I need sources on why Bill C-16 is bad. I'm in an argument with a person who said that the bill doesn't mean that someone can be charged if they misgender someone. She's saying it only includes hate crimes.
>>130299366
> only includes hate crimes
What did he mean by this?
>>130299803
>When enacted into law, the bill will amend the Canadian Human Rights Act by adding "gender identity or expression" as a prohibited ground of discrimination.[6] That would make it illegal to deny services, employment, accommodation and similar benefits to individuals based on their gender identity or gender expression within a federal regulated industry. A person who denies benefits because of the gender identity or gender expression of another person could be liable to provide monetary reimbursement. This prohibition would only apply to matters within federal jurisdiction.
>>130299366
Anything can be defined as a hate crime if somebody feels offended by it.
>>130300143
I need sources for it.
>>130299366
All hate crime laws are bullshit because they automatically give people more rights over others for no apparent reason. For instance, if you got in a street fight with a tranny instead of just a regular guy, the circumstances would become much different.
Also, if I am an employer and Todd suddenly decides to become Cindy and wear little girl clothes to work, I can't fire him for it.
Also, men are now allowed into women's changerooms. The problems are obvious there.
>>130300533
Look I just need a good source on how misgendering someone can be considered a hate crime or I won't win this.