Thread replies: 24
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
File: 1497663666919s.jpg (2KB, 86x125px) Image search:
[Google]
2KB, 86x125px
I need to make the argument concise.
Man-made climate change is occurring because:
>"Global temperatures" have risen ~2Celsius since 1900
>100 years is enough to gauge climate trend
>CO2 levels are rising
>CO2 is emitted by burning fossil fuels and it's conversion to O2 is slowed by deforestation
>CO2 rising is associated with rising global temperatures based on Greenland ice data
>We can measure how much CO2 has been emitted in the last ~150 years (how much is it?)
>That amount is enough to explain the temperature change over the 100 year period (by which statement of model?)
>"Look at Venus!"
Man-made climate change is NOT occurring because:
>100 years is nowhere near enough time to gauge climate trend (correlation between change in temp from lagging 100 years to following?)
>CO2 levels are not shown be increasing for primarily man-made factors
>CO2 and global temperatures have been much higher in the past
what am I missing?
with all the money, talk and bullshit to this issue it doesn't appear to me there should even be a debate with such answerable questions.
>>
>>130361140
CO2 isn't even important, look a methane levels which are mostly from natural gas and factory farms
>>
Can we talk about sauce OP?
>>
>>130361140
CO2 isn't even important. Look at 99% of the life in the Pacific which is all dying. Israeli security firm did 9/11
>>
>>130361230
>>130361379
Hivemi-
what?
>>
>>130361230
>>130361379
>while methane warms the earth 20 times faster than CO2, it's levels are 1/200 those of CO2 in the atmosphere
so a %change in methane should be about 10% as important as a %change in CO2 atmospheric ppm levels...
>>
>>130361286
Denise Milani, I'd recognize those tits anywhere
>>
Venus is a stupid argument. Totally different planetary history, different position in relation to this huge fireball thing that somehow influences our weather and temperature. Hey! Maybe that thing fluctuates in intensity or whatever.
>>
File: full_retard.jpg (29KB, 620x363px) Image search:
[Google]
29KB, 620x363px
>>130361140
>posts that thumbnail
>doesn't blow up into full size hi res photo when clicked
Fuck you OP you god damned pile of worthless shit.
>>
File: 1497663666919.jpg (823KB, 2768x4000px) Image search:
[Google]
823KB, 2768x4000px
>>130361140
>>130363124
that was an honest mistake
>>
File: atkins.jpg (58KB, 451x604px) Image search:
[Google]
58KB, 451x604px
>>130363529
You're a legend. All is forgiven.
>>
>>130363529
(You) were an honest mistake.
>>
>>130361140
GW is 90% the heat island effect that is expanding as rural sensors become city.
All of the GW solutions make Jews rich or powerful.
>>
File: Bastiat.jpg (42KB, 396x512px) Image search:
[Google]
42KB, 396x512px
>>130361140
Stop boring me with your religious bullshit, anon.
t. Science fag who was advised to find any specious link between reserach and CO2 emissions to guarantee funding.
>>
>>130366544
>religious bullshit
wat?
>>
>>130361140
>>"Global temperatures" have risen ~2Celsius since 1900
That statement is false
>Averaged over all land and ocean surfaces, temperatures warmed roughly 1.53 degrees Fahrenheit (0.85 degrees Celsius) from 1880 to 2012
https://www2.ucar.edu/climate/faq/how-much-has-global-temperature-risen-last-100-years
Before you have this conversation, you need to source the bullshit you're claiming to be fact.
>>
>>130361140
>2kb image of Denise Milani
No we cannot
>>
>>130362228
Thats why I love this place
>>
If it was real, they would stop all commercial planes.
>Opening flightradar24
>Seeing hundreds of shekel airlines everywhere
fy OP, geoengineering is real, and a fraud to our health.
>>
Reducing carbon in the atmosphere is trivially difficult and can be done to make a profit. Fuck's sake, /pol/, we teach the carbon cycle to 10 year olds. Even Americans learn the chemistry needed to sequester billions of tons of carbon by age 15, and the biochem needed to sequester that same carbon while making boatloads of money is learned in an intro to biochemistry course in college.
>>
>>130361140
https://youtu.be/YQshyqCLYHo
here
>>
>>130366168
Is this the same effect that is reducing the ice mass in Greenland or making the oceans more acidic? Or is that the effect that increases CO2 concentration? Is the Texas sized melt lake in Antarctica a heat island?
>>
>>130367323
I'm not taking sides, I'm viewing the arguments. That 2C stat is pretty much the only stat in the bunch, the rest are common prose by now
>>
>>130363733
2thicc4me
Thread posts: 24
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5