Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: smoking pepe.png (218KB, 600x579px) Image search:
[Google]
218KB, 600x579px
one thing I typically see on /pol/ is people in the middle of debates and the thread gets archived before their able to send the post (for some reason). I typically have to do a lot of research and sourcing while debating because of the desire of coherence, but research typically takes a little while. My question is this, do you think people should be able to reply to a thread after the thread is archived? and if so how? if not, why?
>>
File: IMG_9613.jpg (93KB, 680x680px) Image search:
[Google]
93KB, 680x680px
>>130351821
>kekistani
>>
>>130351821
bump it while you're researching
>>
File: nazipepe.jpg (158KB, 620x620px) Image search:
[Google]
158KB, 620x620px
>>130352001
do you ignore anything kekistani no matter how reasonable or unreasonable the opinion may be? and on the topic, I only provided an oped door to discourse, not stated an opinion. How does it feel, anon, to know that your reply is completely unrelated to the thread? does your ignorance to certain people give you a sense in security?
>>
>>130352910
bump
Thread posts: 5
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3