How would a libertarian society have prevented this?

Toast Marshmellows

>>130260563
>1 post by this id
shill detected

>>130260563
Why prevent that, mostly pakis, niggers and Muslims died in this fire. This was in a poor part of London. The building was full of shitskins. Let them die.

>>130260563
Pay for a private fire fighting force to save your office and your office alone.

File: 1497580522892.jpg (17KB, 500x508px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 500x508px

Yes, in a libertarian society that building would've never came into being

>>130260563
Their homeless so they wouldn't libe there.

The fire is violating the NAP

Without roads no one could even get to the apartments in the first place

>>130260563
There wouldn't be a government housing tower.

By firing a tomahawk missile at the apartment the moment it started smoking because the smoke violated the NAP by inconveniencing the guests a cookout being held by the warlord next door.

>>130260563

Prevent it? In a Libertardian society this would be a weekly occurrence, with the added bonus of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_firefighting#Rome

File: OItnWGv.jpg (42KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 480x270px

>>130260695

>>130260563
In a libertarian society the best contractors would've worked for the best price to construct the best building out of the highest quality materials.

Instead we got a half-ass building built by some government employed contractors who only did as well as they had to to avoid getting fired.

/thread

File: 1466821942947.png (198KB, 480x260px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 480x260px

>>130260563

Libertarians don't believe in prevention.

>>130260563
Librarians are not known to be good firefighters.

File: 110613.Libertarians1.jpg (285KB, 1600x1035px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1600x1035px

>>130260563
Demographically.

Any society that had become this nonwhite would not be libertarian.

>>130261000
Actually a pretty good argument

>>130260563
By keeping out muslims.

>>130260563
fire would be privatized

>>130261546
>He doesn't know about private firefighters

https://www.wildfirex.com/private-firefighting/

>>130260563
Libertarian >> No building and fire regulations >> 2 of such a fires per day in any big city

File: Cuck.png (2MB, 1220x911px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1220x911px

>but if you can't live without the government, how can you live without the government?

>>130260563
Being the fence-sitting cuckolds they are, libertarians would only let more brownskins in and do nothing about it.

The contractors of build it for the best price for the highest quality possible

If it went on fire anyway Private firefighters and the company that built it would be sued by all the families

>>130260563
There wouldn't have been government subsidized housing in the first place.

>>130261335

Yeah no. Overheads are a thing regardless of what fantasy you live in.

>>130262534
Interesting.

>>130260563

You'd have to change the laws of physics to prevent fire faggot.

>>130260563
There would be no roads for the refugees to come into the country on.

>>130262654
the laws of physics are a misogynist patriarchal social construct.

>>130261335
Yeah, in a libertarian society we'd all live in space and have evolved to survive without oxygen so house fires would be a thing of the past.

>>130262553
B-but, the best things and the best stuff because the best reasons!

>>130260563
There would be only mudhuts in a libertarian society.

>>130260563
fireproof buildings resultant of hyper effective markets not wanting to lose one red cent to some blunder of safety

>>130262187
The third world is way ahead of you Gary Johnsons. You have a house fire here and they turn up and won't do anything until payment is agreed.

A price well worth paying for freedom from taxation. (you do have to wonder who starts all the fires though)

>>130260563
praying and changing there facebook profile picture.

>>130263151
>fireproof buildings
Most consumers wouldn't be able to afford such a luxury so more likely you'll just have an oversupply of dirt cheap accommodation that isn't fireproof being the assumption is that such events are too rare to be worth the premium on offer.

>>130260563
The people that burned to death would stop spending money with the landlords that have dangerous buildings and their profit would have been lowered.

That my friend, is the invisible hand of the free market at work.

File: 1487330523511.gif (415KB, 480x238px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 480x238px

>>130260563
A libertarian society wouldn't have a government-built and -maintained public housing project in the first place, genius.

>>130263211
Marcus Crassus invented that in first century BC Rome. He had his slaves sit on top of the hills looking for smoke, and when they saw some he would have them all run to the fire. Then he'd find the owner of the building and negotiate to buy it from them. If they didn't sell he let it burn a bit, and then offered them a lower rate. When they finally sold, he had his people put the fire out, and then rebuild tenaments on the spot. In this way, he wound up being the landlord for half of Rome.

>>130264237
This.
If i were a private fire fighter i think it would be easy to have already formed a cartrl with all other firefighters. we wont raise a finger to save you and your family unless you hand over all your wealth.
"Bu-bu-but it would ruin your reputation!"
Dead men tell no tales.

>>130260563
They wouldn't of deducted the fire departments pay for social programs.

>>130263481
How do you know which landlord has a dangerous Building? Or will you only avoid the ones that already had burned buildings? I can tell you how to prevent it. Landlords need to pay from their own pocket damages that subpar construction caused. This guy for example would owe 2 million dollars per lost life for every dead person to every family.

>>130260678
>it actually came true

Cool bot-generated slide thread.

>>130260563
Prevent it? We would cause it in every Muslim majority block and poor gov regulations would mean that poor people wouldn't be able to afford private security. We could fight the shitskins out of our land.

>>130260563

Increased competition = increased competitive output = superior products at lower prices.

Free-market wins again.

>>130265819
>>I can tell you how to prevent it. Landlords need to pay from their own pocket damages that subpar construction

What will compel the landlord to make these costly repairs? More regulation, or a more free market?

The answer is both, but only one costs money and hinders the market.

>>130267085
No regulations they just will have to take the Responsibility. Its logical.