/pol/ only ever talks about cultural marxism.
How can you call yourself redpilled if you never discuss cultural leninism, cultural stalinism and cultural trotskyism?
>>130328394
/pol/ism cultural
>>130328394
>believing those actually exist
I never really understood, what exactly do you fags believe "Cultural Marxism" is and how the fuck does it relate to Marx or anything ?
>>130328394
Cultural Marxism is a crock of shit. The Frankfurt School were EXPLICITLY AGAINST PROPAGANDA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_industry
>>130328394
>>130330381
There is LITERALLY VIDEO of them warning that leftists can become regressives:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=al3aOuqpVbs
>>130330187
Marxism initially meant that the workers would unite and overthrow the capitalist regime to install a socialist utopia.
After WW2, leftist thinkers realized this was not gonna happen in Western Europe, mostly because the governments "made a deal" so to speak with the unions and other social organizations/civil society to better the conditions for the poor through the welfare state (or just greater state involvement in general). So the marxist intellectuals had to come up with a new strategy to overthrow the still somewhat capitalist regimes. If they lost the battle in economics, they would turn to different fields. This is where cultural marxism enters the game.
It's late here and I'm not in the mood to type out a dozen posts about the frankfurt school, postmodernism and all that shit. There's plenty of info about this on the internet already.
"cultural marxism" is a redundant term, like "atm machine"
>>130328394
>https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/63duj5/how_do_you_respond_to_believers_of_cultural/dftdl03/
>inb4 "reddit link derp derp derp"
>>130330709
Nice blue balls inducing post, I was enjoying that.
>>130330709
>I'm not in the mood to type out a dozen posts about the frankfurt school, postmodernism and all that shit.
I am;
A member of The Frankfurt School is literally the key critic of Post-Modernism:
>https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/postmodernism/#9
Adorno was literally protested by far left-students because HE CALLED THE COPS OF REGRESSIVES!!! (pic related)... he actually calls them "calculating regressives" in link below.
>http://field-journal.com/editorial/theodor-adorno-and-herbert-marcuse-correspondence-on-the-german-student-movement
They were literally against the MSM:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_industry
They literally helped the USA during the Cold War:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Marxism:_A_Critical_Analysis
The Birmingham School Cultural Marxists literally wanted to stop "Cultural Drift" and tabloid media:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Uses_of_Literacy#The_.22drift.22
People who followed in The Frankfurt School's traditions were arguing AGAINST identity politics decades ago:
>https://konspektikaust.wordpress.com/2012/10/22/nancy-fraser-rethinking-recognition/
>>130331706
>HE CALLED THE COPS OF REGRESSIVES
On regressives, he called the cops on students which interrupted the learning process:
>"if there is a real threat of physical injury to persons, and of the destruction of material and facilities serving the educational function of the university"
>http://field-journal.com/editorial/theodor-adorno-and-herbert-marcuse-correspondence-on-the-german-student-movement
>>130328394
Again, Adorno warning of "left fascism":
>You object to Jürgen’s expression ‘left fascism’, calling it a contradictio in adjecto. But you are a dialectician, aren’t you? As if such contradictions did not exist—might not a movement, by the force of its immanent antinomies, transform itself into its opposite? I do not doubt for a moment that the student movement in its current form is heading towards that technocratization of the university that it claims it wants to prevent, indeed quite directly. And it also seems to me just as un-questionable that modes of behaviour such as those that I had to witness, and whose description I will spare both you and me, really display something of that thoughtless violence that once belonged to fascism
>>130330381
>>130330646
>>130331706
>>130331852
>>130332277
That's enough Schlomo.
Adorno subjected white Christian children only, excluding blacks, Jews, etc. to so-called fascist tests that he and his Jew buddies spread across the American university campuses after being invited to here during the Wiemar Republic. (cf. the Authoritarian Personality) One of the conditions for being a fascist was seeking the approval of your parents for your spouse, another was wanting to marry a person of the same race.
Adorno and Horkheimer spent their careers railing against Christian traditions, and never once criticized Jewish ones.
Marcuse, another Kike, taught liberals to be "intolerant of intolerance", subverting classical liberals, and creating the Antifa personality as we know it today. (cf. Repressive Tolerance)
I can go on for days. Just because they criticized post-modernism doesn't mean that their the good guys. Every fucking philosopher worth his salt has been doing that for the last 200 years.
We know what you are Schlomo. Your theories of "difference", "authenticity" and "recognition" are all designed for the slave personality, for people living in a world that does not reflect their values, and too weak to make it so.
The goy knows.
"But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one." Luke, 22:36