this triggers the kike

>>130311123
can likes not rotate these in their head is that really a white thing

>>130311123
>>130311449
can i see evidence of this? I'm intrigued

>>130311123
I think that woman had harder time to rotate them in mind.

>>130311123
Phrasing of the question is retarded. Are you comparing the two figures in A? Or comparing figures in A with figures in B to see if both match?

>>130311619
>Phrasing of the question is retarded.
white guy detected. it's a yes-or-no question.

>>130311123
Is there another version of this? I remember having a hard time doing this awhile ago. However today after accepting Jesus Christ as my lord and savior it was very easy to do.

The answer is "no".

>>130311374
That is correct.

>>130311790

kike confirmed

>>130311738
the phrasing confused me too. while i can rotate them in my head, i was only comparing A figures with A and B figures with B. but now i see that if you cross compare A and B figures you get matches

>>130311738
Either of the scenarios I listed can be answered with yes or no.

No, but the furthest-left and furthest-right are identical.

File: aa.jpg (302KB, 1440x810px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1440x810px

>>130311123

>>130311877
>deus vult
>want to take jerusalem, kike land
>follows Christianity, kike religion
wew'd

>>130311543

Yes it's true
Not your personal google. look it up.

>>130311877
>t. Shlomo

>>130311871
no. it's asked within each set.

Guys is it weird that I can get most pattern recognition questions correct, and have the ability to rotate objects in my head, but still shit at maths?

I do A-level maths and even this paki girl has better grades than me, what gives?

>>130311123

Yes. The two middle ones match, as do the two outer ones.

>>130311738
The question is not specific enough as to the problem to be solved.

>>130311374
If pair A and pair B are to be rotated to match, as indicated by your lines, then the answer is yes because I'm not a Jew.

a) no
b) no

>>130312142
jew detected

>>130312367
Brainlet detected.

>>130312262
Spatial is separate from mathmatical intelligence. Math is actually more related to verbal, and jews do well at both of these

Why are there so many great Jewish physicists?

The phrasing clearly fucking means that it wants to know if the figures in the set are identical to each other, and they're not.

>>130312262
You don't think about math spatially. You should try to examine the geometry of the problems and that will help you understand the numeric or algebraic expression of whatever you're doing.

What mathematics are you doing right now?

>>130312487
So how to get better at maths. I keep trying but get stumped on basic questions.

>>130312511
why are there no good jewish minecraft players?

>>130312511

aside from the patent thief, like who?

>>130312600
Calculus and geometry

>>130312026
>because I say so!
go puff your vape somewhere else fedora faggot.

>>130311619
It's comparing the two figures in A, then comparing the two figures in B. Neither of them work.

>>130312614
Keep failing. Retake the class until you get a 4.0, it is the same as learning a language, quite literally.

Practice on khan academy, download algebra, calculus, and trigonometry pdfs and start doing problems.

Math is not a spectator sport as my teacher told me

>>130312619

>Minecraft is a game about building and creating
>Jews can only destroy

Is Minecraft, dare I say, /ourgame/?

>>130312511
Because they research Jewish physics, not real physics.

the two figures in set (a) cannot be made identical by rotating them

the two figures in set (b) cannot be made identical by rotating them

>>130311123
took me a sec to figure out the pairs but it's pretty simple once you understand the question

>>130312711
this

File: frank-gehry-cleveland-clinic.jpg (162KB, 728x527px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 728x527px

>>130311123
>below avg spatial IQ

Explain this!

>>130311123
Yes they can be. I imagined them, rotated them like a rag doll, and they indeed can be rotated to match both sets.

File: disgust.gif (83KB, 395x281px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 395x281px

>>130312970

File: Taurus-Spectrum-factory-photo-00002.jpg (38KB, 700x542px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 700x542px

>>130311123
Can the two figures be made identical by rotating them in space?
The question is about two figures, not two sets.
The "In each set" bit is asking about two different problems. The figures in A cannot and the figures in B cannot. Both sets can be made identical, but each set does not contain 2 identical figures.
pic unrelated

>>130311123
A1 matches B2
A2 matches B1

>>130312970
looks like shit

>>130312724
That's perfect actually. Look at the graphs of your equations and try to understand what they tell you. As for geometry, it's kind of the same way. The only way to get better at proofs and other things is to examine the logic behind them very closely.

Overall though you should just do whatever it is you're struggling in a lot.

>>130311374
>each set
It's two at a time

>>130312970
the picture explains itself

>>130312935
it's also basically autism therapy, so yeah, I'd say its /ourgame/

File: merchant27.png (98KB, 502x410px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 502x410px

>>130311374
>>130311123

>>130311374
You've proven you have a low IQ by not being able to follow directions

Worded weird
If you mean the two figures in a made identical and two figures in b made identical then no

>>130312970
>tfw they actually tried to build a straight wall

File: hannes_alfven.jpg (419KB, 1106x756px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 1106x756px

>>130312511

>Why are there so many "great" Jewish theoretical physicists?

ftfy

>>130313310
no he proved to think outside the box and can probably "out-engineer" you

>>130313093
cute gun

>>130311738

This is a white man's board you dumb nigger, get off my board.

Also, I think his question is legitimately fucking inbred retarded and evidence of your kind. Fuck outta here.

>>130311123
By kike you mean woman

>>130313474
Yeh. I want one.
>inb4 >taurus
They're simple double action carry guns with fun colors, and Taurus is under new management. I wouldn't get one on the first run, but after some reviews come out I'll probably go for it. The overall design is appealing to me, though it's not perfect.

>>130312262
Sucking at math is often due to laziness more than inability. Most basic math (everything up to diff eq) is just rote memorization of cookie-cutter problems. Once you start applying math in science and engineering, that's when the boys are separated from the men. I thought I "sucked at math" in high school, but I never once studied or did homework. When I went to college for engineering I started taking it seriously and found out I'm actually good at math.

>>130312970
This could be a thread in itself.

White man here to mansplain the situation to you retards:

There are two sets, do not compare sets, only compare the two shapes in (a) to each other, then compare the two shapes in (b) to each other. In other words, there are two trials, each trial has two shapes to compare to one another.

It's not hard, you guys are just morons. And the answer is no, they can't be rotated to be exactly alike seeing as how they're mirrored about a two dimensional plane and they are asymmetrical shapes.

This is why white people built the world.

File: ffffffff.png (448KB, 1855x877px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1855x877px

>>130311123
no
read the instructions. part of the test is to read and understand the instruktions

It's always fun to see this kind of threads and how fucking dumb all y'all gnatzis are.

>>130312511
Please tell me you're joking.

>>130313926
but rules are a social construction and by denying them i'm proving that i'm intelligent and creative even though i have no capability to address the question at hand.

>>130314185
kek'd, this.

>>130313947

Says the coward who won't even turn his flag on.

Friendo.

have you guys tried asking the blocks which rotation they identify as?

Verbal and spatial IQs are inversely correlated.

Except among engineers, strangely enough.

>>130314252
but i would say that comparing the pictures out of their sets is actually intelligent. it's always good to think outside the box.

>>130312511
>he still believes in anglo-american-zionist physics
lmao

But if you were to ask if each section is an apartment block you rent out to dirt poor shitskins and the government wants you to do improvements to bring building up to fire code. What amount do you insure the building for and is it cost efficient to burn the motherfucker down rather than make the improvements? And what charity do you start for the fire victims and how much can you skim off the top before you relocate them to another slum building you own?

>>130311123
Depends whether they mean the two figures in A and B separately, or A and B combined.

File: workerWithDownSyndrome.jpg (8KB, 183x276px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 183x276px

>>130312970

File: lookathim.jpg (63KB, 370x463px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 370x463px

>>130315066

>>130311123
I fucking love these. The engineering school that I went to made all
freshmen take a test that was made up of only these types of problems.
If you didn't pass then you had to take a half semester spatial reasoning class. This class was basically filled with like the small
population of niggers that went to the school.

>>130312614
just practice more
especially in this day and age its just rote memorization

File: LaytonIncorrect.png (7KB, 256x192px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 256x192px

Is /pol/ seriously struggeling with this? This is a puzzle on the level of gradeschoolers to test their conception of space.

>>130316522
exactly! and the answers are no and no!

>>130313810
You have a low IQ.

This isn't a trick question, it's an IQ question... so they wouldn't put 2 shapes that are CLEARLY different right next to each other and ask if they are the same.

The point of the question is to rotate the examples in your head and see if they match.

>Can the 2 figures in each set be made identical by rotating them in space.

Let's find out:

Let's take both figures from set (A) and rotate them... yup, after rotating them, it looks exactly like set (B)

Now let's take the 2 figures from set (B) and rotate them... wow, look, they look like set (A) now.

Pretty easy, looks like we've found a kike.

>>130317165
gr8 b8 m8

File: dice.png (8KB, 328x273px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 328x273px

Well lets see if nu-/pol/ really is that retarded or if you posess the slightest form of intelligence

>>130317165
No, its just badly writed

File: IMG_3901.jpg (61KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 600x600px

>>130311123
Are kikes just not able to like picture this in their heads and rotate it? I can do it, but I'm Asian and white, so...

>>130317509
It's written fine. If you take the 2 figures in the sets and rotate them, will they still match? Yes, they will.

>>130311959
>JIDF
Please tell me this is an actual episode.

>>130317482
B.

>>130317165
You have to take both figures in set (a) and rotate them to see if they match. There is no rotation of the two figures in set (a) which makes them match...
>In each set, can the two figures me made identical, by rotating them in space.
Learn to read fucking english you retard

>>130317482
B

>>130317675
>"in the sets"
I think you'll find it says "in each set" you mongoloid

>>130316681
Thanks I hoped so.

Neat technique is to rotate both at the same time instead of trying to make one fit the (static) other.

File: 1479827627871.jpg (31KB, 394x304px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 394x304px

>>130313926
>read and understand the instruktions

>instructions (with c) are not specific enough

File: 1492243997050.jpg (52KB, 780x688px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 780x688px

>>130311123
Obviously yes, it's the same fucking thing backwards. Is this really a challenge for subhumans?

>>130317165
>A rotates to B
>Step 2 time to check if B rotates to A
>calls others retarded

File: Easy Mathematics Picture Puzzle.jpg (15KB, 720x529px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 720x529px

>>130317856
>>130317757
Very good. Next is math

>>130312970
The twisted mind of a kike came up with this impractical design. White architects and engineers spent countless hours tinkering with it, finding materials and developing the internal structure to make it possible.

>>130318131
18?

>>130318131
18

>>130318295

yup

>>130313415
>out-engineer
>doesn't follow instructions
Pick one.

>>130317798
Each
adverb
to, for, or by every one of a group

When they say "each", they mean EVERY ONE IN THE GROUP, you fucking retard,

YOU need to learn English.

If you rotate set A, you get set B. Moron.

>>130317165
>Can the 2 figures in each set be made identical by rotating them in space.
>in each set

>starts by rotating set a to match set b

>>130313310

The directions never stated matching pair to pair.

You implied this on your own, incorrectly.

File: hqdefault.jpg (7KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 480x360px

>>130318295
>>130318384
Correct, you even got the same number if you multiply both number pairs.
Next one comming right up.

>>130312511
lmao kikes r dumb af they psyop u into thinking theyre smart by talking quickly/ballooning minutiae/using words like praxis and -isms to fool u into thinking they have (((verbal intelligence))). they argue for hours because they never really say anything, use non-sequiturs and various fallacies and misdirections to force a more qualified debate opponent to eventually getting frustrated and giving up on making their initial point, making it seem like the kike lies have won out. they get by on shock value, projection and the anticipated guilt/denigration of the goyim reading such as by the multiple heinous lies about holocaust by eLIE weasel and fellow heeb co. they have no grasp on true rhetoric or real literary talent, they cannot use language that is true and resonates with the soul. there is nothing that is verboten or cannot be articulated, if it is true and pure. who said "whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent"? A FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT SUBVERSIVE JEW. tractatus is a piece of shit intended to misdirect and obscure.

despite them becoming (((doctors))) they are also mostly complete losers in science making up rando nebulous theoretical shit like (((dark matter))) and (((black wholes))) and ((quantum physics))) so they can steal money for the jewreasearch and then get the (((nobel))) for literally being a fucking jew making up random dumb fucking space shit to hide the fact that they are ruining the fucking world. all scientific and pharmaceutical innovations are done by the goyim laymen and the patents are then stolen by the jewish owners then sold to israel. look at all the science papers coming out, not one real advancement is ever done by the jews. any advance to cure anything is basically just to (((cure))) a disease they created. lol look at what these kikes do: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/12/26/israeli-drug-company-teva-gets-caught-bribing-russian-ukrainian-and-mexican-officials/

god i fucking hate the jews.

>>130311374
Came here to toast this.

We do these for our military applications.

>>130317963
Look up the word "each", you fucking moron. It's an adverb for "every one in the group", but perhaps I shouldn't have expected you complete fucking retards to know that.

File: logic steps 1.png (151KB, 515x633px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 515x633px

This one will show if you have pattern recognition

>>130311123
No wonder jewish art sucks ass.

>>130311123
The answer is either "no" or, if we're allowed to abstract this,
>>130311374

>>130318610
it says "the two figures in each set" you mong

It's pretty common sense to assume that a) and b) each denote a set

>>130318769
D

>>130311374
The middle two are not alike

>>130318532
That's what "each" means, fucking retard. It's an adverb for "every one in the group"

If you rotate the entire set of A, you get set B.... and that's exactly what the question is asking. Fucking low-IQ retard.

>>130318960

And they can.

Once again A is a set, and B is a set.

The first and the third are not a set.

>>130311123
Set (a) has 2 non-identical elements.
Set (b) has 2 non-identical elements.

The answer is no.

>>130317675
"Can the 2 sets be made identical by rotating each figure in space?" Then that would make sense

>>130318997
Jew detected.

>>130318769
D

>>130311123
not in each set but this works
>>130311374

>>130313050
>.gif
delet this

>>130313093
>Taurus
DELET THIS

>>130311619
Well first, you have to understand the word set.

>>130318769
D, but my reasoning is a little wonky, So if we could get an explanation that'd be nice

>>130318769
d?

>>130317482
B

>>130319576
I got it by looking at the patterns on the circle and marker things.

>>130319576
>>130319283
>>130318990
Obvious bait. There's no correct answer

Kikes argue what they can- language. The figures in set B can be moved in space to be identical to the figures in set A.

>>130319742
Each row has a matching number of the circle design and the marker things if you go with d

>>130319742
Try looking at each rows.
Notice how in each row, the triangle arrangement is different for each image, and so are the fill ins (half black left for 1, half black upper for 2, and white for 3).

Then once you go down to the second row, it's the same as the first.

Once you're in row 3, only D would fit as it's different from the inside (black left fill), and is the only different arrangement which would match for the triangles.

>>130319088
The question is asking each set, not each figure.

Why the fuck would they give 2 separate examples in an IQ question?

And it's not asking to spin, it's asking to rotate....

The point of the fucking question is to rotate set A, and you should be able to decipher if it will look like set B or not.

How fucking dumb is /pol/?

>>130318769
D on the basis on the center circle pattern across diagonal rows

>>130319742
Hence my confusion, but would you care to elaborate?

>>130318756
You may have looked up the definition for the word "each", you may have even read it but you obviously didn't understand it and you certainly didn't apply it to the context of the question.
>american education

File: 1487670766584.jpg (120KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1024x768px

>>130319576
>>130319742
Just outselect criteria for every row, like one blank, one horizontal and one perpendicular

>>130319873
Yeah, but /pol/ is way too fucking stupid to understand that.

File: logic steps 2.jpg (21KB, 628x353px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 628x353px

Alright, next one!

>>130320072
I know exactly what the question means, my IQ is at least 100 points higher than yours.

See>>130320024

>>130311123
Low spacial IQ? Is this why they rely on whites to hunt and explore while they leech off of society?

>>130311123
>>>130311738
>the phrasing confused me too.

Below avg verbal intelligence

T. Jew

>>130311123
A is no

B is yes

>>130318769
The mini triangles piss me off for this one. I don't see the pattern for them.

>>130320166
A

>>130320445
wrong. both are no.

>>130320534
How did you get that? The greyed out triangles are fucking messing with me?

File: 1453944499711.jpg (26KB, 274x321px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 274x321px

>>130320166
b) right?

>>130320166
Is it B?

>>130312367
It's asking to compare each set, a and b.

I l suspect /pol/ really is diverse given the lack of reading comprehension.

>>130320624
The triangles yeah. Look at the direction of the symbols. The triangles move differently, one clockwise by 2 and one counter clockwise by 1.

>>130311123
>>130311374
this is basically a test of character
either
A. you conform and just answer the question with the correct answer which is NO
B. point out how to make the statement true by switching the models from each set to make the answer YES
I really don't have to read all the replies to know which /pol will choose FP made it clear.

>>130320166
B

File: 1476701267333.jpg (33KB, 567x565px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 567x565px

>>130320342

>>130320616
You're right.

>>130320616
It's not "both" question.

It's asking you to rotate set A (or B) and make it look like the other set. The answer is yes. This is one of the easiest questions on an IQ test.

>>130320445
>burger education

File: escher.jpg (375KB, 926x521px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 926x521px

>>130312970
>>130311123
>hint, they have below avg spatial IQ

superior goyim spacial abilities coming trough

protip-spacial IQ is connected to Testosterone, men have higher than wammen

>>130312970
at least its not a historical building having a tumor.
I fucking hate jewish architecture.

>>130320022
>>130319939
>>130320070
The bait part is it's easy to pick D thinking only about the middle part
If you see the ribbon of the row, each row has left black, right black, no black. So the ribbon should be right black, not left black.

File: 9308d11c6cb40c231acd4b02b51b6ef3.jpg (7KB, 236x194px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 236x194px

>>130320534
One darkend field moves three fields while the other two

From the phrasing I got:
Do the two figures in A match each other? Do the two figures in B match each other? The answer is no. But A1 and B2 match each other, and A2 and B1 match each other. So I guess A as a whole and B as a whole match each other, so I guess yes if you're comparing A to B.

>>130320876
The Jews make buildings like that to destroy Western culture and promote a globalist society.

>>130320921
Yeah. You know what I meant.
IQ test are inherently flawed. One can be adept at picking out patterns, while another person is adept at mathemarics.

>>130311374
I can't see how the first and last work. Are you retarded or am I a jew?

File: 1338016228063s.jpg (9KB, 252x179px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 252x179px

Ok, nu-/pol/ seems to be better then expected in solving childrens puzzles

>>130320724
You're just a retard that don't understand a basic IQ question.

Rotate set A to get set B.... how fucking hard is that?

>>130311123

>No

Neither set can be made identical by rotating them in space.

How'd I do, goyim? Am I HONORARY ARYAN?

>>130320166
B

>>130313926
but we're not native english speakers

File: 1485372077006.jpg (180KB, 460x650px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 460x650px

>>130321020
You're right, yet it doesn't hurt to train oneself in such matters for dem brain gains

>>130321107
But it's a tricky question for sure. One would assume the order of a wouldn't be switched on b.

>>130321134
You're a kike. It's asking if set A can be rotated to look like set B.

>>130320855
Just got it wrong after a quick glance. Retard.

>>130318218
this. some stupid jew threw together a concept and said "make me this now", and a bunch of white guys had to collaborate to find a method of creating a structurally sound version of the kike fantasy

>>130320849
oh god

you're serious, aren't you?

>>130320873
>spacial IQ is connected to Testosterone
I noticed this for myself as my T started rising (nofap, better food, weight lifting, etc.)

>>130321171
Certainly. I'm probably dyslexic.

File: 1497723173104.png (490KB, 1855x877px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 1855x877px

>>130321033
these two are the same. you're just a retard

>>130321049
22.

>>130321334
Because successful men hunted well. Natural selection for T behavior and effects.

>>130321253
You're taking both figures at the same time and rotating them..... so set A (both figures at the same time) can be rotated and look like set B, and vice-versa.

>>130321033
you are a jew or retarded

>>130320964
many people laugh at this when I say it, but I think that those people who don't have sense for aesthetical beauty are terrible and have shit personalities.

>>130311123
>hint, they have below avg spatial IQ
They have below average EVERYTHING IQ. They play the same game as China does, manipulating statistics to make it look like they are smarter than they are. Kikes have invented basically nothing. They CLAIM a lot of inventions, but they aren't smart enough to invent jack shit.

File: Goobyzweifelt_boarisch.png (17KB, 200x181px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 200x181px

>>130321049
>older brother
>when Paul was the same age Phil is today

>>130311123
No. Goys have an astoundingly low semantic IQ though.

File: 7290950_114817241675 (1).jpg (57KB, 700x927px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 700x927px

>>130321267

Yes it can.

>>130311123
a) no b) no

>white people desperately trying to cling to some bullshit test for validation

How about you start taking back your culture, morons.

>>130321634
never mind, I can't read

>>130321319
I'm 100% serious.

The question is asking to take both figures in each set and rotate them.

So let's take BOTH figures in set A and rotate them at the same time..

You will get set B. And vice-versa.

>>130320166
b) x moves 1 clockwise, dot moves 1 spot counter clockwise, colored spot between dot and x stops at the 5th spot clockwise, second colored stops on 2nd spot clockwise

>>130317482
B

>>130321766
What the fuck are you?

>>130321107
You can obviously rotate set a to get set b. But that's not what the question asks.
It may well have been the intended solution, but again the question asks for something else.

>>130313742
I don't entirely agree with basic math being about rote memorization. A lot of people have teachers who learned by rote and don't actually know why things work the way they do and that really affects some people when learning math. I used to hear kids saying there was no such thing as 'timsing' outside of class way back in middle school, and these were magnet kids. It was obvious no one ever taught them that multiplication is a calculation of that numbering being repeated that number of times, which is why for instance multiplying by a fraction smaller than one gets you a number smaller than the initial number being multiplied. If kids just learn to follow what seems like otherwise arbitrary rules, it can be harder to remember than if they were taught the principles behind the mechanisms as well.

>>130320654
I narrowed it down to b or d. Can't figure out which one.

>>130320707
wrong.

the disc is rotating, the triangles behave like fan blades travelling at different speeds. assign to them their constant speeds.

>>130321253
You'd be rotating both shapes in set (a) about a single point at the same time. Not each shape individually.
Alas, the question asks for something else

>>130321752
Not really cool with this interpretation shit. Isn't that how we got here in the first place? Shouldn't we talk straight and clear as white people? This seems like Jewish tricks.

>>130321562
The myth started with stupid pseudoscience "jews have higher (((verbal iq)))". Memorizing a few more vocabulary in school doesn't mean someone has higher G factor

>>130311123
Yes
t. kike

File: images.jpg (9KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 300x168px

Ok, time for school

You know, >>130321634 sometimes you don't have to take things that literally

>>130322073
87 :P

>>130311374
This is wrong and just shows that either your grasp of English is very poor, or you're just dumb

>>130322073
L8

File: wojak.jpg (43KB, 626x750px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 626x750px

>>130311123
DELET DIS

>>130320166
b

>>130320689
It's asking if a and b in set A={a,b} are identical.

>>130313342

under-rated

>>130315552

kek. How does a person assemble furniture or assemble anything if you can't rotate shit in your head?

Did the Cambridge psychometrics pattern recognition and spatial reasoning and got 33/33 on the first try. I'm convinced people fail to do this shit because they are emotionally weak and give up the moment something isn't easy. Like a mix of learned helplessness and ADHD. The alternative is too depressing to ponder: having the skills to build a tree house makes you above average intelligence in our societies.

>>130317748
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsZjaSHQVJo

>>130322015
They were often raised bilingual or trilingual too which may have inflated this score a bit

>>130320166
In the first figure, the farthest left shaded area moves 5 units clockwise and the other shaded area moves 2 units clockwise for each figure ensuite.

>>130322258
Yeah apparently I have a low IQ which is weird because I used to have a mid 100 IQ. Maybe I just gave up somewhere along the line.

>>130322073
Look at it upside down, 87.

Hint: unlike other form of IQ, spatial can be trained.

>>130322073
the car is parked between the lines, trick question.

>>130321988
Spatial IQ has nothing to do with communication.

In fact, some of the questions that are a little tougher will have OP's picture with no words at all, other than "true or false".

Higher IQ people will say true... because they can piece it together without any instructions.

>>130312142
>>130313147
>>130313310
My answer demonstrated that the figures do not match within each set, does this really need to be spelled out for you?

>>130311374
You just earned your swastika!

File: 1493193965365.jpg (18KB, 367x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 367x400px

>>130322160
>>130322131
Well that was easy, wasn't it. A little math one and then we return to reading comprehention

>>130311543
Google it cunt

>>130320496
Diagonals.

The center circles are conserved off southeast diagonals. And the triangles are conserved off southwest diagonals

>>130322160

This.

>>130322514
Then why aren't there female engineers?

>>130322522
I get it but how does interpretation come into play? What is the trade off of practical thinking vs this?

>>130321916
Tomatoes
>>130321970
When you explain it that way it makes sense. The way the problem is presented feels like it's designed to be purposefully interpreted wrong.

>>130322563
All numbers add up to 22 for each square.
Thus, it's 9.

>>130322311
Yes, but to what degree does confidence in your own intelligence come from actually being intelligent?

>>130311907
Same.

Question left a lot of ambiguity.

>>130311374
two in each set you moron, you chose two from different sets
kys you low IQ mongrel

>>130319008
The question is poorly worded, and anyone that doesn't see how the meaning is ambiguous is a retard

>>130311123
I thought they were better

>>130322073
This one is strange. I think it being a test confuses thinking. I didn't see the answer but if I was in a building giving directions and suck the answer would be obvious.

This shit is making me question shit too much.

>>130322921
a is a set
b is a set
.........

>>130322563
It's 9 this one was tricky,

>>130319054

You've a tenuous grasp on the English language.

It specifically and unambiguously asks if the two figures (pair) in each set (a and b respectively) can be made identical. They cannot. The answer is no.

It does not ask if the two figures from set A can be made to match those from set B.

>>130318769
Someone explain the pattern please.

>>130322159
>

>>130322563
9

>>130322770
Agreed

File: 8nLFCVP.png (51KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 657x527px

>>130313268
I remember building a 256 diameter glass sphere in minecraft survival just to put my island inside it. Am I autism?

>>130322563
sauce ? I wanna play with them plz

lmao at the dumb americans here, fuck me hahaha
TWO IN EACH SET
a is a set
b is a set

>>130322882
>but to what degree does confidence in your own intelligence come from actually being intelligent?

very little, people who are 100 IQ usually overrate it, its self-judged on the number of taps on the back you recive and school success. both are relativly bad reference points.

>>130322331
Is this cartoon supposed to be "funny"?

>>130320024
How dumb are you that you can't detect when a question is poorly worded?

Better wording: can set 'a' be rotated in space to match set 'b'

>>130322692
There are, they just tend to flock to lower spacial IQ heavy engineering fields like programming and for some reason Chemical engineering.

Is this loss?

>>130314185
That's all well and good, but I'd argue that that does not really test spatial IQ as was OP's intent, but some other type of intelligence or even just personality. It's evident to the non-retards of the thread that 1 matches 4 and 2, 3; the debate is over wording, not spatial manipulation.

>>130323056
Set A has (x-shape, y-shape) and set B has (y-shape, x-shape) configurations. It's not hard to see how the question can be misinterpreted.

File: PURED.com.png (45KB, 292x362px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 292x362px

>>130311123
>>130311449
pic related is me and i had no problem with it

>>130323056
The way the question is worded is ambiguous.

Trust me, I have a bachelors in chem from UC Berkeley. I am probably smarter than you. The question is poorly phrased and can mean more than 1 thing.

>>130323176
It's for normies.

>>130323079
Yes it does but it's more about reading comprehension than spatial IQ, and that people aren't normally faced with this need for such high level comprehension. There's something to be said about the success of white civilization by not making shit too ambiguous according to some autistic standard for all citizens.

>>130311123
I'm have jewish blood and this isn't hard.

File: for_bad_spacial_reasoning.png (60KB, 600x530px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 600x530px

>>130311374

>>130321049

19.8 ?

>>130311123
2d/3d/4d CAD grand wizard architect checking in, been writing CAD applications since the 80's for all disciplines and big fish sectors.
Trust me, only the nordic white man has the god tier spatial visualization capabilities. Jews aren't doing shit without him.

The question you pose is loaded and lacks enough descriptive information to have one correct distinct answer. There are several correct answers with variances and caveats based upon the language used in the problem.

There are 2 distinct objects in each set, (2) distinct objects in both of the (2) sets out of the (2) objects (4 total) displayed.

>>130323207
THAT'S STILL NOT CORRECT YOU FUCKING MORON LMAO
a is a set
b is a set
can the two in a be made equal
can the two in b be made equal
fuck me sideways

>>130323079

You are implying implicit pairing.

There is no such implication in the text.

>>130321049
20
This answer involves a bit of rounding. If Paul started out as 35 then 21 would be a perfect matching answer. and if Paul started out as 30 then 18 would be a perfect matching answer, anywhere in between involves some rounding so 19/20 are reasonable answers.

>>130320166
it's much easier if the triangles have 2 diff color

>>130323302
It's easy because of your Goy blood

It's your Jew blood that won't let you admit this

>>130323285
it's ambiguous to you because you're a fucking retard

Low T makes you awful at this too, supplementing trannies can even attest.

>>130323225
Wrong. Programming needs math and logic and it's hugely male dominated. Females give up on math and pick bio or chem which is memorization and many times pre-med.

>>130323353
See
>>130323285

>>130323207
Who gives a fuck how it's worded?

The point of a SPACIAL IQ test isn't wording.

You should be able to figure this out with no wording at all.

File: 0d2708b58c998eef7f0bd401c0a55150.jpg (9KB, 236x222px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 236x222px

>>130323148
Don't know the source, sorry just googled a year a go for some riddles. Reverse search found nothing of the origin site only other puzzles

>>130312511
>Why are there so many great Jewish physicists?
There are no great Jewish physicists. Since you don't know shit about physics, you don't understand when it's true or false that a physicist was great.

Einstein plagiarized everything he ever did from whites. So did Feynman. It's just the way kikes operate. They are good at publicity for personal gain however.

>>130323285
>bachelors in chem
is that meant to prove something? lmao please stop you fucking moron

>>130323285
> U.C. Berkley

Literally a fucking commie autist.

>>130322692
In part, because they don't train. And no, I'm not saying women and men have the same IQ and genes so don't even try le "deus vault" fagot, I see you children coming a mile away.

File: ff13.png (134KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 800x800px

>>130323391
Then it would be too easy

>>130323436
Practical usage matters, mucklefuck. These skills aren't required for most people.

More importantly, can white's be trained for high level IQ, but Jews can't? That's the real question.

why only spatial iq?
Israel is 95.
they're less then average in all iq.

>>130323436

No I am actually smarter than you and probably have better test taking skills, that's why I can see that this is a poorly worded question.

>>130323533
They're birds on a rhino. They have their place but they've become parasitic. Time to find new birds.

>>130322692
Because women are exposed to less prenatal testosterone, which correlates with bring interested with people instead of things.

>>130323482
see what? all I got was a stupid reply

>>130323364

The fact that the figures are separated into two distinct groups and that comparing them across groups would be more complex (compare 1 and 3 or 1 and 4 etc.) implies that the question is to be understand how I interpreted it.

It's a little obtuse but the implication is there.

>>130323550
Yes. You probably work at a Wal-Mart, if you even work at all.

Believe me. I have better test taking skills than you. This question is poorly worded. That's a fact.

>>130323583
thursday.

lion speaks truth on thursday, but unicorn lies on that day

>>130312970
Imagine what the guys who had to actually build this thought about it

>>130323583
Thursday

>>130323605
yeah, let smarter people use these skills darling.

>>130323761
See an optometrist.

>>130323583
Thursday

>>130323560
Science majors in Berkeley tend to stay out of the politics.

Science majors in every university, in fact.

>>130323809
I'm pretty sure my masters in comp sci is more impressive than your bachelors in chemistry. I would be embarrassed to have that lmao...

>>130313926
Within each set, or between each set?

The question is ambiguous so you cannot provide an objective answer.

This is the perfect sort of question for a jew; he can argue he is correct no matter what answer he gives.

>>130323570
You're getting very defensive, could it be that it's dawning upon you that your claim is complete shit?

Also I think you're confusing the second crusade with the children's crusade

>>130322563
9?

>>130323898
lol, shill can't even reply with any logic

>>130323353
I was giving wording based on his interpretation. Are you not able to follow a conversation?

>>130324024
Correct.

File: PuzzleL1P26.gif (6KB, 366x242px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 366x242px

Well done, now for a real easy one so that even aussies and burgers may answer in time

>>130323978
Depends where you got it.

I'm kind of a "nerd" but even comp sci is way to fucking nerdy for me.

>>130324082
Here's a (you).

>>130311123
and above average actual IQ, the only one that matters :^)

>>130323876
Trained people, dumb nigger. Just like it is for everybody. A baseline capability is just as valuable. What's more important is whites don't act like back biting niggers like yourself with your bucket crab mentality.

>>130323753
It affects abilities at least as much as it does interests

Women love music but you don't see them excelling in it

>>130323993
in each set
two figures in each set
in each set
two figures in each set
fucking hell

>>130311123
For the people with reading comprehension problems.
Can the two figures in each set be made identical by rotating them in space? =
Can the two figures in (a) set be made identical by rotating them in space? +
Can the two figures in (b) set be made identical by rotating them in space?

Jesus christ english is my third language even I get it

>>130323583
>>130323485
>>130322563
hey kraut, are you a psychologists?

I have pretty superior spacial reasoning, but I usually struggle with these type of tasks >>130321049 >>130320166

what are the previous abilities called?

>>130324130
3
5
4

>>130324150
The most idiotic reply posted here

>>130323482
The question is bullshit because it expects you to understand the mathematical definition of a set. Most people here are thinking of (a) and (b) as vectors, in which case the order matters. In a set, the order in which things are presented don't matter, only that they simply exist.

File: 1494959784543.png (1MB, 1218x1248px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1218x1248px

>Implying /pol/ knows anything about inorganic chemistry.

>>130324130
Circ = 3. Tri = 4. Star = 5.

>>130324130
Triangle = 4
Star = 5,
Circle = 3.

>>130324244
exactly man holy shit
people here are really irritating me
they clearly fail every exam they take lmao

>>130324339
Like I originally said it is a tricky question.

File: 1497438640350.jpg (61KB, 1000x800px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1000x800px

Good work everyone, I think captcha is raising our IQ's

>>130324315
Are you a liberal by any chance?

>>130324130
star 5
circle 3
triangle 4

>>130324426
Yeah. /pol/ is full of retards, man. Wonder why I even browse here...

>>130323089
>Someone explain the pattern please.
You have to think like in sudoku (which was actually invented in France by the way). Look at each row and column. Established what has been used already and can't be used again. It's basically a process of elimination.

IQ threads are boring

The facts are all out there

Watch Molyneux interviewing Lynn for the latest evidence of male IQs being significantly higer on average than female IQs by the age of 25 on top of the long known fact that the spread of male IQs is much greater than females so in high IQ range men outbumber women at a ratio which grows the higher you go

>>130324132
You're too stupid to even try it that's why. Have fun with your bachelors mate

>>130311123
Call us purveyors of degenerate media and perpetrators of institutionalized usury, and you might have an argument. Calling us stupid, however, is just silly.

>>130323257
>pic related is me and i had no problem with it
Understands fucking nothing about statistics.

File: 1485451250988.gif (931KB, 471x355px) Image search: [Google]

931KB, 471x355px

>>130324252
I am not and for the most part I have no idea what they are officially called. For me they just fall into things like logic, number or dimensional imagination. Though different languages don't help either to discribe such things

>>130324615
>bragging about your degree
I wonder if someone can match my Physics degree from a top 5 university?

>>130323285

if its ambiguous you write in the margin. These are the assumptions i make and then solve it anyways. if you have ever taken any exams, you would know this.

>>130324514
a lot of them clearly lack analytical skills
suppose you don't need them for politics

>>130311374
>>130311877
No. I thought yes at first b/c A_0 = B_1 and A_1 = B_0, but if you read carefully, it's asking "can the two figures...be made identical by rotating them in space" foreach set.
Still terrible phrasing. I guess it's a trick question.

>>130323753
The gender of the baby does not influence prenatal testosterone levels.

>>130324514
Yes but how many whites were uneducated but capable of sailing or building shit? Raising animals and farming? Exploring and blowing up dirty niggers?

Whites succeed because they work together, not because of taking tests. The argument is whites are capable of higher IQ in important areas, not that every white is some ubermensch.

I did an IQ test at a doctor 10 years ago because my mom thought I was retarded.
Turns out I wasn´t retarded just very bad at reading and writing. I am afraid to take another test because I don´t think I might score as high.