45 park palace building.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhqZQqQdjyk

>>130382579
It's just a scared bird, go back to sleep anon.

>>130384427
And that's the point. If that engine doesn't belong to the type of plane that is said to have hit the tower that can only mean one of two things.
Either it was planted there.
Or a different type of plane hit the tower.

>>130384796
It could not be planted because there is enough evidence it landed there. So I'll go with the other option. The planes could have been decoys remotely controlled.

>>130383934
Those are two different parts retard.
>cooling duct
>cooling duct assembly

>>130385469
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPO3TqQyZsU

>>130383543
thats a plant, nice try

>>130386800
That's literally the same picture in video form.

The cooling duct and the cooling duct assembly are different parts. That is why they have different names.
The JT9D-7 and the JT9D-7R4D share the same cooling duct assembly part. They share a lot of parts. They are, in fact, from the same family of engine.

This is why you shouldn't mouth off on shit you know nothing about.

>>130382579
America knows the 9/11 myth is bullshit.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=solving+9%2F11+ends+the+war

It's probably just James, the window washer.

File: hqdedffault.jpg (19KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 480x360px

>>130382579

>>130384928

yup

File: 1494134046231.webm (2MB, 550x310px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 550x310px

Daily reminder that CGI planes theory is a dead end and it always derails (intentionally or not) all '911 inside job' discussions.

>>130384928
>The planes could have been decoys remotely controlled.
The plains were remotly cotroled.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIdhoc0PRr8
March 2001